Problems of evaluating the effectiveness of the links of the justice mechanism

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to show that the evaluation of the effectiveness of the justice mechanism, any of its links and its as a whole, cannot be simple. Moreover, an objective assessment is hardly possible, at least at the present stage of development of legislation, judicial practice and legal science. Awareness of such a situation should eliminate the temptation to solve the problem in simple ways, especially on the basis of a subjective understanding of the criteria for the effectiveness of the justice mechanism. At the same time, it is noted that an objective assessment of the effectiveness of the links of the justice mechanism is vital not only within the judiciary, but also to Russian society as a whole.

A brief review of scientific sources on the problem under consideration is carried out.

The article considers three levels of problems of evaluating the effectiveness of the justice mechanism: 1) directly the judicial activity of courts and judges; 2) clarification of the governing bodies of the judiciary on judicial activities; 3) the work of bodies and other structures that ensure the judicial activity of courts and judges, both direct and indirect. In the author’s understanding, the problems of objective assessment of the work of judges, judicial structures and judicial boards, as well as courts at each of these levels are called.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Mikhail I. Kleandrov

Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: mkleandrov@igpran.ru

Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Chief Researcher, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Nechaeva, Zh. V. Questions of efficiency of execution of decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudiya = Journal of Constitutional Justice. 2008;(2):24-30. (In Russ.)
  2. Marx, K., Engels, F. Collected works. In 50 vol. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Moscow: Gospolitizdat; 1955. 698 р. (In Russ.)
  3. Kudryavtsev, V. N. Efficiency of the criminal justice system. Socialisticheskaya zakonnost’ = Socialist legality. 1971;(7):13-18. (In Russ.)
  4. Petrukhin, I. L., Baturov, G. P., Morshchakova, T. G. Theoretical foundations of the effectiveness of justice. Moscow: Nauka; 1979. 392 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Vinichenko, O. Yu., Filonova, O. I. Modernization of the judicial system during the NEP period. Monograph. Kurgan: Publishing House of Kurgan State University; 2013. 172 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Kleandrov, M. I. Justice and justice. Monograph. 2nd ed., repr. and add. Moscow: Normа, Infra-M; 2023. 424 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Zhilin, G. A. Justice in civil cases: topical issues. Moscow: Prospekt; 2010. 560 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Kurochkin, S. A. Efficiency of civil proceedings. Moscow: Statut; 2020. 358 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Zhan, Zh.-P., Gurbanov, R. A. European Commission on the Effectiveness of Justice. Organization. Activity. Development. Moscow: Yuniti; 2015. 331 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Vlasov, A. A. Actual problems of improving the efficiency of justice in civil proceedings. Modern doctrine of civil, arbitration and enforcement proceedings: theory and practice. Collection of scientific articles. Krasnodar: Yuridicheskij tsentr Press; 2004. Рp. 202–211. (In Russ.)
  11. Ivanov, A. A. On ways to improve the efficiency of justice. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2005;(12):53-65. (In Russ.)
  12. Utselak, A. Is it possible to measure the effectiveness of the judicial system? Rossijskij ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo processa = Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Proceedings. 2006;(4):14-42. (In Russ.)
  13. Fatkullin, F. N. Topical issues of the effectiveness of the Soviet criminal process, In: F. N. Fatkullin, ed. Questions of the effectiveness of the Soviet criminal process. Collection of articles. Kazan: Publishing House of Kazan University; 1976. Рp. 3–27. (In Russ.)
  14. Yudin, A. V. Historical reasons for the inefficiency of modern civil proceedings. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process = Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2007;(12):12-14. (In Russ.)
  15. Kurochkin, S. A. Criteria and indicators of the effectiveness of civil proceedings. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki = Right. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2020;(4):129-154. (In Russ.)
  16. Gumenyuk, I. V. Efficiency of justice as a guarantee of protection of violated rights (problems of theory and practice). Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. N. Novgorod; 1970. 26 p. (In Russ.)
  17. Patsatsiya, M. Sh. Efficiency of procedural activity of the verification instances of the arbitration court. Abstract of Dr. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Moscow; 2010. 55 p. (In Russ.)
  18. Plyukhina, M. A. Procedural means of ensuring the effectiveness of legal proceedings in civil cases. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Yekaterinburg; 2002. 21 p. (In Russ.)
  19. Sukhorukova, O. A. Efficiency of civil proceedings: communicative aspect. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Yekaterinburg; 2017. 28 p. (In Russ.)
  20. Solomon, Jr., P. Judges should be responsible not for achieving performance indicators, but for the quality of their work. Zakon = Law. 2019;(4):22-34. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).