Legal Еxperiment

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The goal is set: on the basis of a scientifically based concept of integrative legal understanding, synthesizing ontologically homogeneous legal regulators – principles and norms of law, to highlight the features of the legal experiment. The analysis of the prevailing doctrinal ideas about the legal experiment was carried out, which made it possible to clarify its features and social purpose. In the course of the study, various methods of cognition of legal reality were used (dialectical-materialistic, general scientific and private scientific).

Consideration of the legal experiment as an effective method of cognition of the surrounding reality, a method of its transformation, allowed us to define the legal experiment as a unique type of legal activity, an integral part of the emanation of law, consisting of a number of stages, namely: definitive, law-creation, experimental implementation of the law and the final.

The diversity of legal experiments and the need for their classification is emphasized. It is proposed, in particular, to distinguish legal experiments by territorial, substantive and substantive criteria. Special attention is paid to digital legal experiments in the article. The destructiveness of the proposals made in science on the administration of justice by algorithms of IT platforms is proved.

The necessity of adopting a special Federal law “On Legal Experiments” as a legal act fixing all the essential conditions for conducting legal experiments, taking into account the dynamism of this phenomenon, is substantiated.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Tatiana V. Vlasova

Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: t_vlasova@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7371-9719

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

Svetlana V. Miroshnik

Russian State University of Justice

Email: miroshnik@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7824-7308

Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Associate Professor of the Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Nikitinskij, V. I., Samoshchenko, I. S., eds. Legal experiment and improvement of legislation. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1988. 304 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Lazarev, V. V. Selected works. Vol. 2. Gaps in legislation: establishment, overcoming, elimination. In 3 vols. Moscow: Novaya yusticiya; 2010. 504 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Stepanenko, D. M. Method of social and legal experiment in the system of research of the effectiveness of the innovative function of the state. Vesnіk Magіlyoўskaga dzyarzhaўnaga ўnіversіteta іmya A. A. Kulyashova = Bulletin of the A. A. Kuleshov Mogilev State University. 2018;(1):37-45. (In Russ.)
  4. El’cov, V. N. Legal experiment in modern Russia: problems of efficiency. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Tambov; 2009. 24 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Sivickij, V. A., Sorokin, M. Yu. Legal experiment and development of law. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2016;(4):15-30. (In Russ.)
  6. Tikhomirov, Yu. A. Legal experiment and expertise. In: Yu. A. Tikhomirov, ed. Legal models and reality. Monograph. Moscow: Infra-M; 2014. 280 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Novikova, E. V. On the practice of ecological and legal experiments. Ekologicheskoe pravo = Environmental Law. 2021;(5):34-40. (In Russ.)
  8. Degterev, D. A. Game-theoretic approach in legal research. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek = Law and Management. XXI Century. 2013;(2):90-96. (In Russ.)
  9. Shemelin, A. V., Putrenko, E. V. State experiment as a factor of improving public administration. International experience. Vestnik Zabajkal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Trans-Baikal State University. 2014;(5):141-147. (In Russ.)
  10. Fat’yanov, I. V. The concept and signs of a law-making experiment. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2013;1(2):334-337. (In Russ.)
  11. Ershov, V. V., Polyakov, M. B. Emanation of law. Rossijskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice. 2023;(1):5-20. (In Russ.)
  12. Syryh, V. M. Preparation of dissertations in legal sciences. The applicant’s handbook. Moscow: Russian Academy of Justice; 2012. 500 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Ponkin, I. V., Red’kina, A. I. Classification as a method of scientific research, in particular, in legal science. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Perm University. Legal Sciences. 2017;(37):249-259. (In Russ.)
  14. Panchenko, V. Yu., Krasnova, V. A. Legal experiment as a means of preventing legal obstacles in the realization of rights and legitimate interests. Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal = Eurasian Legal Journal. 2015;(8):131-135. (In Russ.)
  15. Fetisov, A. K. Digital legal capacity. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process = Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2021;(5):3-7. (In Russ.)
  16. Chekhovskaya, S. A. The use of artificial intelligence systems for decision-making: building a system of regulatory principles. Predprinimatel’skoe pravo = Business Law. 2021;(1):24-35. (In Russ.)
  17. Makarov, I. I. Principles of conducting legal experiments in the organization of local government: views of Soviet lawyers. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie = Managerial Consulting. 2013;(1):22-28. (In Russ.)
  18. Povetkina, N. A. Legal experiment as a new trend in the development of budget law. Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law. 2020;(9):21-24. (In Russ.)
  19. Sokolov, D. V. Legal experiment as a means of ensuring road safety. Transportnoe pravo = Transport Law. 2022;(2):3-6. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).