Digital Justice: Possibilities and Limits

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article, using the experience of the recent judicial reform of the People’s Republic of China, demonstrates the possibilities for the development of digital justice (as a techno-socio-legal phenomenon) and their limits. Received a legal assessment of actualization, taking into account the current state of affairs of the legal heritage of the Soviet period. The main directions of the development of digital justice have been differentiated and the need to establish the limits for the implementation of this process has been justified. The benefits of traditional justice versus simulated digital justice have been demonstrated. The thesis is justified that the process of digitalization, as an objective phenomenon, does not imply an artificial external setting of the limits of development; at the same time, in relation to specific types of social activities, it is not only permissible, but also advisable to level the directions of implementation of digitalization elements. In this connection, the installation on the formation of non-digital justice is quite reasonable

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir V. Kulakov

Author for correspondence.
Email: faust-ul2004@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9702-9306

Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Rector

Russian Federation, Moscow

Andrey A. Aryamov

Email: prorector_nauka@rsuj.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6626-7734

Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department, Vice-Rector for Scientific Work

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Long, Chang Hai, Korobeev, A. I., Chuchaev, A. I. The Criminal Code of the People’s Republic of China: the improvement in the process of implementation (to the 20th anniversary of its adoption). Lex Russica. 2018;(3):128-142. (In Russ.)
  2. Damaskin, O. V., Kholikov, I. V. The Current State and Development of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. Trudy instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN = Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law RAS. 2018;13(3):156-180. (In Russ.)
  3. Liu, Qiucen. The specifics of Chinese jurisprudence and its development at the present time. Pravovedenie = Jurisprudence. 2019;63(2):327-339. (In Russ.)
  4. Pang, Dongmei, Gao, Mingxuan. Comparative analysis of criminal law principles in China and Russia. Lex Russica. 2018;(12):119-131. (In Russ.)
  5. Pang, Dongmei. Changes in the criminal law of China: general characteristics. Lex Russica. 2016;(8):81-87. (In Russ.)
  6. Ying, Ji. The Making of Chinese Criminal Law. Electronic book. 2021. URL: https://translated.turbopages.org/proxy_u/en-ru.ru.3714a9da-65cdf718-5111a451-74722d776562/https/www.overdrive.com/media/6023209/the-making-of-chinese-criminal-law. (In Russ.)
  7. Chuchaev, A. I., Korobeev, A. I. Reforming the Criminal Code of the People’s Republic of China: ambiguous decisions of the legislator. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 2021;(12):153-163. (In Russ.)
  8. Aryamov, A. A., Kolyvantseva, M. A. Alternative forms of solving a criminal law conflict. Monograph. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2017. 190 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).