Azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone combination therapy: new prospects in light of SPRINT, HOPE-3 and ACCORDION trials
- Authors: Nedogoda S.V1
-
Affiliations:
- Volgograd State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 18, No 5 (2016)
- Pages: 8-14
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2075-1753/article/view/94439
- ID: 94439
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
S. V Nedogoda
Volgograd State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: nedogodasv@rambler.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф., зав каф. терапии и эндокринологии ФУВ ГБОУ ВПО ВолгГМУ 400131, Russian Federation, Volgograd, pl. Pavshikh Bortsov, d. 1
References
- Yusuf S, Bosch J et al. Cholesterol Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med 2016: p. NEJMoa1600176.
- Yusuf S, Lonn E et al. Blood-Pressure and Cholesterol Lowering in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med 2016: p. NEJMoa1600177.
- Lonn E.M, Bosch J et al. Blood-Pressure Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (21): 2009-20.
- Wright J.T, Williamson J.D et al. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. N Engl J Med 2015; 22 (373): 2103-16.
- Edarbi (azilsartan medoxomil), prescribing information. Deerfield, Ill.: Takeda; February 2011.
- FDA approves Edarbi to treat hypertension. February 25, 2011. Available at: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/ PressAnnouncements/ucm244722.htm. Accessed May 4, 2011.
- Sica D, White W et al. Comparison of the Novel Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Valsartan by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Clin Hypertens 2011; 13: 467-72.
- White W.B, Weber M.A et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension 2011; 57 (3): 413-20.
- Bakris G.L, Sica D et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens 2011; 13 (2): 81-8.
- Rakugi H, Enya K, Sugiura K et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension: a randomized, double - blind clinical study. Hypertens Res 2012; 35 (5): 552-8.
- Bönner G, Bakris G et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil compared with the angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril. J Hum Hypertens 2013; 27 (8): 479-86.
- Bönner G, Bakris G.L et al. Comparison of antihypertensive efficacy of the new angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil with ramipril. J Hypertens 2010; 28: 283.
- Kusuyama T, Ogata H et al. Effects of Azilsartan Compared to Other Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and the Sympathetic Nervous System in Hemodialysis Patients. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 2014; 18 (5): 398-403.
- Smith D.H. Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension. Drugs 2008; 68 (9): 1207-25.
- Kusumoto K, Igata H et al. Antihypertensive, insulin - sensitising and renoprotective effects of a novel, potent and long - acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil, in rat and dog models. Eur J Pharmacol 2011; 669 (1): 84-93.
- Iwanami J, Tsukuda K et al. Amelioration of cognitive impairment in the type-2 diabetic mouse by the angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker candesartan. Hypertension 2007; 50 (6): 1099-105.
- Zhao M, Li Y et al. Azilsartan treatment improves insulin sensitivity in obese spontaneously hypertensive Koletsky rats. Diabetes Obes and Metab 2011; 13 (12): 1123-9.
- French C.J, Zaman A.T et al. The angiotensin receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil (TAK-491), suppresses vascular wall expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-I protein potentially facilitating the stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2011; 58 (2): 143-8.
- Cushman W.C, Bakris G.L et al. Azilsartan Medoxomil Plus Chlorthalidone Reduces Blood Pressure More Effectively Than Olmesartan Plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Stage 2 Systolic Hypertension. Hypertension 2012; 60: 310-8.
- Cushman W.C, Bakris G.L et al. Azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone fixed - dose combination lowers BP more than olmesartan/ hydrochlorthalidone fixed - dose combination in stage 2 systolic hypertension. J Hypertens 2011; 29: 118.
- Dorsch M.P, Gillespie B.W et al. Chlorthalidone reduces cardiovascular events compared with hydrochlorothiazide a retrospective cohort analysis. Hypertension 2011; 57 (4): 689-94.
- Bakris G, Sica D et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil. Am J Med 2012; 125: 1229e1-1229.e10.
- Kurtz T.W. Chlorthalidone: don’t call it “thiazide - like” anymore. Hypertension 2010; 56: 335-7.
- Carter B.L, Ernst M.E et al. Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone: evidence supporting their interchangeability. Hypertension 2004; 43: 4-9.
- Peterzan M.A, Hardy R et al. Meta - analysis of dose - response relationships for hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide on blood pressure, serum potassium, and urate. Hypertension 2012; 59: 1104-9.
- Greathouse M. Olmesartan medoxomil combined with hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertension. Vascular health and risk management. 2006; 4: 401.
Supplementary files
