PARTICIPIAL CONSTRUCTIONS WITH THE MEANING OF SIMULTANEITY IN THE KAZYM KHANTY
- Authors: Muravyev N.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of linguistics RAS
- Issue: No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 59-72
- Section: LINGUISTICS
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2307-6119/article/view/270394
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6119-2022-4-59-72
- ID: 270394
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article deals with participial temporal constructions with the meaning of simultaneity in the Kazym dialect of Northern Khanty. The richness and variety of the inventory of these constructions have been documented in a number of works. However, the existing descriptions do not clearly show their functioning and distribution. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the semantics of simultaneity constructions in more detail and to identify their characteristic features. Data for the study were collected during a field study in the village of Kazym in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Russia, by asking native speakers to complete stimulus contexts, the first part of which consisted of a dependent clause of each construction with a varying predicate. The questionnaire was based on a sample of 50 verbs of different aspect classes. Five constructions were selected for the study: one casemarked participle (locative case) and four postpositional participial constructions with the postpositions pŏrajən, măr(ən), kŭtən, and saxət/sati/sa. The constructions were analyzed based on three aspectual parameters: Telicity, duration, and homogeneity of events. It was found that none of the constructions, with the exception of the locative construction, is compatible with telic background events. In this regard, the pŏrajən construction favors longterm background events, the kŭtən construction heterogeneous background events, the saxət/sati/sa construction short or medium-length background events and telic main events. A closer examination of the received contexts revealed that the pŏrajən construction is not semantically unspecified as described in the literature but expresses a specific meaning of simultaneity with an event that characterizes a period of time. The kŭtən construction, in turn, postulates a heterogeneous background through an initially heterogeneous event, while in combination with homogeneous events, it implies a deliberate interruption of the background event by the subject. The măr(ən) and kŭtən constructions have virtually no restrictions in combination with short-term events, but they are appropriate only in the case of “stretching” these events in time or simultaneity on a smaller scale.
Keywords
About the authors
Nikita Alexeevich Muravyev
Institute of linguistics RAS
Email: nikita.muraviev@gmail.com
Bolshoy Kislovsky Lane, 1/1, Moscow, Russia, 125009
References
- Апресян Ю. Д. Языковая картина мира и системная лексикография / отв. ред. Ю. Д. Апресян. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2006.
- Кошкарева Н. Б. Послелоги хантыйского языка (на материале казымского диалекта) // Н. А. Лукьянова (ред.). Языковые единицы в семантическом и лексикографическом аспектах. Новосибирск, 1996. С. 45–61.
- Кошкарева Н. Б. Временные синтетические полипредикативные конструкции с инфинитными формами глагола в форме местно-творительного падежа в сургутском диалекте хантыйского языка (в сопоставлении со смежными хантыйскими и ненецкими диалектами) // Сибирский филол. журнал. 2007. № 3. С. 158–173.
- Лельхова Ф. М. Глагольно-именные послеложные словосочетания, выражающие временные отношения в хантыйском языке // Вестник угроведения. 2012. № 3 (10). С. 46–51.
- Татевосов С. Г. Акциональность: типология и теория // Вопросы языкознания. 2005. № 1. С. 108–141.
- Черемисина М. И., Кошкарева Н. Б. Сложное и осложненное предложение в хантыйском языке // Языки народов Сибири: Грамматические исследования. Изд-во «Наука». Сибирское отделение, 1991. С. 740–804.
- Dowty D. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language. 1991. № 67. С. 546–619.
- Janda L. A. Russian aspectual types: Croft’s typology revised. In M. Shrager (ed.). Studies in Slavic Linguistics and Accentology in Honor of Ronald F. Feldstein. Bloomingtom: Slavica Publishers. 2015. С. 147–167.
- Kortmann B. Adverbial subordinators in the languages of Europe. In J. Van der Auwera, D. P. Baoill, D. Ó. Baoill (eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Walter de Gruyter, 1998. С. 457–561.
- Schön, Zs. Postpositionale Konstruktionen in chantischen Dialekten. München: Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 2017.
- Talmy L. Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics society. Vol. 1. 1975. С. 419–430.
- Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume 1: Concept structuring systems. MIT Press, 2000.
Supplementary files

