Латинская Америка и Азиатский банк инфраструктурных инвестиций: конструктивистский анализ

Обложка
  • Авторы: Турци М.1, Мендес А.2,3
  • Учреждения:
    1. Университет Центра макроэкономических исследований
    2. Университет ESIC
    3. Лондонская школа экономики и политических наук
  • Выпуск: Том 22, № 3 (2022): Латиноамериканский дискурс идентичности и новая региональная интеграционная повестка
  • Страницы: 478-494
  • Раздел: ТЕМАТИЧЕСКОЕ ДОСЬЕ
  • URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2313-0660/article/view/320525
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-3-478-494
  • ID: 320525

Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

Рассматриваются взаимоотношения между Латинской Америкой и Китаем. Авторы пытаются ответить на вопрос, почему страны региона проявляют пассивность в контексте их взаимодействия с таким проектом, как Азиатский банк инфраструктурных инвестиций (АБИИ). Актуальность темы обусловлена постепенным ростом значимости и присутствия Китая в Латиноамериканском регионе. Китай является одним из ключевых экономических партнеров ряда латиноамериканских стран. Однако страны региона не проявляют особой активности в своем взаимодействии с АБИИ, несмотря на наличие конкретных материальных стимулов. Методологически исследование базируется на использовании конструктивистского подхода. По мнению авторов, альтернативные парадигмы международных отношений, такие как либерализм и реализм, не в состоянии объяснить парадокс упорного бездействия латиноамериканских стран. Это объясняется тем, что исторически укоренившийся и культурно связанный процессуальный характер международных отношений позволяет конструктивизму раскрыть отдельные факты, которые привели к подобному результату. Авторы приходят к выводу, что правительства латиноамериканских стран «сконструировали» между собой довольно много привычных моделей поведения, которые ослабляют их способность к агентности в международных делах. В результате образовался вакуум эффективной стратегии в отношениях с Китаем в регионе. Более того, такая модель взаимодействия не ограничивается только Китаем и проявляется в отношениях стран региона с США и другими внерегиональными державами.

Об авторах

Мариано Турци

Университет Центра макроэкономических исследований

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: marianoturzi@uca.edu.ar
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4370-6412

доктор наук (латиноамериканские исследования), профессор международных отношений

Буэнос-Айрес, Аргентина

Альваро Мендес

Университет ESIC; Лондонская школа экономики и политических наук

Email: a.mendez@lse.ac.uk
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0919-5081

доктор наук (международные отношения), cодиректор подразделения Глобального Юга аналитического центра LSE IDEAS, старший научный сотрудник Лондонской школы экономики и политических наук

Мадрид, Испания; Лондон, Великобритания

Список литературы

  1. Alden, C., & Aran, A. (2017). Foreign policy analysis: New approaches. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  2. Barnett, M. (1999). Culture, strategy and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005001001
  3. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: The Penguin Press.
  4. Bernstein, M. H. (1955). Regulating business by independent commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. Best, J. (2008). Historical development and defining issues of constructionist inquiry. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 41-64). New York: Guilford Press.
  6. Brands, H. W. (2003). Ideas and foreign affairs. In R. D. Schulzinger (Ed.), A companion to American foreign relations (pp. 1-14). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  7. Brenes, E. R. (2014). Strategy development. In U. Jäger & V. Sathe (Eds.), Strategy and competitiveness in Latin American markets: The sustainability frontier (pp. 109-117). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961). The mirror image in Soviet-American relations: A social psychologist’s report. Journal of Social Issues, 17(3), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1961.tb01682.x
  9. Checkel, J. T. (1998). The constructivist turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324-348.
  10. Cooper, A. F., & Shaw, T.M. (Eds.). (2009). The diplomacies of small states: Between vulnerability and resilience. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246911
  11. Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  12. Dargent, E. (2015). Technocracy and democracy in Latin America: the experts running government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107446663
  13. Daza, M. L., & del Solar, B. (2017). Piñera. Biografía no autorizada. Santiago, Chile: Debate.
  14. De la Vega, L. F., & Callado, J. E. (2002). Casos de marketing. México: Pearson Educación.
  15. De Mooij, M. (2011). Consumer behavior and culture: Consequences for global marketing and advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  16. Dominguez, J. I. (2007). International cooperation in Latin America: The design of regional institutions by slow accretion. In A. Acharya & A. I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional international institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 83-128). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491436.003
  17. Ebel, R. H., Taras, R. C., & Cochrane, J. D. (1991). Political culture and foreign policy in Latin America: Case studies from the Circum-Caribbean. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  18. Edelstein, D. M. (2012). Conclusions: Rethinking interwar grand strategies. In J. W. Taliaferro, N. M. Ripsman & S. E. Lobell (Eds.), The challenge of grand strategy: The great powers and the broken balance between the World Wars (pp. 308-336). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136808.012
  19. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
  20. Feldmann, P. R. (2014). Management in Latin America: Threats and opportunities in the globalized world. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04750-8
  21. Finlay, D. J., Holsti, O. R., & Fagen, R. R. (1967). Enemies in politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  22. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
  23. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391-416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
  24. Flockhart, T. (2016). Constructivism and foreign policy. In S. Smith, A. Hadfield & T. Dunne (Eds.), Foreign policy: Theories, actors, cases (pp. 79-94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198708902.003.0004
  25. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1971). Untangling the Cold War: A strategy for testing rival theories. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
  26. García, R. E., & Mendez, A. (2021). Mañana today: A long view of economic value creation in Latin America. Global Policy, 12(3), 410-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12938
  27. Gerner, D. (1995). The evolution of the study of foreign policy. In L. Neack, J. A. K. Hey & P. J. Haney (Eds.), Foreign policy analysis: Continuity and change in its second generation (pp. 17-32). London: Prentice Hall.
  28. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
  29. Giddens, A. (1985). The nation-state and violence: Volume two of a contemporary critique of historical materialism. Oakland: University of California Press.
  30. Giddens, A., Duneier, M., Appelbaum, R. P., & Carr, D. (2017). Essentials of sociology. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  31. Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (1993a). Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical framework. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 3-30). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  32. Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (Eds.). (1993b). Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  33. Graebner, N. A. (1964). Ideas and diplomacy: Readings in the intellectual tradition of American foreign policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  34. Grieco, J. M., Ikenberry, G. J., & Mastanduno, M. (2015). Introduction to international relations: Enduring questions and contemporary perspectives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Grosse, R. (1990). Doing business in the Andes countries. In V. H. Kirpalani (Ed.), International business handbook (pp. 67-96). London: Haworth Press.
  36. Hellinger, D. C. (2014). Comparative politics of Latin America: Democracy at last? London: Routledge.
  37. Holsti, K. J. (1996). The state, war, and the state of war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628306
  38. Holsti, O. R. (1962). The belief system and national images: A case study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6(3), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276200600306
  39. Holsti, O. R. (1967). Cognitive dynamics and images of the enemy. In J. C. Farrell & A. P. Smith (Eds.), Image and reality in world politics (pp. 16-39). New York: Columbia University Press.
  40. Houghton, D. P. (2007). Reinvigorating the study of foreign policy decision making: Toward a constructivist approach. Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00040.x
  41. Houghton, D. P. (2009). The role of self-fulfilling and self-negating prophecies in international relations. International Studies Review, 11(3), 552-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00873.x
  42. Houghton, D. P. (2018). Constructivist analyses of foreign policy. In C. Thies (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of foreign policy (pp. 223-240). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.400
  43. Huntington, S. (2004a). Who are we?: The challenges to America’s national identity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  44. Huntington, S. (2004b). The Hispanic challenge. Foreign Policy, (141), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/4147547
  45. Hurn, B. J., & Tomalin, B. (2013). Cross-cultural communication: Theory and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230391147
  46. Jessup, J. M., & Jessup, M. L. (1993). Doing business in Mexico. Rocklin, CA: Prima Pub.
  47. Kaarbo, J. (2015). A foreign policy analysis perspective on the domestic politics turn in IR theory. International Studies Review, 17(2), 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12213
  48. Kacowicz, A. M. (1998). Zones of peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in comparative perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  49. Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (Eds.). (1999). Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  50. Keohane, R. O. (1988). International institutions: Two approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589
  51. Kras, E. (1995). Management in two cultures: Bridging the gap between U.S. and Mexican managers. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
  52. Krasner, S. D. (1993). Westphalia and all that. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 235-264). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  53. Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, norms and decisions: On the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559044
  54. Kukla, A. (1994). The structure of self-fulfilling and self-negating prophecies. Theory & Psychology, 4(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354394041001
  55. Lambert, P. (2006). Myth, manipulation, and violence: Relationships between national identity and political violence. In W. Fowler & P. Lambert (Eds.), Political violence and the construction of national identity in Latin America (pp. 19-36). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601727_2
  56. Lantis, J. S., & Beasley, R. (2018). Comparative foreign policy analysis. In C. Thies (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of foreign policy (pp. 185-207). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.398
  57. Lebow, R. N. (2016). National identities and international relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316710982
  58. Leidner, D., Carlson, S., Elam, J., & Corrales, M. (1997). A multicultural perspective of the impact of EIS on organizational intelligence, decision making and structure. INSEAD Working Paper, 1-29. Retrieved from https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp1997/97-98.pdf
  59. Lewis, R. D. (2003). The cultural imperative: Global trends in the 21st century. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
  60. Martin, L. (2014). Home sweet anywhere: How we sold our house, created a new life, and saw the world. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
  61. Mendez, A. (2017). Colombian agency and the making of US foreign policy: Intervention by invitation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  62. Mendez, A. (2019). Latin America and the AIIB: Interests and viewpoints. Global Policy, 10(4), 639-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12733
  63. Mendez, A., & Alden, C. (2021). China in Panama: From peripheral diplomacy to Grand Strategy. Geopolitics, 26(3), 838-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1657413
  64. Mendez, A., & Turzi, M. (2020). The political economy of China - Latin America relations: The AIIB membership. New York: Palgrave Pivot.
  65. Merke, F. (2016). English school and constructivism. In D. R. Mares & A. M. Kacowicz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Latin American security (pp. 88-97). London: Routledge.
  66. Merton, R. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267
  67. Oelsner, A., & Vion, A. (2011). Friends in the region: A comparative study on friendship building in regional integration. International Politics, 48(1), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.37
  68. Onuf, N. G. (1989). World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Columbia, S.C: University of South Carolina Press.
  69. Onuf, N. G. (1998). International relations in a constructed world. In V. Kubálkova, N. G. Onuf & P. Kowert (Eds.), Constructivism: A user’s manual (pp. 58-70). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  70. Osgood, C. E. (1966). Perspective in foreign policy. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books.
  71. Penn, J. R. (2001). Rivers of the world: A social, geographical, and environmental sourcebook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  72. Raat, W. D., & Brescia, M. M. (2010). Mexico and the United States: Ambivalent vistas. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  73. Radcliffe, S. A., & Westwood, S. (1996). Remaking the nation: Place, identity and politics in Latin America. London: Routledge.
  74. Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (2017). Rethinking our region in a post-hegemonic moment. In J. Briceño-Ruiz & I. Morales (Eds.), Post-hegemonic regionalism in the Americas: Toward a Pacific - Atlantic divide? (pp. 16-31). London: Routledge.
  75. Roniger, L. (2012). Favors, “merit ribbons,” and services. In T. Hilgers (Ed.), Clientelism in everyday Latin American politics (pp. 25-40). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275998_2
  76. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  77. Sheingate, A. D. (2003). Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development. Studies in American Political Development, 17(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X03000129
  78. Sikkink, K. (1993). The power of principled ideas: Human rights policies in the United States and Western Europe. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 139-170). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  79. Sikkink, K. (2015). Latin America and the idea of international human rights. In J. I. Dominguez & A. Covarrubias (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Latin America in the world (pp. 349-361). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  80. Sotomayor, A. C. (2015). Legalizing and judicializing territorial and maritime border disputes in Latin America: Causes and unintended consequences. In M. Jaskoski, A. C. Sotomayor & H. A. Trinkunas (Eds.), American crossings: Border politics in the Western Hemisphere (pp. 38-65). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  81. Standish, P., & Bell, S. M. (2004). Culture and customs of Mexico. London: Greenwood Press.
  82. Stephens, G. K., & Greer, C. R. (1995). Doing business in Mexico: Understanding cultural differences. Organizational Dynamics, 24(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(95)90034-9
  83. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
  84. Stoessinger, J. G. (1967). China and America: The burden of past misperceptions. In J. C. Farrell & A. P. Smith (Eds.), Image and reality in world politics (pp. 72-91). New York: Columbia Univesity Press.
  85. Sullivan, M. P. (2001). Theories of international relations: Transition vs persistence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107335
  86. Thornton, C. (2018). A Mexican international economic order? Tracing the hidden roots of the charter of economic rights and duties of states. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 9(3), 389-421. https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2018.0020
  87. Toranzo Roca, C. F. (1992). Diversidad étnica y cultural. La Paz, Bolivia: Instituto Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Sociales.
  88. Vermeer-Künzli, A. (2009). The merits of reasonable flexibility: The contribution of the law of treatiese to peace. In G. Nolte (Ed.), Peace through international law: The role of the international law commission. a colloquium at the occasion of its sixtieth anniversary. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03380-3_8
  89. Vucetic, S. (2018). Identity and foreign policy. In C. Thies (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of foreign policy. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.435
  90. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. London: Adisson-Wesley Publishing Company.
  91. Weeks, G. (2015). U.S. and Latin American relations. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
  92. Wehner, L. (2010). From rivalry to mutual trust: The othering process between Bolivia and Chile. GIGA Working Papers, (135), 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1616642
  93. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
  94. Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944711
  95. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
  96. Wiarda, H. J. (1995). Democracy and its discontents: Development, interdependence, and U.S. policy in Latin America. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  97. Wight, C. (2006). Agents, structures and international relations: Politics as ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491764
  98. Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and collaboration: Essays on international politics. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
  99. Zhang, Xin. (2017). Chinese capitalism and the Maritime Silk Road: A world-systems perspective. Geopolitics, 22(2), 310-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1289371

Дополнительные файлы

Доп. файлы
Действие
1. JATS XML
Скачать

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).