Russian National Branding: Between Cultural Archetypes and Marketing Strategies

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The communicative landscape in contemporary Russia demonstrates a marked turn towards national cultural traditions, folklore, and classical art. Unlike the often opportunistic campaigns in popular culture, branding and marketing communications, due to their commercial nature and drive for monetization, signal a new level of identity processes that are permeating everyday life precisely because of their resonance with the public consciousness. The goal is to identify the deep, archetypal foundations of the phenomenon of the national brand, which, in its hybrid form, serves both as a tool for creating a “unique cultural proposition” for the world and for affirming ethico-semantic constants within society that influence internal communication as a tool for identificatory reflection. The methodological framework is based on qualitative casestudy analysis, supplemented by the dialectical principle of historicity, tracing the transformation of cultural patterns from classical exemplars (e.g., the Ballets Russes, Russian ballet) to contemporary hybrid forms (e.g., the Khokhloma brand, the Sigma Boy media phenomenon). The analysis proves that the resilience and success of a national brand are directly correlated with its embeddedness in the specific patterns of the national consciousness, with its orientation towards integrity and a spiritual tonality. In conclusion, the article substantiates the crucial distinction between authentic cultural archetypes and imposed ideological simulacra in the context of Russia’s contemporary branding strategy.

About the authors

Anton N. Fortunatov

Lobachevsky University

Email: anfort1@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6822-2003
SPIN-code: 5462-1631

Grand PhD in Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the Department of Socio-Political Communications, Institute of International Relations and Word History

2 Ulyanova St, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russian Federation

Evgenia G. Firulina

Lobachevsky University

Author for correspondence.
Email: evg-firulina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1847-5285
SPIN-code: 5569-9919

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Socio-Political Communications, Institute of International Relations and Word History

2 Ulyanova St, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russian Federation

Olga M. Orlinskaya

Lobachevsky University

Email: orlinskaya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2453-9767
SPIN-code: 8063-3137

PhD in Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Socio-Political Communications, Institute of International Relations and Word History

2 Ulyanova St, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russian Federation

Margarita V. Dyadchenko

RUDN University

Email: dyadchenko_mv@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5437-6017
SPIN-code: 8532-1750

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Training Course ‘Modern technologies of mass media and mass communications’, Faculty of Philology

10 Miklukho-Maklaya St, bldg 2, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Algavi, L.O., Al-Khanaki, D.A.-N., & Bredikhin, S.S., et al. (2020). Media Communications and Internet Marketing in the Context of Digital Civilization (L.P. Shesterkina, L.K. Lobodenko, Eds.). Chelyabinsk: South Ural State University Publ. (In Russ.)
  2. Anholt, S. (2005). Brand New Justice: How Branding Places and Products Can Help the Developing World. Butterworth-Heinemann.
  3. Baev, P.A. (2023). Civil and national identity of Russians. Sociology, (4), 69–76. (In Russ.)
  4. Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid Life. Polity Press.
  5. Belokurskaya, Zh.E. (2023). Belovezhskaya Pushcha as a national brand: problems and innovations. In O.M. Sokolova (Ed.), Belarusian Youth Forum for the Preservation and Promotion of World Heritage. Forum materials, December 21, 2023, Minsk (pp. 111–118). Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts Publ. (In Russ.)
  6. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
  7. Dinnie, K. (2022). Nation Branding. Concepts, Issues, Practice (3th ed.). Routledge.
  8. Fortunatov, A.N., Fortunatov, N.M., Fortunatova, V.A., & Bokova, A.V. (2020). Between prediction and rememberance: communicative ideal of humanism of the XXI century. Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, (37), 67–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/37/9
  9. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press.
  10. Gilroy, P. (2006). Postcolonial Melancholia (The Wellek Library Lectures). Columbia University Press.
  11. Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity, Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence and Wishart Publ.
  12. Kapferer, J.N. (2004). The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term (3th ed.). Kogan Page Publ.
  13. Khotinets, V.Yu. (2025). Ethnic Identity and Tolerance (2nd ed.). Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.)
  14. Knyazeva, M.L. (2024). Modern artistic and philosophical projects and media, the digital project ‘Russika: Russia – the land of birds’. In A.A. Malyshev (Ed.), Media in the Modern World. 63rd St. Petersburg Readings: Collection of Materials of the International Scientific Forum, April 18–20, 2004 (Vol. 2, pp. 56–58). Saint Petersburg: Mediapapir Publ. (In Russ.)
  15. Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: a place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076
  16. Kovalev, A.А. (2023). The influence of the modern tansformation of national identity markers on the national mentality dominants. Science. Art. Culture, (4), 59–73. (In Russ.)
  17. Lapaeva, V.V. (2024). National identity of Russians and civilizational identity of Russia (political and legal analysis). Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (12), 77–85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.124.12.077-085
  18. Ostanina, O.A. (2015). The problem of socio-cultural identity of Russian society in the 21st century. In A.Yu. Rusakov (Ed.), Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture and Arts. Sociology of Culture: Experience and New Paradigms (Vol. 206, Part 1, pp. 87–89). Saint Petersburg State Institute of Culture Publ. (In Russ.)
  19. Perfilieva, N.V., & Zhikulina, C.P. (2019). ‘Masha and the Bear’ phenomenon in the Russian and foreign mass media. Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism, 8(1), 164–178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2019.8(1).164-178

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).