Heuristic and praxeological potential of N.A. Berdyaev's philosophical and historical doctrine in the modern socio-political discourse of Russia
- Authors: Dolmatov A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ulyanovsk State Technical University
- Issue: No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 135-143
- Section: SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2307-9525/article/view/360992
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21685/2307-9525-2025-13-4-13
- ID: 360992
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. The current confrontation between Russia and the West reveals a geopolitical, geoeconomic, and value conflict, which indicates two diametrically opposed socio-political discourses followed by Russia and the West. For the conceptual support of Russian socio-political discourse, it seems prospective to turn to the philosophical and historical doctrine of N.A. Berdyaev. The purpose of the work is to substantiate the heuristic and praxeological potential of N.A. Berdyaev's philosophical and historical doctrine, which can strengthen Russia's position in the context of the geopolitical challenge from the Western world. Materials and methods. The implementation of the research objectives was carried out based on the analysis of N.A. Berdyaev's philosophical and journalistic works. The methodological framework of the study is based on the methodology of research programs by I. Lakatos, which allows us to consider socio-political discourse as a “research program” with a “hard core” and a “protective belt”. In this study, I. Lakatos’s terminology is applied through partial metaphorical structuring, according to the theory of conceptual metaphor by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. Results. It is noted that the modern Russian socio-political discourse, based on traditional spiritual and moral values, is not conceptually sufficient in the context of the geopolitical confrontation with the West. The use of N.A. Berdyaev's philosophical and historical doctrine to support Russian socio-political discourse from the perspective of historiography dedicated to N.A. Berdyaev's doctrine is debatable. The points of view of scientists regarding the potential of N.A. Berdyaev's doctrine are indicated. As a result of the analysis of N.A. Berdyaev's doctrine, the following concepts were identified as prospective for sociopolitical application: personalism as a social worldview, social democracy as a political system, and the Russian idea as Russia's historical mission in the world. Conclusions. The creative improvement of the N.A. Berdyaev's concepts of personalism, social democracy, and Russian idea for the theoretical justification of the Russian model of socio-political development can contribute to strengthening Russia's place and role in the emerging multipolar world.
About the authors
Anton A. Dolmatov
Ulyanovsk State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: antdolmatow@yandex.ru
Postgraduate student
32 Severny Venets Street, Ulyanovsk, 432027References
- Brayford K. Myth and technology: finding philosophy's role in technological change. Human Affair. 2020;30(4):526–534. doi: 10.1515/humaff-2020-0045
- Novozhilova E.O. About the wars of the present and future. Voennaya mysl’ = Military Thought. 2011;(2):2–12. (In Russ.)
- Klausevits K. fon. O voine = On war. Moscow: Eksmo; Saint Petersburg: Midgard, 2007:861. (In Russ.)
- Hobbes T. Leviathan. Moscow: Mysl’, 2001:478. (In Russ.)
- Danilin I.V. The US-China technological war: risks and opportunities for China and the global tech sector. Sravnitel’naya politika = Comparative Politics. 2020;11(4):160–176. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24411/2221-3279 2020-10056
- Mumford L. The Transformations of Man. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1956:188.
- Virilio P. The vision machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994:81.
- Kastells M. Informatsionnaya epokha: Ekonomika, obshchestvo i kultura = The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2000:606. (In Russ.)
- Luzyanin S.G. China – USA: Model 2023. “Managed conflict” or global split? Aziya i Afrika segod nya = Asia and Africa Today. 2023;(2):5–13. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31857/S032150750024431-6
- Bratton B.H. The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015:502.
- Bainev V.F. Technological security as the main strategic priority of the Union State of Belarus and Russia. Natsional’naya bezopasnost’ i strategicheskoe planirovanie = National Security and Strategic Plan ning. 2022;(3):25–33. (In Russ.) doi: 10.37468/2307-1400-2022-3-25-33
- Bartosh A.A. Friction and wear of hybrid warfare. Voennaya mysl’ = Military Thought. 2018;(1):5–13. (In Russ.)
- Yudina T.N., Shmelev P.S. Non-classical wars: the technological war between the United States and China for leadership in the implementation of “artificial intelligence” in the economy. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika = Theoretical Economics. 2024;(6):75–89. (In Russ.) doi: 10.52957/2221-3260-2024-6-75-89
- Petrov M.N., Filippov Ya.S. Technological sovereignty: the evolution of Russian and foreign economic models. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Economics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. 2023;13(5-1):305–314. (In Russ.) doi: 10.34670/AR.2023.38.40.116
- Moschelkov E.N. Civilizational wars in Russia in the 20th and 21st centuries: causes and conse quences for economic and technological development. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2024;(6):210–218. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47475/1994-2796-2024-488-6 210-218
- Paltsev A.I. “Global hybrid war” as a geopolitical strategy of the United States. Gumanitarnye prob lemy voennogo dela = Humanitarian Problems of Military Affairs. 2018;(3):25–35. (In Russ.)
- Maklyuen M. Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka = Understanding Media: The Ex tensions of Man. Moscow; Zhukovskiy: KANON-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole, 2003:464. (In Russ.)
- Wilford H. Emotional intelligence: culture, intimacy, and empire in early CIA espionage. Intelli gence and National Security. 2022;(37):513–525. doi: 10.1080/02684527.2022.2065612
- Agapova E.A. Destructive “challenges” of modern civilization. Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki = Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021;89(6):2–6. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18522/2070-1403-2021-89-6-2-6
- Kheifets B.A. Globalizatsiya 4.0 i Rossiya. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Scientific Papers of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2019;218(4):288–296. (In Russ.)
- Kirichenko E.V. US control over international technology transfer channels: challenges, mecha nisms, trends. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Re lations. 2021;65(7):89–97. (In Russ.) doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-7-89-97
Supplementary files









