Anterior Dynamic Versus Posterior Transpedicular Spinal Fusion for Lenke Type 5 Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison of Long-term Results
- 作者: Pereverzev V.S.1, Kolesov S.V.1, Kazmin A.I.1, Morozova N.S.1, Shvets V.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
- 期: 卷 29, 编号 2 (2023)
- 页面: 18-28
- 栏目: Clinical studies
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2311-2905/article/view/133996
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905-3189
- ID: 133996
如何引用文章
详细
Background. Despite the active implementation of dynamic correction in case of idiopathic scoliosis, there are no comparative studies of results of posterior and anterior dynamic correction in patients with completed and near-completed growth.
Aim of the study — to compare clinical and radiological results of anterior dynamic correction and conventional posterior transpedicular correction of Lenke type 5 scoliotic defonnities in patients with completed or near-completed growth.
Methods. Eighty-six patients with Lenke type 5 scoliotic deformities were enrolled in the study. The first group (54 patients) underwent deformity correction via posterior approach using a rigid transpedicular system; the second group (32 patients) — using dynamic correction system. Mean patients’ age was 22.6±12.8 and 27.3±10.9 years, respectively. We studied radiological data before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 2 or more years after surgery. Blood loss volume, duration of hospital stay, and duration of narcotic analgesics intake in the early postoperative period were analyzed. Functional results were assessed using SRS-22 questionnaire.
Results. Preoperative Cobb angle in the first group was 65.5°, and 27.5° at the long-term follow-up. Junctional kyphosis of T10-L2 before surgery was 21.0° and 13.2° at the long-term follow-up. Preoperative Cobb angle of the initial curve in the second group was 52.5° and 24.5° at the long-term follow-up. Junctional kyphosis of T10-L2 before surgery was 19.5°, and 19.0° at the long-term follow-up. Nash and Moe apical vertebral rotation in the first group before surgery was 1.62 and 0.17 at the last follow-up; in the second group, it was 1.80 and 0.81, respectively. Mean number of fixed levels was 6.4±1.0 in the first group and 5.6±1.5 in the second group. Mobility of the thoracolumbar/lumbai curve was higher in the second group, 28.2±9.1°, compared with 36.0 ± 7.2° in the first group. Preoperatively, lumbar lordosis in the second group was 42.5°, in the long-tenn period — 43.5°, and in the first group — 43.4° and 44.3°, respectively.
Conclusion. Both posterior rigid and anterior dynamic correction in case of Lenke type 5 idiopathic scoliosis can provide satisfactory radiological results with initially similar thoracolumbar deformities in patients with completed or nearcompleted growth. However, dynamic approach can reduce blood loss, duration of hospital stay, duration of narcotic analgesics intake after surgery, and improve quality of life in the long-term period.
作者简介
Vladimir S. Pereverzev
National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vcpereverz@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6895-8288
SPIN 代码: 8164-1389
Scopus 作者 ID: 57203843757
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, 10, Priorova st., Moscow, 127299Sergey V. Kolesov
National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
Email: dr-Kolesov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4252-1854
SPIN 代码: 1989-6994
Scopus 作者 ID: 57204112376
Dr. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, 10, Priorova st., Moscow, 127299Arkadii I. Kazmin
National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
Email: kazmin.cito@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2330-0172
SPIN 代码: 4944-4173
Scopus 作者 ID: 57188866207
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, 10, Priorova st., Moscow, 127299Natalia S. Morozova
National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
Email: morozcito@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4504-6902
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, 10, Priorova st., Moscow, 127299Vladimir V. Shvets
National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
Email: vshvetcv@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8884-2410
Dr. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, 10, Priorova st., Moscow, 127299参考
- Lonner B.S., Ren Y., Bess S., Kelly M., Kim H.J., Yaszay B. et al. Surgery for the Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients After Skeletal Maturity: Early Versus Late Surgery. Spine Deform. 2019;7(l):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.05.012.
- Bridwell K.H., Shufflebarger H.L., Lenke L.G., Lowe T.G., Betz R.R., Bassett G.S. Parents’ and patients’ preferences and concerns in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis: a cross-sectional preoperative analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(18):2392-2399. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00020.
- Hirase T., Ling J.F., Haghshenas V., Thirumavalavan J., Dong D., Hanson D.S. et al. Anterior versus posterior spinal fusion for Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Spine Deform. 2022;10(2):267-281. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00436-x.
- Ogura Y., Okada E., Fujii T., Yagi M., Fujita N., Suzuki S. et al. Midterm surgical outcomes of a short fusion strategy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 5C curve. Spine J. 2020;20(3):361-368. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.010.
- Zhuang O., Zhang J., Wang S., Yang Y., Lin G. How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients? Spine J. 2021;21(l):141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.006.
- Antonacci C., Antonacci M., Bassett W., Cuddihy L., Haas A., Cerrone J. et al. Treatment of Mature/ Maturing Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Sanders >5) Usinga Unique Anterior Scoliosis Correction Technique. Med Res Arch. 2021;9(12). Available from: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v9il2.2632
- Lenke L.G. Lenke classification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:537-542.
- Barr S.J., Schuette A.M., Emans J.B. Lumbarpedicle screws versus hooks. Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(12):1369-1379.doi : 10.1097/00007632-199706150-00016.
- Di Silvestre M., Bakaloudis G., Lolli F., Vonunaro F., Martikos K., Parisini P. Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17(10):1336-1349. doi: 10.1007/S00586-008-0731-9.
- Kim Y.J., Lenke L.G., Cho S.K., Bridwell K.H., Sides B., Blanke K. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(18):2040-2048. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138268.12324.1a.
- Нее H.T., Yu Z.R., Wong H.K. Comparison of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus anterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(14):1533-1542. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318067dc3d.
- O’Donnell C., Michael N., Pan X., Emans J., Garg S., Erickson M. Anterior Spinal Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion Both Effectively Treat Lenke Type 5 Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Multicenter Study. Spine Deform. 2018;6(3):231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.054.
- Ergene G. Early-term postoperative thoracic outcomes of videothoracoscopic vertebral body tethering surgery. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2019;27(4):526-531. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.17889.
- Samdani A.F., Ames R.J., Kimball J.S., Pahys J.M., Grewal H., Pelletier G.J. et al. Anterior vertebral body tethering for immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : one-year results on the first 32 patients. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(7):1533-1539. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3706-z.
- Newton P.O., Kluck D.G., Saito W., Yaszay B., Bartley C.E., Bastrom T.P. Anterior Spinal Growth Tethering for Skeletally Immature Patients with Scoliosis: A Retrospective Look Two to Four Years Postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(19):1691-1697. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00287.
- Колесов C.B., Переверзев B.C., Пантелеев A.A., Швец В.В., Горбатюк Д.С. Первый опыт вентральной динамической коррекции сколиозов у подростков с законченным ростом и взрослых: хирургическая техника и ближайшие результаты. Хирургия позвоночника. 2021; 18(3):19-29. doi: 10.14531/ss2021.3.19-29. Kolesov S.V., Pereverzev V.S., Panteleyev A.A., Shvets V.V., Gorbatyuk D.S. The first experience of anterior dynamic correction of scoliosis in adolescents with complete growth and adults: surgical technique and immediate results. Spine Surgery. 2021;18(3):19-29. (In Russian), doi: 10.14531/ss2021.3.19-29.
- Nicolini L.F., Kobbe P., Seggewiβ J., Greven J., Ribeiro M., Beckmann A. et al. Motion preservation surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(4): 1013-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07035-4.
- Baroncini A., Trobisch P.D., Berrer A., Kobbe P., Tingart M., Eschweiler J. et al. Return to sport and daily life activities after vertebral body tethering for AIS: analysis of the sport activity questionnaire. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(7):1998-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06768-6.
- Nash C.L. Jr., Moe J.H. A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(2):223-229.
- Pehlivanoglu T., Oltulu L, Erdag Y., Akturk U.D., Korkmaz E., Yildirim E. et al. Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering to posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of quality of life: preliminary results. Spine Deform. 2021;9(4):1175-1182. doi: 10.1007/S43390-021-00323-5.
- Михайловский M.B., Васюра A.C., Новиков В.В., Сарнадский В.Н., Губина Е.В., Чернядьева М.А. Хирургическая коррекция идиопатического сколиоза у взрослых больных молодого и среднего возраста. Хирургия позвоночника. 2018;15(3):52-60. doi: 10.14531/SS2018.3.52-60. Mikhaylovskiy M.V., Vasyura A.S., Novikov V.V., Samadsky V.N., Gubina E.V., Chemyadjeva M.A. Surgical correction of adult idiopathic scoliosis in patients of young and middle age. Spine Surgery. 2018;15(3):52-60. (In Russian), doi: 10.14531/ss2018.3.52-60.
- Кокушин Д.Н., Хусаинов H.O. Аспекты применения вентральной динамической коррекции при хирургическом лечении пациентов с идиопатическим сколиозом. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2О21;(12):51-55. doi: 10.17513/mjpfi. 13329. Kokushin D.N., Khusainov N.O. Aspects of the use of ventral dynamic correction in the surgical treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovanii. 2O21;(12):51-55. (In Russian). Available from: https:// applied-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=13329. doi: 10.17513/mjpfi.13329.
- Колесов C.B., Кудряков C.A., Шавырин И.А. Хирургическая коррекция грудного сколиоза из вентрального и дорсального доступов. Хирургия позвоночника. 2013;(2):14-22. Kolesov S.V., Kudryakov S.A., Shavyrin LA. Surgical Correction of Thoracic Scoliosis through Anterior and Posterior Approaches. Spine surgery. 2013;(2):14-22. (In Russian).
- Abel M.F., Singla A., Feger M.A., Sauer L.D., Novicoff W. Surgical treatment of Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Comparison of anterior vs posterior approach. World J Orthop. 2016;7(9):553-60. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.553.
- Satake K., Lenke L.G., Kim Y.J., Bridwell K.H., Blanke K.M., Sides B. et al. Analysis of the lowest instrumented vertebra following anterior spinal fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can we predict postoperative disc wedging? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(4):418-26. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153342.89478.d2.
- Wang Y, Biinger C.E., Zhang Y, Wu C., Li H, Dahl B. et al. Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for Lenke 5C scoliosis: a minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(14):E894-900. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829537be.
- Trobisch P.D., Baroncini A. Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus 2-tether construct. Ear Spine J. 2021;30(12):3570-3576. doi: 10.1007/S00586-021-07009-6.
- Yucekul A., Akpunarli B., Durbas A., Zulemyan T., Havlucu L, Ergene G. et al. Does vertebral body tethering cause disc and facet joint degeneration? A preliminary MRI study with minimum two years follow-up. Spine /. 2021;21(ll):1793-1801. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.020.
- Roussouly P., Pinheiro-Franco J.L. Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):609-618. doi: 10.1007/S00586-011-1928-X.
- Tao F., Wang Z., Li M., Pan F., Shi Z., Zhang Y. et al. A comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for restoring and retaining sagittal balance in patients with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25(6):303-308.doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182204c3e.
- Kelly D.M., McCarthy R.E., McCullough F.L., Kelly H.R. Long-term outcomes of anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(2):194-198. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bc948e.
- Otani K., Saito M., Sibasaki K. Anterior instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum follow-up of 10 years. IntOrthop. 1997;21(l):4-8. doi: 10.1007/s002640050108.
- Tao F., Wang Z., Li M., Pan F., Shi Z., Zhang Y. et al. A comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for restoring and retaining sagittal balance in patients with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. J. Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25(6):303-308. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182204c3e.
- Dong Y, Weng X., Zhao FL, Zhang J., Shen J., Qiu G. Lenke 5C Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Anterior vs Posterior Selective Fusion. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(3):324-331.doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001055.
补充文件
