Conscientious negotiation: principle, presumption, duty

Cover Page
  • Authors: Demkina A.V.1,2
  • Affiliations:
    1. S. S. Alekseev Private Law Research Center under the President of the Russian Federation
    2. O. E. Kutafin Moscow State Law University
  • Issue: No 5 (2023)
  • Pages: 38-48
  • Section: Civil law
  • Submitted: 24.01.2026
  • Accepted: 24.01.2026
  • Published: 14.05.2023
  • URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2072-909X/article/view/375592
  • ID: 375592

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to the rules of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on negotiation. The purpose of the article is to explore the relations of negotiation from a legal point of view and to find answers to questions related to the duty of fair negotiation. An important role in answering these questions is played by the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, generalization of the practice of lower courts, explanations and recommendations, including those that include the qualification of legal relations arising from negotiations, from the point of view of their legal nature. The article analyzes the legal norm on negotiation, examines the positions of different authors on the issues raised, provides examples of decisions from both foreign judicial practice and domestic courts.

By using a number of scientific methods (general scientific analytical method of cognition, system-structural, technical-legal, formal-dogmatic, and comparative-legal), the author comes to the following conclusions:

the principle of fair negotiation is a special case of the principle of good faith;

due to the fact that good faith is an evaluative concept, it is impossible to fix strict requirements for its definition in the law. In this connection, when specifying the principle of good faith, the legislator often uses presumptions, and a kind of approximate list of cases is formed by judicial interpretation, which makes it possible to determine what to attribute to conscientious or unscrupulous behavior;

the obligation to conduct negotiations in good faith arises in connection with the commission of mutual actions by the negotiators to enter into negotiations. In this capacity, any action can be considered that is sufficiently definite (in some cases, requirements for it may be established by law) and expresses the intention of the person to consider himself negotiating with the addressee, who will perform the same fairly definite action in response;

the obligations to conduct negotiations in good faith are related either to informing within the framework of a pre-contractual obligation, or to the negotiation process itself.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alesya V. Demkina

S. S. Alekseev Private Law Research Center under the President of the Russian Federation; O. E. Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Author for correspondence.
Email: demkina@duma.gov.ru

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher at the S. S. Alekseev Research Center for Private Law under the President of the Russian Federation; Associate Professor of the Department of Notary of the O. E. Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Muratova, O. V. Pre-contractual relations in international commercial turnover: from substantive to conflict regulation. Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Moscow; 2017. 178 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Boyarsky, D. A. Civil law regulation of negotiations on the conclusion of an entrepreneurial contract. Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Yekaterinburg; 2022. 206 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Sarkisyan, V. V. Negotiations on the conclusion of a contract in civil law. Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Rostov-оn-Don; 2022. 28 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Sklovsky, K. I. Transaction and its effect. Commentary of Chapter 9 Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The principle of good faith. 4th ed., add. Moscow: Statut; 2019. (In Russ.) LRS “ConsultantPlus”.
  5. Mazur, O. V. The requirement of reasonableness in relation to the requirement of good faith in civil law. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. St. Petersburg; 2012. 23 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Genkin, D. M. Property right as an absolute subjective right. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = Soviet State and Law. 1958;(6):92-102. (In Russ.)
  7. Yavich, L. S. Soviet law – the regulator of public relations in the USSR. Stalinabad; 1957. 168 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Maleina, M. N. Negotiations on the conclusion of a contract (concept, legal regulation, rules). Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2016;(10). (In Russ.) LRS “ConsultantPlus”.
  9. Demkina, A. V. Pre-contractual legal relationship-obligation: fundamentals of theory. Monograph. Moscow: Prospekt; 2020. 272 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Jean-Luc Soulierhttps. 2016. Unforeseeability doctrine. URL: www.soulier-avocats.com/en/ordinance-of-february-10-2016-for-the-reform-of-french-contract-law-the-principle-of-the-binding-force-of-contracts-is-considerably-undermined-by-the-new-provisions-of-the-french-civil-code/.
  11. Krasheninnikov, E. A., Bajgusheva, Yu. V. Duties in conducting pre-contractual negotiations. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii = Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2013;(6):82-93. (In Russ.) LRS “ConsultantPlus”.
  12. Schwartz, A. S., Robert, E. Precontractual Liability and Preliminary Agreements. Faculty Scholarship Series. 2007. P. 301–303. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2381.
  13. Farnsworth, A. Precontractual Liability and Preliminary' Agreements: Fair Dealing and Failed Negotiations. Columbia Law Review. 1987;87(2):219-298.
  14. Mazur, O. V. Pre-contractual liability: analysis of individual signs of unfair behavior. Zakon = Law. 2012;(5):197-205. (In Russ.) LRS “ConsultantPlus”.
  15. Cartwright, J., Hesselink, M., eds. Precontractual Liability in European Private Law (The Common Core of European Private Law). Cambridge University Press; 2008. Pp. 449–488.
  16. Grammond, S. Reasonable Expectations and the Interpretation of Contracts Across Legal Traditions. Canadian Business Law Journal. 2010. URL: http://ssrn.com.
  17. Gnitsevich, K. V. Pre-contractual liability in civil law (culpa in contrahendo). Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. St. Petersburg; 2009. 209 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).