On the Dual Nature of Interdict Proceedings in Rome During the Era of the Republic and the Principate

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In ancient Rome, there were at least two forms of interdict proceedings. The first form was associated with the magistrate imperium, which operated outside Rome, in particular in the provinces, and could do without transferring the case from the magistrate to the court. Extraordinary investigations in Rome itself belonged to the same form, when, due to the danger threatening the state from public violence, the Senate gave the magistrate dictatorial powers to issue interdicts and punish those who disobeyed them. In case of disobedience to the first interdict, the magistrate could resort to interdictum secundarium, which provided for doubling property liability in civil cases, and criminal liability in public cases, up to the death penalty or exile and confiscation of property through aquae et ignis interdictio.

The second form was related to the transfer of the case, which began with the praetorian interdict, from the magistrate to the ordinary court. There is no place for an extraordinary process here, and the praetorian interdict is only a special pre-trial means of bringing a claim.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Leonid L. Kofanov

Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: leokofanov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0692-0188

Doctor of Science (Law), Professor of the Department; Senior Researcher, Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Dozhdev, D. V. The basis for the protection of possession in Roman law. Moscow: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 1996. 238 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Muromtsev, S. A. Civil law of ancient Rome. Ed. A. D. Rudokvas, scien. ed. V. S. Em. Moscow: Statut; 2003. 685 р. (In Russ.)
  3. Gandolfi, G. Contributo allo studio del processo interdittale romano. Milano: A. Guiffr; 1955. VIII, 168 p.
  4. Pokrovsky, I. A. The history of Roman law. Introd. art., transl. from Latin, scien. ed. and comment. A. D. Rudokvas. St. Petersburg: Letnij sad; 1998. 533 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Franciosi, G. The institutional course of Roman law. Ed. L. L. Kofanov. Moscow: Statut; 2004. 428 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Berger, H. Interdictum. Real Encyklopedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Hbd. 80. Hrsg. von Pauly, Wissowa, Kroll. Stuttgart; 1916. Sp. 1611–1706.
  7. Labruna, L. Vim fieri veto. Alle radici di una ideologia. Napoli; 2017. 336 p.
  8. Sini, F. Sua cuique civitati religio. Religione e diritto pubblico in Roma antica. Torino; 2001. XVI, 352 p.
  9. Sini, F. Bellum nefandum. Virgilio e il problema del “diritto internazionale antico”. Sassari; 1991. 302 p.
  10. Kofanov, L. L. The system of Roman public law of the epoch of the Republic and the Principate. Moscow: Indrik; 2020. 600 р. (In Russ.)
  11. Kofanov, L. L. Lex and ius: the emergence and development of Roman law in the VIII–III centuries before christ. Moscow: Statut; 2006. 574 р. (In Russ.)
  12. Kofanov, L. L. Evolution of the Roman Republican Senate: Composition, Election, and Judicial Functions (Part 2). Rossijskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice. 2021;(12):42-66. (In Russ.)
  13. Luzzatto, G. I. Il problema d’origine del processo “extra ordinem”, I: Premesse di metodo. I cosidetti rimedi pretori. Bologna; 1965. 366 p.
  14. Capogrossi Colognesi, L. Interdetti. Enciclopedia del diritto. In 54 vol. Diretta e ordinata da F. Calasso. Vol. 21. Milano; 1971. P. 901–928.
  15. Biscardi, A. La tutela interdittale e il relativo processo. Corso di lezioni 1955–56: a cura di R. Martini. Rivista di diritto romano. 2002. Vol. 2. Pp. 9–98.
  16. Ledneva, M. V. Confiscation of property as a result of aquae et ignis interdictio during the Republic. Drevnee pravo = Ius Antiquum. 2008;(1):62-67. (In Russ.)
  17. Grasmück, E. L. Exilium. Untersuchungen zur Verbannung in der Antike. Paderborn – Monaco – Vienna – Zurigo; 1978. 167 p.
  18. Crifò, G. Exilica causa, quae adversus exulem agitur. Problemi dell’aqua et igni interdictio. Du châtiment dans la cité. Supplices corporels et peine de mort dans le monde antique. Table ronde de Rome (9–11 Novembr, 1982). Rome: Publications de l'École Française de Rome; 1984. Pp. 453–497.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).