The Right of Parties in Criminal Proceedings to “Be Heard” in Court Debates

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The guarantee of the implementation of the constitutional right to judicial protection in criminal proceedings is provided by a number of procedural rights of participants in criminal proceedings. These include the right of the parties to be “heard” by the court, which is most clearly manifested at the stage of judicial debate, which is interrelated with the principle of competitiveness and equality of the parties. Having no separate consolidation in the criminal procedure legislation, this right often remains without due attention of the courts, which is negatively reflected in legal practice in the form of judicial errors, entailing the cancellation of the sentence.
Focusing on the right of the parties to “be heard” in court debates, clarifying its procedural role and significance should lead to strengthening guarantees of the rights of participants in the process to exercise the right to judicial protection in adversarial proceedings. Based on the analysis of the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, procedural doctrine, judicial practice and certain aspects of judicial communication, readers are invited to look at the right of the parties to “be heard” in court debates as an important element of the adversarial nature of the parties in court debates.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Tatyana G. Borodinova

North Caucasus Branch, Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: tgborodinova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-6554-1064

Doctor of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department.

Russian Federation, Krasnodar

References

  1. Sherstyuk, V. M. The right to be heard and to be heard – the principle of civil procedural law. In: M. K. Treushnikov, ed. Notes on modern civil and arbitration law. Moscow: Gorodets; 2004. Рp. 57–63. (In Russ.)
  2. Afanasyev, S. F. The right to be heard in court through the prism of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (part 2). Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’ = Legal Policy and Legal Life. 2013;(1):60-65. (In Russ.)
  3. Sundyukova, A. R. Judicial debate in the light of the concept of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Glagol” pravosudiya = Verb of Justice. 2011;(1):60-65. (In Russ.)
  4. Zakharova, G. A. deliberations of the parties and last words of the defendant in court. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta imeni S. Yu. Vitte. Ser. 2. Yuridicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Witte Moscow University. Series 2. Legal Sciences. E-edition. 2023;(1.1 Special issue):57-61. (In Russ.)
  5. Sotskov, F. N. On equal rights, but not equal opportunities of the parties at the stage of debate in the criminal process. Aktual’nye voprosy bor’by s prestupleniyami = Topical Issues of Combating Crimes. 2015;(2):62-65. (In Russ.)
  6. Sukhorukova, O. A. Communication competence of the judge and other participants in the procedure as a condition for effective judicial proceedings. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Pravo = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2022;(1):329-336. (In Russ.)
  7. Maltseva, V. A. Judicial debate: speech strategy and tactics. Voprosy psiholingvistiki = Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2011;(1):152-160. (In Russ.)
  8. Zagorsky, G. I. Actual problems of judicial proceedings in criminal cases. Textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prospekt; 2020. 360 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Sultanov, A. R. European legal standards, history lessons and law enforcement practice. Moscow: Statut; 2012. 335 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).