Invisibility of Soviet atheism: the work of A.A. Tarkovsky (Andrey Rublev, 1966)
- Authors: Arinin E.I.1, Volkova V.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
- Issue: Vol 15, No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 157-165
- Section: Philosophy of religion and religious studies
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2223-0092/article/view/380973
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-6-157-165
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JPHPGN
- ID: 380973
Cite item
Abstract
This article analyzes some religious aspects of A. Tarkovsky’s work, in particular, those presented in the film “The Passion for Andrei” (Andrei Rublev, 1966), as a unique phenomenon of Soviet culture during the era of “scientific atheism.” Under the conditions of the dominance of this ideological program, Tarkovsky’s cinematography is explored as a form of visualization of the sacred and invisible. An interdisciplinary approach is applied based on the concepts of Bronislaw Malinowski on the presence of magic, religion and science in the life of any individual and society, as well as Niklas Luhmann on the phenomenon of “invisibility”, showing the mechanism of “reverse invisibility” in the work of the great director, who, bypassing ideological prohibitions and not entering into direct confrontation with them, turned to universal existential issues of personal existence. Through the analysis of key episodes of the film, appealing to the categories of Russian religious philosophy (conciliarity, hesychasm, apophatism, etc.), he made the sacred visible in the conditions of “atheistic reality.” Thus, Tarkovsky’s artistic practice appears not as criticism of religion or propaganda of atheism, but as a complex act of aesthetic and spiritual overcoming of ideological limitations, affirming eternal values.
About the authors
Evgeni I. Arinin
Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Author for correspondence.
Email: eiarinin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6206-8452
SPIN-code: 5251-4026
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Head, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
Russian Federation, VladimirValeria E. Volkova
Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Email: volkova170204@outlook.com
SPIN-code: 8635-4843
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, senior lecturer, Department of English Language, Faculty of Pedagogy
Russian Federation, VladimirReferences
- Arinin E. I. The invasion of religion into Soviet cinema: Between “magic” and “eternity”. Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 311–320. (In Rus.)
- Arinin E.I., Volkova V.E. Visualization of the invisible in the film A. Tarkovsky: The invisibility of Soviet atheism (stalker). In: Art and religion: Antinomies of human nature. Collection of scientific papers (Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs (VLSU)). Vladimir: VLSU Publishing House, 2025. Pp. 9–16.
- Arinin E.I., Volkova V.E. Mask in the era of digitalization: Between the visualization of the sacred and the invisibility of the true. Humanitarian Bulletin of the Tolstoy State Pedagogical University. 2024. Vol. 2. No. 3 (51). Pp. 108–119. (In Rus.)
- Arinin E.I., Lyutaeva M.S., Liu K. The concept of “miracle” in religious studies discourse (semantic features of Russian and Chinese cultures in the perspective of intercultural communication). Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. 2023. Vol. 7. No. 4 (28). Pp. 117–135. (In Rus.)
- Berdyaev N.A. The meaning of creativity. Moscow: Guardian; AST. 2007. 164 p.
- Berendeeva M.S., Borzenkova N.A. Representation of the individual author’s worldview by film director Andrei Tarkovsky in the story “White Day”. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2020. Vol. 19. No. 2: Philology. Pp. 40–55. (In Rus.)
- Bogatyrev D.K., Maslennikov D.V. Mystical, magical and spiritual in Hegel’s teaching on the “religion of witchcraft”. RCAH Review. 2020. Vol. 21. Issue 3. Pp. 66–77. (In Rus.)
- Golovneva E.V. Antireligious film in the USSR (based on the film periodicals of the late 1920s – early 1930s. Religiovedenie, 2023. No. 3. Pp. 150–159. (In Rus.)
- Luhmann N. Invisibility: The “unmarked state” of the observer and his shifts. In: Society of Society. Book 5: Self-descriptions. Moscow: Logos, 2009. 330 p.
- Lyubimova O.V. Antireligious cinema of the 1920s–1930s. Scientific Journal. 2019. No. 5 (39). Pp. 52–55. (In Rus.)
- Nikolskaya T.K. Russian Protestantism and state power in 1905–1991. Abstract of dis. ... of Cand. Sci. (Hist.). St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Institute of History Russian Academy of Sciences, 2003. 27 p.
- Smirnov M.Yu. Scientific atheism in Soviet higher education: Periodization and content. Bulletin of the Pushkin Leningrad State University. 2018. No. 3 (1). Pp. 144–172. (In Rus.)
- Sputnitskaya N.Yu. Features of scaling the protagonist in A. Ptushko’s film “The New Gulliver” and the problem of identity in Soviet children’s cinema of the second half of the 1930s. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. 2015. No. 1. Pp.73–83. (In Rus.)
- Takahashi S. “Andrei Rublev” by A. Tarkovsky: Interpretation of Russian history in the context of Soviet culture. Acta Slavica Iaponica. 2011. Vol. XXIX. Pp. 65–86. (In Rus.)
- Khomyakov A.S. Essays in 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, 1994. 591 p.
- Shakhnovich M.M. Paradoxes of ancient atheism: Problems and opinions. St. Petersburg: Disput. 1992. No. 1. Pp. 32–46. (In Rus.)
Supplementary files

