Factors Influencing the Evaluation of Evidence Based on the Internal Conviction of Persons Considering an Administrative Offense Case

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article deals with an actual problem related to the evaluation of evidence in cases of administrative offenses.


Decisions in cases of administrative offenses, in the case of which there is equilibrium evidence of the parties, in most cases have an accusatory bias. Goals and objectives of the study – to establish the reasons for the evaluation of evidence by the judicial authorities with a pronounced accusatory bias, to investigate their nature.


The methodological basis was made up of universal dialectical-legal, social, psychological and pedagogical methods involving the study of phenomena and processes in their development and interdependence.


Brief conclusions. The structure of the formation of internal beliefs about the reliability of the evidence presented by persons considering the case of an administrative offense has been established. These include “knowledge”, “faith” and “volitional stimulus”. On this basis, various reasons for choosing judge’s decisions in favor of public authorities (their officials) have been identified and studied. It is established that some of them are objective, while others are subjective. The solution to this problem is seen in changing and supplementing the norms of legislation on administrative offenses regulating the proceedings in relevant cases.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Nikolay N. Deryuga

Author for correspondence.
Email: Nderjuga@.mail.ru

Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Professor of the Department

Russian Federation, Khabarovsk

Artem N. Deryuga

Email: derjuga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8649-2971

Doctor of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department

Russian Federation, Khabarovsk

References

  1. Belkin, R. S. Criminalistic encyclopedia. Moscow: BEСK; 1997. 342 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Sheptulin, A. P. Dialectical method of cognition. Moscow: Politizdat; 1983. 320 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Bobrova, L. V. Cognitive biases. (Review). Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 3, Filosofiya = Social and Humanitien Sciences: Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 3, Philosophy. 2021;(2):69-79. (In Russ.)
  4. Antonenko, I. V. Personality psychology: the genesis of trust. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2019;(1):112-121. (In Russ.)
  5. Информация об авторах
  6. Н. Н. Дерюга – доктор юридических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры;
  7. А. Н. Дерюга – доктор юридических наук, доцент, заведующий кафедрой.
  8. Information about the authors
  9. N. N. Deryuga – Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Professor of the Department;
  10. A. N. Deryuga – Doctor of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department.
  11. Вклад авторов: авторы сделали эквивалентный вклад в подготовку публикации.
  12. Contribution of the authors: the authors contributed equally to this article.
  13. Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов.
  14. The authors declare no conflict of interests.
  15. Статья поступила в редакцию 11.01.2023; одобрена после рецензирования 29.06.2023; принята к публикации 17.05.2024.
  16. The article was submitted 11.01.2023; approved after reviewing 29.06.2023; accepted for publication 17.05.2024.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).