Genetic predictors of outcomes of assisted reproductive technology
- Authors: Vladimirova IV1, Kalinina EA1, Donnikov AE1
-
Affiliations:
- ФГБУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. акад. В.И.Кулакова Минздрава России, Москва
- Issue: Vol 16, No 6 (2014)
- Pages: 33-36
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2079-5831/article/view/28385
- ID: 28385
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
I V Vladimirova
ФГБУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. акад. В.И.Кулакова Минздрава России, Москва
Email: i_teterina@oparina4.ru
E A Kalinina
ФГБУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. акад. В.И.Кулакова Минздрава России, Москвад-р мед. наук, зав. отд-нием вспомогательных технологий в лечении бесплодия
A E Donnikov
ФГБУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. акад. В.И.Кулакова Минздрава России, Москва
Email: a_donnikov@oparina4.ru
канд. мед. наук, ст. науч. сотр. лаб. молекулярно-генетических методов
References
- Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G.D, de Mouzon J et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod 2009; 24 (11): 2683-7.
- Rosenbluth E.M, van Voorhis B.J. Evolving role of assisted reproductive technologies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 54 (4): 734-45.
- Lledo B, Ortiz J.A, Llacer J, Bernabeu R. Pharmacogenetics of ovarian response. Pharmacogenomics 2014; 15 (6): 885-93.
- Boudjenah R, Molina-Gomes D, Torre A et al. Genetic polymorphisms influence the ovarian response to rFSH stimulation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization programs with ICSI. PloS one 2012; 7 (6): e38700.
- Sunkara S.K, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N et al. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (7): 1768-74.
- Oehninger S. Ovulation induction in IVF. Minerva Ginecol 2011; 63 (2): 137-56.
- Mutsatsa S, Currid T.J. Pharmacogenetics: a reality or misplaced optimism? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013; 20 (4): 314-20.
- Fauser B.C, Diedrich K, Devroey P. Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod Update. 2008; 14 (1): 1-14.
- Wang J, Pang G.S, Chong S.S, Lee C.G. SNP web resources and their potential applications in personalized medicine. Current Drug Metab 2012; 13 (7): 978-90.
- Altmae S, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A, Salumets A. Genetic predictors of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: where do we stand today? Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17 (6): 813-28.
- Laan M, Grigorova M, Huhtaniemi I.T. Pharmacogenetics of follicle - stimulating hormone action. Curr Opinion Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2012; 19 (3): 220-7.
- Livshyts G, Podlesnaja S, Kravchenko S et al. A distribution of two SNPs in exon 10 of the FSHR gene among the women with a diminished ovarian reserve in Ukraine. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009; 26 (1): 29-34.
- Lledo B, Guerrero J, Turienzo A et al. Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor N680S polymorphism on the efficacy of follicle - stimulating hormone stimulation on donor ovarian response. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2013; 23 (5): 262-8.
- Mohiyiddeen L, Newman W.G, Cerra C et al. FSH receptor genotype does not predict metaphase-II oocyte output or fertilization rates in ICSI patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27 (3): 305-9.
- Desai S.S, Achrekar S.K, Paranjape S.R et al. Association of allelic combinations of FSHR gene polymorphisms with ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27 (4): 400-6.
- Desai S.S, Achrekar S.K, Pathak B.R et al. Follicle - stimulating hormone receptor polymorphism (G-29A) is associated with altered level of receptor expression in Granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96 (9): 2805-12.
- Alviggi C, Clarizia R, Pettersson K et al. Suboptimal response to GnRHa long protocol is associated with a common LH polymorphism. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18 (1): 9-14.
- Bentov Y, Kenigsberg S, Casper R.F. A novel luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor mutation associated with amenorrhea, low oocyte yield, and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (5): 1165-8.
- Haasl R.J, Ahmadi M.R, Meethal S.V et al. A luteinizing hormone receptor intronic variant is significantly associated with decreased risk of Alzheimer's disease in males carrying an apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele. BMC Med Genet 2008; 9: 37.
- Altmae S, Haller K, Peters M et al. Allelic estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene variants predict the outcome of ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization. Mol Human Reprod 2007; 13 (8): 521-6.
- Ayvaz O.U, Ekmekci A, Baltaci V et al. Evaluation of in vitro fertilization parameters and estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms for women with unexplained infertility. J Assist Reprod Genetics 2009; 26 (9-10): 503-10.
- Hanevik H.I, Hilmarsen H.T, Skjelbred C.F et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the anti-Mullerian hormone signalling pathway do not determine high or low response to ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21 (5): 616-23.
- Yoshida Y, Yamashita Y, Saito N et al. Analyzing the possible involvement of anti-Mullerian hormone and anti-Mullerian hormone receptor II single nucleotide polymorphism in infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31 (2): 163-8.
- Dupakuntla M, Mahale S.D. Accessibility of the extracellular loops of follicle stimulating hormone receptor and their role in hormone - receptor interaction. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010; 315 (1-2): 131-7.
- Moron F.J, Galan J.J, Ruiz A. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation pharmacogenetics: a simplified model to genetically dissect estrogen - related diseases. Pharmacogenomics 2007; 8 (7): 775-85.
- Yao Y, Ma C.H, Tang H.L, Hu Y.F. Influence of follicle - stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Ser680Asn polymorphism on ovarian function and in - vitro fertilization outcome: a meta - analysis. Mol Genet Metab 2011; 103 (4): 388-93.
- Jun J.K, Yoon J.S, Ku S.Y et al. Follicle - stimulating hormone receptor gene polymorphism and ovarian responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET. J Hum Genet 2006; 51 (8): 665-70.
- Jiang X, Dias J.A, He X. Structural biology of glycoprotein hormones and their receptors: insights to signaling. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2014; 382 (1): 424-51.
- Berger K, Billerbeck A.E, Costa E.M et al. Frequency of the allelic variant (Trp8Arg/Ile15Thr) of the luteinizing hormone gene in a Brazilian cohort of healthy subjects and in patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Clinics 2005; 60 (6): 461-4.
- Ziecik A.J, Kaczmarek M.M, Blitek A et al. Novel biological and possible applicable roles of LH/hCG receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2007; 269 (1-2): 51-60.
- Perrier d’Hauterive S, Berndt S, Tsampalas M et al. Dialogue between blastocyst hCG and endometrial LH/hCG receptor: which role in implantation? Gynecol Obstet Investig 2007; 64 (3): 156-60.
- O’Brien T, Kalmin M.M, Harralson A.F et al. Association between the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) rs4073366 polymorphism and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013; 11 (1): 71.
- O’Brien T.J, Kalmin M.M, Harralson A.F et al. Association between the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) rs4073366 polymorphism and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Reproductive biology and endocrinology 2013; 11 (1): 71.
- Anagnostou E, Mavrogianni D, Theofanakis C et al. ESR1, ESR2 and FSH receptor gene polymorphisms in combination: a useful genetic tool for the prediction of poor responders. Curr Pharmaceutical Biotech 2012; 13 (3): 426-34.
- Nelson S.M, Yates R.W, Lyall H et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone - based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2009; 24 (4): 867-75.
- Kevenaar M.E, Themmen A.P, Laven J.S et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone and anti-Mullerian hormone type II receptor polymorphisms are associated with follicular phase estradiol levels in normo - ovulatory women. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (6): 1547-54.
- Ferraretti A.P, La Marca A, Fauser B.C et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (7): 1616-24.
- American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (5. Suppl.): S188-193.
- Delvigne A. Symposium: Update on prediction and management of OHSS. Epidemiology of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19 (1): 8-13.
- The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (6): 1270-83.
Supplementary files
