Endovascular embolization in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma
- Authors: Staleva K.V.1, Yartsev P.A.1, Tsuleiskiri B.T.1, Teterin Y.S.1, Zhigalova M.S.1, Shavrina N.V.1, Rogal M.M.1, Novikov S.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
- Issue: Vol 26, No 12 (2024): Коморбидность в клинике внутренних болезней
- Pages: 875-878
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2075-1753/article/view/289177
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2024.12.202862
- ID: 289177
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Closed abdominal trauma is often accompanied by damage to the abdominal organs and retroperitoneal space. With the development of medicine, minimally invasive methods of treating patients with bleeding due to closed abdominal trauma have become available, including endovascular embolization of the bloodstream, which allows one to avoid traditional operations (laparotomy) in this category of patients and achieve rapid rehabilitation of patients.
Aim. To evaluate the possibility of X-ray endovascular embolization in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma.
Materials and methods. At the Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine in 2022–2024 treated 68 patients with a diagnosis of “closed abdominal trauma”, of which 14 underwent direct angiography. In 4 (28.6%) patients, the intervention was diagnostic, in 10 (71.4%) it was therapeutic and diagnostic. These patients were included in this study: 8 (57.1%) men and 6 (42.9%) women.
Results. Selective embolization of the splenic artery was performed in four (28.5%) cases, the renal artery in 2 (14.2%), the lumbar artery in 2 (14.2%), and the hepatic artery in 2 (14.2%). A retroperitoneal (perinephric) hematoma was punctured percutaneously under ultrasound guidance in one case to exclude urinary leakage in a patient with a kidney injury. One (7.1%) patient required laparotomy due to recurrent bleeding. There were no complications from X-ray endovascular interventions. There were no cases of hematoma infection. One (7.1%) death in a 70-year-old patient with a closed abdominal injury, subcapsular hematoma of the spleen with comorbid pathology.
Conclusion. The use of X-ray endovascular embolization made it possible to avoid traditional surgical interventions (laparotomy) in 20.6% of cases. The introduction of X-ray endovascular hemostasis is one of the priorities in the treatment of patients with closed abdominal trauma.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ksenia V. Staleva
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Author for correspondence.
Email: Staleva_Ksenya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-6014-2522
Res. Assist.
Russian Federation, MoscowPeter A. Yartsev
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: Staleva_Ksenya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1270-5414
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, MoscowBakuri T. Tsuleiskiri
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: Staleva_Ksenya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1687-1308
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowYurii S. Teterin
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: Staleva_Ksenya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2222-3152
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowMariya S. Zhigalova
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: Staleva_Ksenya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4520-1124
Res. Officer
Russian Federation, MoscowNatalya V. Shavrina
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: Staleva_Ksenya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3766-4674
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowMikhail M. Rogal
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: Staleva_Ksenya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1327-6973
Surgeon
Russian Federation, MoscowSergey V. Novikov
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: Staleva_Ksenya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2692-1185
D. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Li M, Yan Y, Wang C, Tu H. Hospital mortality of blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI): a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00492
- MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa052049
- Pape HC, Halvachizadeh S, Leenen L, et al. Timing of major fracture care in polytrauma patients – An update on principles, parameters and strategies for 2020. Injury. 2019;50(10):1656-70. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.09.021
- Luo J, Chen D, Tang L, et al. Multifactorial Shock: A Neglected Situation in Polytrauma Patients. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):6829. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226829
- van Ditshuizen JC, Rojer LA, van Lieshout EMM, et al. Evaluating associations between level of trauma care and outcomes of patients with specific severe injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;94(6):877-92. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003890
- Crichton JCI, Naidoo K, Yet B, et al. The role of splenic angioembolization as an adjunct to nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(5):934-43. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001649
- Arvieux C, Frandon J, Tidadini F, et al.; Splenic Arterial Embolization to Avoid Splenectomy (SPLASH) Study Group. Effect of prophylactic embolization on patients with blunt trauma at high risk of splenectomy: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(12):1102-11. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3672
- Fodor M, Primavesi F, Morell-Hofert D, et al. Non-operative management of blunt hepatic and splenic injury: A time-trend and outcome analysis over a period of 17 years. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14:29. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0249-y
- Brahmbhatt AN, Ghobryal B, Wang P, et al. Evaluation of Splenic Artery Embolization Technique for Blunt Trauma. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2021;14(3):148-52. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_64_20
- Kwon H, Bae M, Jeon CH, et al. Volume preservation of a shattered kidney after blunt trauma by superselective renal artery embolization. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022;28(1):72-8. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.21711
Supplementary files
