The role of the notary in the implementation of the provisions of the Judicial Statutes of 1864

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The judicial statutes of 1864 consolidated the provisions on the reform of not only the court, but also a number of other institutions, then attributed by the legislator to the judicial system. A significant place among them was taken by the notary. The inclusion of the Provision on the Notarial Part in the composition of Judicial Charters, and notaries in the number of judicial officers meant that the latter were endowed with the function of preventive justice. Notaries were considered as persons authorized to prevent disputes by their actions, and sometimes to facilitate their resolution. At the same time, the role of notaries in the implementation of Judicial reform is not sufficiently disclosed by domestic researchers. The author analyzes the activities of notaries in general and a number of individual notarial actions directly aimed at assisting judicial authorities. The article presents a complete list of notarial actions that were consulted by notaries in accordance with the provisions of the Judicial Reform. The author comes to the conclusion about the significant contribution of the notary to the activities of the post-reform court and the formation of the judicial system after 1864, as well as the key role of Judicial reform in the development of the institution of the notary in Russia.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ioann V. Botantsov

North-Western Branch, Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: botansoff@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1789-6275

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor of the Department

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

References

  1. Skripilev, E. A. History of the Russian notary. Vestnik notarial’noj palaty Stavropol’skogo kraya = Bulletin of the Notary Chamber of the Stavropol Territory. 1998;(7):4-9. (In Russ.)
  2. Zlotnikov, M. Pod’yachie of Ivanovskaya square: to the history of the notary of Moscow Russia. Moscow: Letopis’-Media: Vneshtorgizdat; 2005. 151 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Dorskaya, A. A., Chestnov, I. L. Evolution of the system of law of Russia: theoretical and historical-legal approaches. Monograph. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2010. 304 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Tsechoev, V. K. The history of the court of Russia. Moscow: Prospekt; 2010. 159 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Mkhitaryan, L. Yu. The influence of the judicial reform of 1864 on the formation of notary bodies in the Perm province. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Bulletin of the Perm University. Legal Sciences. 2012;(2):30-40. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-sudebnoy-reformy-1864-goda-na-stanovlenie-organov-notariata-v-permskoy-gubernii. (In Russ.)
  6. Femelidi, A. M. Russian notary. The history of the notary and the current notarial regulations on April 14. Guide to the study of Russian notary law. St. Petersburg: Ya. A. Kantorovich; 1902. 258 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).