Controversial issues of the current procedure for appealing a court decision in absentia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of legal regulation of appealing against an absentee decision in a civil procedure, namely the legal consequences of the receipt of the defendant’s appeal to the court, when the defendant missed the deadline for filing an application to cancel the absentee decision and the restoration of this time limit was denied. The authors conclude that if the defendant did not file an application for the annulment of the decision in absentia or he was denied the restoration of the deadline for filing such an application, the court of first instance should proceed from the fact that the appeal was filed against a court decision that is not subject to appeal in the appeal proceedings.

The issue of applying the clarification given in the Review of Judicial Practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 2 (2015) is considered, the article substantiates that at present these clarifications are not subject to application.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natalya V. Alekseeva

Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: alekseevy2004@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1956-9817

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

Larisa N. Pavlova

Russian State University of Justice

Email: lornikpavlova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7390-9894

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Utkina, I. V. Institute of correspondence decision in civil procedure. Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Moscow; 1997. 191 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Chernykh, I. I. Correspondence proceedings in civil proceedings. Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Moscow; 1998. 184 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Zagajnova, S. K. Judicial acts in the mechanism of implementation of judicial power in civil and arbitration proceedings. Moscow: Wolters Klueer; 2007. 400 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Shishkin, S. A. Adversarial nature in the judicial mechanism of civil rights protection. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Moscow; 1996. 23 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Reshetnyak, V. I., Chernykh, I. I. Correspondence proceedings and a court order in civil proceedings. Moscow: Gorodets; 1997. 80 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Vikut, M. A., Zajtsev, I. M. The civil process of Russia. Textbook. Moscow: Yurist; 1999. 384 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Demichev, A. A., Isaenkova, O. V., Karpychev, M. V., et al. Civil procedure. Textbook. Ed. A. A. Demichev. 2nd ed., repr. and add. Moscow: Forum, Infra-M; 2015. 320 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Zajtsev, I. M. Self-control of the court of first instance in civil proceedings. Rossijskaya yusticiya = Russian Justice. 1998;(12):18–20. (In Russ.)
  9. Trishina, E. G. The problem of judicial control in civil proceedings. Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Saratov; 2000. 193 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Terekhova, L. A. Self-control of the court and its limits. In: A. I. Zajtsev, ed. Trends in the development of civil procedural legislation and legal proceedings in modern Russia. Materials of the International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the memory of Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation Igor’ Mikhajlovich Zajtsev (23 Oct. 2009). Saratov: Nauka; 2009. Pp. 438–442. (In Russ.)
  11. Osokina, G. L. Civil procedure. Special part. Moscow: Norma; 2010. 960 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Trishina, E. G. On the issue of the defendant’s appeal of a decision in absentia in the light of the adoption of Federal Law No. 451-FZ dated 28.11.2018 “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”. In: O. V. Isaenkova, ed. Prospects for the development of civil procedural law. Collection of articles based on the materials of the III International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 85th anniversary of the birth of Doctor of Law, Professor I. M. Zajtsev. Saratov: Saratov Law Academy; 2019. Pp. 371–376. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).