Study of the effects of deformation rate and adhesive layer thickness under impact loading on parameters of adhesive joints in a vehicle
- Authors: Liu Y.1, Goncharov R.B.1, Zuzov V.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Bauman Moscow State Technical University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 3 (2022)
- Pages: 251-263
- Section: Transport and transport-technological complexes
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2074-0530/article/view/126632
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/2074-0530-108818
- ID: 126632
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
BACKGROUND: At the present time, new technologies of joints – adhesive joints – are used more and more widely along with spot welding in domestic and foreign vehicles. Study of the joint strength and the influence of deformation rate and the adhesive layer thickness under impact loading on the parameters of the joint in a vehicle is a relevant technical task.
AIMS: Study of the influence of deformation rate and the adhesive layer thickness on the adhesive joint parameters (strength, deformation, etc.) under impact loading as well as evaluation of the efficiency of the proposed modified calibration method for the adhesive layer model on the example of tubular structure, which is often used in the strength elements of a vehicle.
METHODS: Experimental studies were carried out with impact loading at the speed of 6.66 m/s (the axial im-pact) and 6.87 m/s (the side impact) with the mass of 22.3 kg. Simulation of operating conditions was performed in the LS-Dyna software that made possible to study the stress-strain states (SSS) of adhesive-bonded tubular structures and to estimate the simulation error.
RESULTS: Based on experimental and calculated results, the length of the adhesive layer failure under the impact loading in the steel structures bonded with the Henkel EP 5055 adhesive is shorter in the joints with the 0.5 mm thick adhesive layer than in the joints with the 1 mm thick adhesive layer. The total deformation of the bonded structure at the side impact loading for the 1 mm thick adhesive layer is less than for the 0.5 mm thick layer, as the adhesive layer absorbs some of the energy. For the axial impact loading, the differences are insignificant. Errors of adhesive joint simulation under impact loading have been reduced significantly (by 15%) with using the proposed modified method of calibrating the adhesive layer properties considering the influence of the deformation rate and the adhesive layer thickness in the finite element model.
CONCLUSIONS: The practical value of the study lies in the proposed modified model, considering the influence of the deformation rate and the adhesive layer thickness under impact loading on the joint parameters and making possible to improve simulation accuracy, as well as in recommendations for the best value of adhesive joint properties in adhesive-bonded vehicle structures.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Yi Liu
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Email: liuyi941003@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2615-6826
SPIN-code: 3301-3941
graduate student of the Wheeled Vehicles Department
Russian Federation, 5 2nd Baumanskaya avenue, 105005, MoscowRoman B. Goncharov
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Email: rbgoncharic@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4805-967X
SPIN-code: 1180-9530
Scopus Author ID: 816252
Associate Professor of the Wheeled Vehicles Department
Russian Federation, 5 2nd Baumanskaya avenue, 105005, MoscowValery N. Zuzov
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: zuzvalery@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1512-9299
SPIN-code: 1419-7851
Scopus Author ID: 201799
Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Professor of the Wheeled Vehicles Department
Russian Federation, 5 2nd Baumanskaya avenue, 105005, MoscowReferences
- Smirnova MI. Collection of technical specifications for adhesive materials. Ed. by D.A. Kardashov. Leningrad: Khimiya; 1975. 463 p. (In Russ).
- Fays S. Adhesive bonding technology in the automotive industry. Adhesion and Interface. 2003;4(2):37–48.
- Da Silva LF, Rodrigues TN, De Figueiredo MA, De Moura MF. Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength. The Journal of Adhesion. 2006;82(11):1091–1115. doi: 10.1080/00218460600948511
- Makhecha DP, Kapania RK, Johnson ER, Dillard DA. Dynamic fracture analysis of adhesively bonded joints using explicit methods. AIAA Journal. 2007;45(11):2778–2784. doi: 10.2514/1.26088
- Xin Y. Study of modeling techniques of weld-bonded joints under impact loading [dissertation]. Tsinghua University; 2010.
- Carlberger T, Biel A, Stigh U. Influence of temperature and strain rate on cohesive properties of a structural epoxy adhesive. International Journal of Fracture. 2009;155(2):155–166. doi: 10.1007/s10704-009-9337-4
- GOST R ISO 11003-2-2017. National Standard of the Russian Federation. Adhesives. Determination of shear behaviour of structural adhesives. Part 2. Tensile test method for metallic standards with the use of thick adherends. (In Russ). Available from: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/556309663 Accessed: 15.12.2022.
- GOST 9550-81. Interstate standard. Plastics. Methods for determination of elasticity modulus at strength, compression and bending. (In Russ). Available from: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200020731 Accessed: 15.12.2022.
- DIN EN ISO 11343-2019. International (foreign) standard. Adhesives. Determination of dynamic resistance to cleavage of high-strength adhesive bonds under impact wedge conditions. Wedge impact method (ISO 11343:2019); German version EN ISO 11343:2019. Available from: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/563882968 Accessed: 15.12.2022.
- Liu I, Zuzov VN. Numerical modeling of an adhesive joint in automotive structures under quasi-static loading using an improved model of its properties. Transactions of Nizhni Novgorod state technical university n.a. R.Y. Alexeev. 2022;(3):84–97. doi: 10.46960/1816-210X_2022_3_84
- Liu I, Zuzov VN. Modeling of adhesive bonding in automotive structures under dynamic and shock loading using modification of material properties. In: The Future of mechanical Engineering of Russia: Collection of reports of the Fourteenth All-Russian Conference of Young Scientists and Specialists, September 21–24, 2021. Vol. 2. Moscow; 2022. Р. 117–127.
Supplementary files
