Combined therapy in hypertension: a new fixed-dose combination of angiotensin II receptor blockers and diuretics (azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone)
- Authors: Ostroumova O.D1,2, Fomina V.M1
-
Affiliations:
- A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State Medical and Dental University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 17, No 10 (2015)
- Pages: 13-18
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2075-1753/article/view/94321
- ID: 94321
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
O. D Ostroumova
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State Medical and Dental University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: ostroumova.olga@mail.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф. каф. факультетской терапии и профболезней ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им. А.И.Евдокимова, проф. каф. клинической фармакологии и пропедевтики внутренних болезней ГБОУ ВПО Первый МГМУ им. И.М.Сеченова 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Trubetskaia, d. 8, str. 1
V. M Fomina
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State Medical and Dental University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federationканд. мед. наук, доц. каф. факультетской терапии и профболезней ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им. А.И.Евдокимова 127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
References
- Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертензии (Рекомендации Российского медицинского общества по артериальной гипертонии и Всероссийского научного общества кардиологов). Системные гипертензии. 2010; 3: 5-26.
- Чазова И.Е., Ратова Л.Г. Комбинированная терапия артериальной гипертонии. М.: Медиа-Медика, 2007; с. 86-94.
- Ojima M, Igata H, Tanaka M et al. In vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, in receptor binding and function studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 336 (3): 801-8.
- Sica D, White W, Weber M et al. Comparison of the Novel Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Valsartan by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13: 467-72.
- Bakris G.L, Sica D, Weber M et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13 (2): 81-8.
- White W.B, Weber M.A, Sica D et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension 2011; 57 (3): 413-20.
- Bönner G, Bakris G, Sica D et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil compared with the angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril. J Hum Hypertens 2013; 27 (8): 479-86.
- The ALLHAT officers and coordinators for the ALLHAT collaborative research group. Major outcome in high - risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blоcker vs diuretic. The antihypertensive and lipid - lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981-97.
- Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group: Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. JAMA 1991; 265: 3255-64.
- Neaton J.D, Grimm R.H.Jr, Prineas R.J et al. Treatment of mild hypertension study: Final results: Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group. JAMA 1993; 270: 713-24.
- Kurtz T.W. Chlorthalidone: don’t call it “thiazide - like” anymore. Hypertension 2010; 56: 335-7.
- Carter B.L, Ernst M.E, Cohen J.D. Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone: evidence supporting their interchangeability. Hypertension 2004; 43: 4-9.
- Peterzan M.A, Hardy R, Chaturvedi N, Hughes A.D. Meta - analysis of dose - response relationships for hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide on blood pressure, serum potassium, and urate. Hypertension 2012; 59: 1104-9.
- Sica D, Bakris G.L, White W.B et al. Blood pressure - lowering efficacy of the fixed - dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone: a factorial study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2012; 14: 284-92.
- Clinicaltrials.gov. Efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil co - administered with chlorthalidone in participants with essential hypertension. Study NCT00591773. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00591773?term=NCT00591773&rank=1. Accessed December 13, 2011.
- Juhasz А, Collier D, Caulfield M, Agabiti-Rosei E et al. Achievement of blood pressure targets and safety of azilsartan medoxomil/chlortalidone fixed dose combination versus azilsartan medoxomil in hypertensive patients uncontrolled on monotherapy. J Hypertens 2015; 33: e-Supplement 2, e-8.
- Bakris G, Sica D, White W.B et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil. Am J Med 2012; 125: 1229e1-1229.e10.
- Cushman W.C, Bakris G.L, White W.B et al. Azilsartan Medoxomil Plus Chlorthalidone Reduces Blood Pressure More Effectively Than Olmesartan Plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Stage 2 Systolic Hypertension. Hypertension 2012; 60: 310-8.
- Kupfer S, Neutel J.M, Cushman W.C et al. Comparison of long - term safety of fixed - dose combinations azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone versus olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide. J Hypertens 2012; 30: e-Supplement 1, e-162.
- Sica D.A, Zhao L, Oparil S et al. Long - term safety of fixed doses: azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone vs olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease. J Hypertens 2014; 32: e-Supplement 1, e-582.
Supplementary files
