Sustainable mobility and (de)integration of land use and transportation development in Russian cities
- Authors: Saveleva E.O.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 130-140
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2310-8673/article/view/381109
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2310-8673.2024.2.70422
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AMXMKF
- ID: 381109
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the theme of coordinating transport policies and land-use regulation as a means of achieving sustainable development in Russian cities. Particular attention is paid to the concept of sustainable mobility, which emphasizes the importance of creating compact and functionally diverse urban spaces through smart land use policies focused on increasing the accessibility of population centers. The author emphasizes the importance of ensuring integrated planning and development in the areas of land use and transport for Russian cities, the planning structures of which bear traces of the Soviet period. The article examines in detail the regulatory framework for integrating transport planning and development with land use planning in Russian cities, including the existing system of territorial and transport planning documents. The author analyzes the master plans of the largest cities in Russia, presenting an overview of the plans' content and the experience of their implementation. The analysis indicates that transport planning in Russian cities is often carried out in isolation from land use planning, which leads to negative consequences for urban mobility. The population of most cities continues to face problems associated with the inability to harmonize urban development in the areas of transport and land use, including the growing mismatch between travel demand and transport services. The author offers recommendations for overcoming the identified discrepancies in the development of these two areas, including assessing the role of master plans in increasing the integration of planning in the fields of land use and transport. The need for an integrated approach to urban development planning, combining transport planning and land use regulation, is highlighted as a key factor in ensuring sustainable mobility and environmental balance in Russian cities.
References
Holden E. et al. Grand Narratives for sustainable mobility: A conceptual review //Energy Research & Social Science. 2020. Т. 65. С. 101454. Комаров В. М., Акимова В. В. Стратегии устойчивой мобильности: лучшие мировые практики //Экономическая политика. 2021. Т. 16. №. 1. С. 82-103. Нотман О.В. Концепция 15-минутного города как основа устойчивой модели развития мегаполиса в условиях современных рисков // Урбанистика. 2021. № 3. С. 73-85. Millard-Ball A. Levine, Grengs, and Merlin: From Mobility to Accessibility: Transforming Urban Transportation and Land-Use Planning. 2021. С. 141-142. Cervero R. Integration of urban transport and urban planning //The challenge of urban government: Policies and practices. 2001. С. 407-427. Saveleva E. O. Quantifying Spatial Structure of the Largest Regional Centers in Russia: General Patterns and Typological Features //Regional Research of Russia. 2022. Т. 12. №. 2. С. 227-240. Geerlings H., Stead D. The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research //Transport policy. 2003. Т. 10. №. 3. С. 187-196. Bertolini L., Le Clercq F., Kapoen L. Sustainable accessibility: a conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward //Transport policy. 2005. Т. 12. №. 3. С. 207-220. Немчинов М. В., Холин А. С. Тенденции развития комплексных транспортных схем городов //Мир транспорта. 2020. Т. 18. №. 3. С. 120-133. Петрович М. Л., Истомина Л. Ю. Комплексные транспортные схемы как обосновывающие документы генеральных планов крупных городов //Транспорт Российской Федерации. Журнал о науке, практике, экономике. 2012. №. 3-4 (40-41). С. 6-10. Якимов М. Концепция транспортного планирования и организации. движения в крупных городах: монография / М.Р. Якимов. Моква: Litres, 2022. 175 с. Гостев М. Эволюционное развитие систем городского землепользования и транспорта: разработка эвристической модели //Городские исследования и практики. 2019. Т. 4. №. 4 (17). С. 70-92. Набатникова O. (2017) Обновление генплана Москвы станет актуальным вопросом после 2020 года // Недвижимость РИА Новости. URL: https://realty.ria.ru/20170227/408381689.html. (дата обращения 07.03.2024). Liskutov M. (2015) Development Priorities of Urban Transport System in Moscow Agglomeration. In: International Transport Expert Council 2015. URL: http://transport.mos.ru/common/upload/docs/1445948334_Liksutov.pptx. (дата обращения 07.03.2024). Власов Д. Н., Бахирев И. А. Московское центральное кольцо как катализатор изменения мобильности жителей //Academia. Архитектура и строительство. 2018. №. 1. С. 53-58. Шупер В. А., Эм П. П. Расширение Москвы: альтернатива с точки зрения теории центральных мест // Региональные исследования. 2012. №. 4. С. 97-107. Zyuzin P., Ryzhkov A. Urban public transport development: Trends and reforms // Transport systems of Russian cities: Ongoing transformations. 2016. С. 67-99. Zhao P. et al. Disintegration of metro and land development in transition China: A dynamic analysis in Beijing // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2018. Т. 116. С. 290-307. Малинова О. В. О реформировании территориального планирования в Российской Федерации в целях комплексного и устойчивого развития территории. Мастер-план // Academia. Архитектура и строительство. 2020. № 1. С. 5-12. Герцберг Л. Я. Является ли мастер-план эффективным инструментом развития территорий в России? // Academia. Архитектура и строительство. 2023. № 2. С. 5-14.
Supplementary files
