«ΕΙΔΟΣ» and its categorical predication by Aristotle
- Authors: Atorin R.Y.1, Vasilchenko M.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- State University of Management
- Synergy University
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 103-112
- Section: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2307-9525/article/view/301348
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21685/2307-9525-2024-13-2-10
- ID: 301348
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. The relevance of this study is due to the role of Aristotle in the issue of systematization of science. It was Aristotle who laid the foundations of the modern classification of objects of study. He used "ΕΙΔΟΣ" as a classification unit. The article clarifies Aristotle's teaching on categories and provides an opportunity to consider its influence on the evolution of the scientific apparatus. The purpose of the work is to comprehensively consider the idea of categories, deducing the tradition to the Pythagoreans and Plato. Materials and methods. Based on the texts of the works "Topics", "Metaphysics", "Physics" it was established that Aristotle, following Plato, believed the method of division as a way to find the substance (essence) of a thing, which is possible if you start with the most general generic categories that certify the existence of any subject. To obtain this conclusion, general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction were used. Results. Based on the analysis of sources, it was established that the mental act is carried out in close connection with things that are subject to further division. According to Aristotle, "man" is something that cannot be further divided, the Philosopher calls man a species and can only be called an attribute. Conclusions. The authors come to the conclusion that the category type is based on the relationship between questions and answers, and the mental act is carried out in close connection with things. Classical Aristotelian mental study of objects begins with the verification of their existence. Aristotle's ideas influenced the development of logic and the theory of knowledge during the Middle Ages and are not possible outside of objects of real existing thingness. In modern logic, attribution and predication are used synonymously.
Keywords
About the authors
Roman Yu. Atorin
State University of Management
Author for correspondence.
Email: romanos-85@yandex.ru
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy
99 Ryazansky Avenue, Moscow, 109542Maxim A. Vasilchenko
Synergy University
Email: maks-vasilchenko@mail.ru
Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Fundamental Legal and Socio-Humanitarian Disciplines
80 Leningradsky Avenue, Moscow, 125190References
- Aristotel'. Kategorii. Ob istolkovanii = Categories. On interpretation. Moscow: AST, 2023:160. (In Russ.) 2. Aristotel'. Sochineniya: v 4 t. T. 2. Red. i avt. predisl. Z. N. Mikeladze = Works: in 4 volumes, volume
- Edition and introduction by Z. N. Mikeladze. Moscow: Mysl', 1978:685. (In Russ.)
- Aristotel'. Sochineniya: v 4 t. T. 1. red. i avt. predisl. V. F. Asmus = Works: in 4 volumes, volume 1. Edition and introduction by V.F. Asmus. Moscow: Mysl', 1978:549. (In Russ.)
- Aristotel'. Fizika. Per. V.P. Karpova = Physics. Translated by V.P. Karpov. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-Attikus, 2023:320. (In Russ.)
- Asmus V.F. Antichnaya filosofiya (istoriya filosofii) = Ancient philosophy (history of philosophy). Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 2009:400. (In Russ.)
- Kommentarii Fomy Akvinskogo k traktatu Aristotelya «Ob istolkovanii»: monografiya = Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on Aristotle's Treatise "On Interpretation": monograph. Saint Petersburg: Russkaya khristianskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya, 2018:248. (In Russ.)
- Akvinskiy F. Sochineniya. Sost., per. s lat., vvod. st. i komment. A.V. Apollonova = Works. Compiled, translated from Latin, introduction and comments by A.V. Apollonov. Moscow: Lenand, 2021:264. (In Russ.)
- Mel'nikov S.A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu Aristotelya: 8 lektsiy dlya proekta Magisteriya = Introduction to Aristotle's philosophy: 8 lectures for the Magisterium project. Moscow: Rosebud Publishing, 2018:246. (In Russ.)
- Slinin Ya.A. Aristotel' i ontologicheskie osnovaniya logiki = Aristotle and the ontological foundations of logic. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2013:359. (In Russ.)
- Kuzina E.B. Logika v kratkom izlozhenii i uprazhneniyakh = Logic in brief and exercises. Moscow: Id-vo MGU, 2000:236. (In Russ.)
- Sarychev E.V., Skorik E.F., Zakharov M.Yu. et al. Logika dlya menedzherov = Logic for managers. Moscow: Yurayt, 2019:395. (In Russ.)
- Skorik E.F. Logika v skhemakh = Logic in diagrams. Moscow: MBA, 2008:119. (In Russ.)
- Starovoytova I.E., Yatsenko O.Yu. Logika i kriticheskoe myshlenie = Logic and critical thinking. Moscow: GUU, 2020:109. (In Russ.)
- Voyshvillo E.K. Ponyatie kak forma myshleniya: logiko-gnoseologicheskiy analiz = Concept as a form of thinking: logic-epistemological analysis. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1989:239. (In Russ.)
- Chelpanov G.I. Logika = Logic. Moscow: Nashe zavtra, 2023:256. (In Russ.)
- Riker P. Bytie, sushchnost' i substantsiya u Platona i Aristotelya. Kurs, prochitannyy v universitete Strasburga v 1953–1954 gg. Per. s frants. G.V. Vdovinoy = Being, essence and substance in Plato and Aristotle. Course given at the University of Strasbourg in 1953–1954. Translated from French by G.V. Vdovina. Moscow: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2019:285. (In Russ.)
- Dziova E.N. The main points of Aristotle's teaching on praedicabilia. Ekonomika i sotsium = Economy and society. 2014;(1–3):194–197. (In Russ.)
- Slinin Ya.A. The concept of tope and predicabilia and their role in dialectical reasoning. Logikofilosofskie shtudii = Logic-philosophical studies. 2009;(7):41–58. (In Russ.)
- Atorin R.Yu., Vasil'chenko M.A. «ΕΙΔΟΣ»: from Plato to Aristotle. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo = Science. Society. State. 2025;13(1):118–125. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21685/2307-9525-2024-13-1-12
Supplementary files
