The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Efficiency of Courts
- Authors: Darda A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- North Caucasus Branch, Russian State University of Justice
- Issue: No 9 (2024)
- Pages: 28-36
- Section: Public law (state law) studies
- Submitted: 26.01.2026
- Published: 18.09.2024
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2072-909X/article/view/376283
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2024.9.28-36
- ID: 376283
Cite item
Abstract
The evolutionary development of the entire judicial system is directly related to the introduction of modern artificial intelligence systems. The purpose of this study is to study and analyze the impact of artificial intelligence on the effectiveness of the entire judicial system and judges in particular. To achieve this goal, it is necessary, firstly, to consider the nature of artificial intelligence, its advantages in the administration of justice, secondly, to analyze the potential risks arising from the use of artificial intelligence, and thirdly, to reveal and analyze the impact of artificial intelligence technologies through the prism of criteria for the effectiveness of courts.
The methodological basis of this research is dialectical, systemic, functional, formal and legal methods.
The conducted research made it possible to come to the conclusion that modern artificial intelligence systems are able to seriously optimize the work of the entire judicial system, prevent possible judicial errors and corruption manifestations, shorten the time of consideration of cases, which will undoubtedly increase the efficiency of the entire judicial system. However, there are also negative impacts that must necessarily be eliminated or minimized, with the help of careful study of the mandatory technological requirements used in the creation and further functioning of all artificial intelligence systems.
Full Text
About the authors
Alexey V. Darda
North Caucasus Branch, Russian State University of Justice
Author for correspondence.
Email: aldar72@yandex.ru
Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department
Russian Federation, KrasnodarReferences
- Ismailov, R. R. Judicial interpretation and artificial intelligence. In: V. V. Lazarev, ed. Law and Statute in the Programmed Society (to the 100th anniversary of the Birth of Daniel Bell). Collection of scientific articles. Moscow: The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law Under the Government of the Russian Federation; 2020. Рр. 216–221. (In Russ.)
- Tavokin, E. P. Artificiality of the “artificial sociality”. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2019;(6):115-122. (In Russ.)
- Pashentsev, D. A. The impact of digitalization on the subject of law enforcement. In: V. V. Stroev, D. A. Pashentsev, N. M. Ladnushkina, eds. Law and human rights in the modern world: trends, risks, development prospects. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference dedicated to the memory of Professor F. M. Rudinsky. Moscow: Saratovskij istochnik; 2021. Рр. 154–157. (In Russ.)
- Pashentsev, D. A., Novikova, K. S. Artificial intelligence as a subject of judicial interpretation of law. Obrazovanie i pravo = Education and Law. 2020;(7):198-202. (In Russ.)
- Sycheva, O. A. Common sense in court evidence. Rossijskij sud’ya = Russian Judge. 2019;(8):15-20. (In Russ.)
- Stepanov, O. A., Basangov, D. A. On the prospects for the impact of artificial intelligence on judicial proceedings. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal. 2022;(475):229-237. (In Russ.)
- Pashentsev, D. A. Features of law enforcement in the conditions of digitalization of social relations. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law. 2020;11(1):35-49. (In Russ.)
- Umnova-Konyukhova, I. A. The judiciary and artificial intelligence: the legal aspects of inter action. (Review). Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. IAZh. Ser. 4: Gosudarstvo i pravo = Social and Humanitarian Sciences. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Information and analitical journal. Series 4: State and Law. 2021;(1):106-114. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files

