On Some Issues of Implementation of Constitutional Innovations on the Judicial System in the Context of Materials and Decisions of the X Congress of Judges of the Russian Federation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The constitutional amendments of 2020 significantly changed the provisions of the basic law in terms of the organization and coordinated functioning of all branches of government. The implementation of the innovations introduced on the judicial system was the subject of discussion at the X Anniversary Congress of judges of Russia in December 2022, which identified both measures to implement constitutional amendments and, in general, directions for improving judicial activity in the coming years. Many new constitutional concepts and provisions, as well as decisions of the IХ and X congresses of judges in their unity, imply comprehension, appropriate interpretation and, in general, scientific support, including monitoring of the level of execution.


The purpose of this study is to analyze the new constitutional provisions on the judicial system and the ways of their implementation in the context of the materials and decisions of the IX and X congresses of judges.


On this basis, the determination of the author’s position on certain issues of judicial activity and the development of proposals for improving the legal framework of judicial.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir U. Khatuaev

Central Branch, Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: vuhatuaev1357@yandex.ru

Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Head of the Department, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation

Russian Federation, Voronezh

References

  1. Khatuaev, V. U. Constitutional amendments on public authority as a new stage of state construction in Russia. Scientific Notes of the Voronezh College “Nomos”. Issue 11. Voronezh: Publishing House of Voronezh College “Nomos”; 2022. Рp. 88–98. (In Russ.)
  2. Starilov, Yu. N. Public administration in the system of unified public authority: terminological outcome of the constitutional reform. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Pravo = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2020;(1):20-31. (In Russ.)
  3. Ershov, V. V. Legal and individual regulation of public relations. Monograph. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice; 2018. 625 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Vitruk, N. V. General theory of legal responsibility. Monograph. Moscow: Russian Academy of Justice; 2008. 304 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Khatuaev, V. U. Once again about the consequences of the workload of magistrates and the directions of solving this problem. Mirovoj sud’ya = Justice of the Peace. 2016;(4):8-13. (In Russ.)
  6. Burdina, E. V. Development of judicial system in conditions of information society. Rossijskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice. 2018;(7):19-33. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).