Analysis of complications after neonatal bladder exstrophy closure, and rationale for an alternative surgical strategy: a case series

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although neonatal closure of bladder exstrophy has conventionally been considered the standard surgical approach, accumulated clinical experience indicates a high incidence of severe complications. To date, the pathogenesis of these complications and the role of specific surgical techniques—particularly pubic bone approximation and the extent of bladder mobilization—in the development of adverse outcomes remain insufficiently studied.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the spectrum of complications following neonatal bladder exstrophy closure, identify their probable causes, and substantiate an alternative surgical strategy.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 33 patients who underwent neonatal bladder exstrophy closure at different institutions and were subsequently referred to our clinic with complications between 2019 and 2024. The timing and nature of complications, as well as the outcomes of reoperations, were analyzed. In most cases, repeat surgery was performed using a modified technique without pubic bone approximation.

RESULTS: The most common complications included complete wound dehiscence (36%), fistula formation (27%), bladder prolapse (18%), and buried penis (12%). In several patients, protrusion of suture material or mesh fixators into the bladder or urethral lumen was identified, accompanied by inflammation and stone formation. Repeat closure with wide bladder mobilization and without pubic bone approximation achieved anatomical integrity in the majority of cases.

CONCLUSION: Neonatal bladder exstrophy closure is associated with a high rate of severe complications, primarily related to tension during pubic bone approximation, insufficient bladder and/or bladder-urethral segment mobilization. Delayed closure at 2–4 months of age without pubic bone approximation demonstrates high anatomical reliability and may be considered a preferable surgical option in specialized centers. Osteotomy should be deferred to a later stage, when the pelvic bones are more robust.

About the authors

Vasily V. Nikolaev

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma — Dr. Roshal’s Clinic

Email: vasnik@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7815-4825

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Nikita V. Demin

Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma — Dr. Roshal’s Clinic

Author for correspondence.
Email: doctor@drdemin.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7508-5019
SPIN-code: 2757-6028

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Zaman MH, Davis R, Maruf M, et al. Exploration of practice patterns in exstrophy closures: A comparison between surgical specialties using a National and Institutional Database. Urology. 2019;131:211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.027
  2. Weiss DA, Groth TW, Abdulfattah SA, et al. Multi-institutional bladder exstrophy consortium after 8 years: The short- and intermediate-term outcomes. J Urol. 2024;212(1):177–184. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003971
  3. Partin AW, Kavoussi LR, Peters CA, Dmochowski RR. Campbell walsh wein handbook of urology-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021.
  4. Marshall VF, Muecke EC. Functional closure of typical exstrophy of the bladder. J Urol. 1970;104(1):205–212. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61700-2
  5. Inouye BM, Massanyi EZ, Di Carlo H, et al. Modern management of bladder exstrophy repair. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14(4):359–365. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0332-y
  6. Baka-Ostrowska M, Kowalczyk K, Felberg K, Wawer Z. Complications after primary bladder exstrophy closure — role of pelvic osteotomy. Cent Eur J Urol. 2013;66(1):104–108. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.01.art31
  7. Suominen JS, Helenius I, Taskinen S. Long-term orthopedic outcomes in patients with epispadias and bladder exstrophy. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(10):1821–1824. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.04.023
  8. Schaeffer AJ, Purves JT, King JA, et al. Complications of primary closure of classic bladder exstrophy. J Urol. 2008;180(4S):1671–1674. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.100
  9. Nelson CP, King J, Sponseller PD, Gearhart JP. Repeat pelvic osteotomy in patients with failed closure of bladder exstrophy: applications and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(6):1109–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.02.007
  10. Ferrara F, Dickson AP, Fishwick J, et al. Delayed exstrophy repair (DER) does not compromise initial bladder development. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(3):506–510. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.10.026
  11. Wu WJ, Maruf M, Manyevitch R, et al. Delaying primary closure of classic bladder exstrophy: When is it too late? J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(6):834.e1–834.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.09.003
  12. Ismiarto YD, Benedict A, Aditya R, Prasetiyo GT. Surgical outcome of bladder exstrophy management with bilateral pelvic osteotomy and external fixation. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2022;86(2):102461. doi: 10.1016/j.epsc.2022.102461
  13. Morrill CC, Manyevitch R, Haffar A, et al. Complications of delayed and newborn primary closures of classic bladder exstrophy: Is there a difference? J Pediatr Urol. 2023;19(3):249.e1–249.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.01.001
  14. Nikolaev VV, Demin NV, Ladygina EA. Delayed surgical treatment of children with exstrophy without approximation of the pubic bones, the use of displaced flaps and immobilization of the patient. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2021;11(4):445–454. doi: 10.17816/psaic1031 EDN: OANICT
  15. Karram MM, Segal JL, Vassallo BJ, Kleeman SD. Complications and untoward effects of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(5-1):929–932. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00122-4
  16. Abouassaly R, Steinberg JR, Lemieux M, et al. Complications of tension-free vaginal tape surgery: a multi-institutional review. BJU Int. 2004;94(1):110–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04910.x
  17. Nehme A, Oakes D, Perry MJ, et al. Acetabular morphology in bladder exstrophy complex. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:125–130. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180380ed1
  18. Castagnetti M, Gigante C, Perrone G, Rigamonti W. Comparison of musculoskeletal and urological functional outcomes in patients with bladder exstrophy undergoing repair with and without osteotomy. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24(6):689–693. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2132-x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).