Deontological Aspects of the Professional Activity of Judges
- Authors: Begaliyev Y.N.1, Baigaliyev A.B.2
-
Affiliations:
- Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan
- Академия правоохранительных органов при Генеральной прокуратуре Республики Казахстан
- Issue: No 10 (2024)
- Pages: 5-12
- Section: Theoretical and historical legal studies
- Submitted: 26.01.2026
- Published: 18.10.2024
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2072-909X/article/view/376292
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2024.10.5-12
- ID: 376292
Cite item
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to consider issues related to the deontological aspects of the professional activity of judges.
The purpose of the study is to analyze the normative foundations of the Constitutional Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On the Judicial System and the Status of Judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan” concerning issues of deontology, as well as the provisions of the Code of Judicial Ethics of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
The main research methods are the formal legal method, the systematic method, the method of studying documents based on the study of official sources, regulations and legal provisions governing the activities of judges in the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as the empirical method of observation used in psychology. These methods allow us to analyze issues related to the legal aspects of judicial activity, as well as the psychological characteristics of the judge’s behavior.
The relevance of research. The article is of scientific value, because the authors have attempted to show the importance of the features of moral and ethical components in the activities of judges as an instrument of their professionalism, as well as ways to address the existing gaps in national legislation in the field of judicial ethics.
Full Text
About the authors
Yernar N. Begaliyev
Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Author for correspondence.
Email: ernar-begaliev@mail.ru
Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Member of the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Honorary Worker of Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Russian Federation, AstanaAlibek B. Baigaliyev
Академия правоохранительных органов при Генеральной прокуратуре Республики Казахстан
Email: Baigaliev_009@mail.ru
Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Associate Professor of the Department
Russian Federation, Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies under the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of KazakhstanReferences
- Ryskeldieva, L. T. Deontology in the history of philosophy. Simferopol: Tavriya; 2004. 384 p. (In Russ.)
- Kukushin, V. M. Police deontology. Moscow: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; 1994. 140 p. (In Russ.)
- Koni, A. F. Moral principles in the criminal process. Selected works. Moscow: Yurajt; 2016. 148 p. (In Russ.)
- Sukhorukova, O. A. Efficiency of civil proceedings: the communicative aspect. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Ekaterinburg; 2017. 28 p. (In Russ.)
- Roshchevskaya, E. V. Conflictological competence of judicial staff as a factor in improving the quality of justice. In: Actual problems of modern pedagogy and psychology in Russia and abroad. Collection of scientific papers based on the results of the international scientific and practical conference. Issue 5. Novosibirsk: Innovative Center for the Development of Education and Science; 2018. Рp. 88–90. (In Russ.)
- Информация об авторах
- Е. Н. Бегалиев – доктор юридических наук, профессор, член Высшего Судебного Совета Республики Казахстан, почетный работник образования Республики Казахстан.
- А. Б. Байгалиев – доктор философских наук, доцент кафедры.
- Information about the authors
- Ye. N. Begaliyev – Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Member of the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Honorary Worker of Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
- A. B. Baigaliyev – Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Associate Professor of the Department.
- Вклад авторов: авторы сделали эквивалентный вклад в подготовку публикации.
- Contribution of the authors: the authors contributed equally to this article.
- Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов.
- The authors declare no conflict of interests.
- Статья поступила в редакцию 26.03.2024; одобрена после рецензирования 19.04.2024; принята к публикации 28.06.2024.
- The article was submitted 26.03.2024; approved after reviewing 19.04.2024; accepted for publication 28.06.2024.
Supplementary files

