Criteria for Determining the Boundaries of Judicial Precincts and Other Ways of Regulating the Burden Magistrates

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The distribution of the burden between the justices of the peace is carried out with the help of the norms on generic and territorial jurisdiction, on the definition of the boundaries of judicial areas, on the methods of transferring cases. When creating and abolishing judicial precincts, regions are guided by a territorial criterion, the effective use of which is designed to equalize the workload of magistrates of one judicial district. The law provides for the possibility of transferring cases between judges of one judicial district on the basis of a reasoned order of the chairman of the district court, such a method of load regulation should be attributed to an auxiliary regulator, for the implementation of which it is necessary to use official statistical data, all categories of cases under consideration should be taken into account to determine the average load for the judicial district. It is necessary to constantly monitor the population in the judicial district, the location of infrastructure facilities and other facilities that serve or may serve as sources of increased workload (shopping and entertainment centers, social institutions, residential complexes, etc.). If the established population indicators in judicial precincts, judicial district exceed or decrease, such data should serve as a basis for the creation, abolition of judicial precincts, and in case of deviation from the average indicators in the judicial district, they should be the basis for clarifying (changing) the boundaries of judicial precincts. An even distribution of the workload will have a positive impact on the quality of justice, the organization of the judicial process, and staffing. The main factors in the formation of judicial sections that affect the load are the population and the territory of the judicial district, the auxiliary ones are the order of the chairman of the court on load regulation, other auxiliary factors: statistical data, assessment of the categories and complexity of the cases under consideration, accounting for objects that are “sources of increased load”. The correct organization of solving the problem of the workload of magistrates in the judicial district is the most important task both for the implementation of the principles of judicial proceedings and for ensuring access to justice.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Tatiana V. Kozyreva

Judicial Precinct No. 9

Author for correspondence.
Email: kozyreva.tatyana@mail.ru

Justice of the Peace

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

References

  1. Burdina, E. V., Petukhov, N. A. The workload of judges: problems of definition, evaluation, management. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice; 2017. 236 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Burdina, E. V. Bodies of the judicial community in the judicial system of Russia. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2016. 400 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Burdina, E. V. On the criteria for the creation of magistrates' precincts, taking into account the workload and territorial characteristics of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Mirovoj sud'ya = Magistrate. 2018;(8):11-16. (In Russ.)
  4. Aleksandrov, S. V. The precinct system of world justice and access to court. Probely v Rossijskom zakonodatel'stve = Gaps in Russian Legislation. 2008;(1):333-335. (In Russ.)
  5. Alekseevskaya, E. I. Monitoring the rule of law and access to court: 25 years of judicial reform. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2017. 176 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Gravina, A. A., Kashepov, V. P., Makarova, O. V., et al. Organization and activity of courts of general jurisdiction: novels and prospects. Monograph. Ed. V. P. Kashepov. Moscow: IZiSP, Кontrakt; 2016. 240
  7. p. (In Russ.)
  8. Borisova, E. A., Efimov, A. F., Zhuikov, V. M., et al. Justice of the Peace in civil proceedings. Eds. A. F. Efimov, I. K. Piskarev. Moscow: Gorodec; 2004. 816 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Trofimova, M. S. Analysis of the initiative of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on changing the generic jurisdiction of civil cases to magistrates. Mirovoj sud'ya = Magistrate. 2018;(7):32-35. (In Russ.)
  10. Meshcheryakova, A. F. Problems of increasing the efficiency of the activity of magistrates in the conditions of reforming the judicial system of Russia. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process = Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2018;(3):17-21. (In Russ.)
  11. Markova, N. L. Criteria for the formation of judicial sections of magistrates. Administrator suda = Court Administrator. 2008;(2):23-26. (In Russ.)
  12. Antonova, L. G., Gorlenko, V. A. Criminal court reform: results and prospects. Yuridicheskij mir = Legal World. 2008;(9):53-59. (In Russ.)
  13. Semenov, S. N. Replacement of a temporarily absent judge should ensure the effectiveness and accessibility of justice. Rossijskij sud'ya = Russian Judge. 2006;(5):8-14. (In Russ.)
  14. Fedina, G. A. On the assessment of the quality of judicial work. Qualification boards of judges: from congress to congress. Collection of articles. Moscow: Рublishing House “Bukvoved”; 2016. Рр. 419–426. (In Russ.)
  15. Kleandrov, M. I. On two vectors of development of world justice in Russia. Mirovoj sud'ya = Magistrate. 2015;(6):3-9. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).