Timely Resolution of the Dispute Between the Parties by the Court as a Sign of the Effectiveness of Justice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The timely resolution of the dispute between the parties is one of the signs that determine the effectiveness of justice. The necessity of qualification by the court of disputed legal relations and elimination of the dispute of the parties is substantiated. It is noted that due to the lack of legislative consolidation of the concept of the subject of the claim and a common understanding of the limits of the claims, the use by the court of a different method of protecting the right than chosen by the plaintiff, as a result of the court’s qualification of disputed legal relations, may lead to the cancellation of the court decision. The changes made to the legal regulation of the content of the settlement agreement were positively assessed, and questions were raised that require further research.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natalia V. Alekseeva

Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev

Author for correspondence.
Email: alekseevy2004@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1956-9817

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Civil and Administrative Proceedings Department;

Russian Federation, Moscow

Larisa V. Yaroshenko

Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev

Email: yanshinal@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5931-1856

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Civil and Administrative Proceedings Department.

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Tsikhotsky, A. V. Theoretical problems of the effectiveness of justice in civil cases. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1997. 392 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Chechina, N. A. The main directions of the development of the science of Soviet civil procedural law. Leningrad: Publishing House of Leningrad State University; 1987. 104 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Abova, T. E. Ensuring the right to judicial protection for legal entities and individuals. Problems of accessibility and effectiveness of justice in arbitration and civil proceedings. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, 31 January – 1 February 2001). Moscow: Lidzhist; 2001. Рp. 153–160. (In Russ.)
  4. Shakaryan, M. S. Problems of accessibility and effectiveness of justice in courts of general jurisdiction. Problems of accessibility and effectiveness of justice in arbitration and civil proceedings. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, 31 January – 1 February 2001). Moscow: Lidzhist; 2001. Рp. 61–69. (In Russ.)
  5. Patsatsiya, M. S. Actual problems of the effectiveness of justice carried out in the order of arbitration and civil proceedings. Problems of accessibility and effectiveness of justice in arbitration and civil proceedings. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, 31 January – 1 February 2001). Moscow: Lidzhist; 2001. Рp. 46–60. (In Russ.)
  6. Zhilin, G. A. Justice in civil cases. Current issues. Monograph. Moscow: Prospekt; 2010. 573 p. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
  7. Fursov, D. A., Kharlamova, I. V. Theory of justice in a short three-volume summary of civil cases. In 3 vols. Vol. 1: Theory and practice of the organization of justice. Moscow: Statut; 2009. 524 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Poskrebnev, M. E. The procedural and legal nature of the competition of claims. Rossijskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice. 2024;(3):72-81. (In Russ.)
  9. Isaenkova, O. V. The concept of a claim. In: O. V. Isaenkova, A. A. Demichev, T. V. Solovyeva, et al. A claim in civil proceedings. Collection. Ed. O. V. Isaenkova. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer; 2009. 216 p. Рp. 33–49. (In Russ.)
  10. Pleshanov, A. G. The principle of dispositivity (§ 4 ch. 3). In: V. M. Zhuikov, S. S. Zavriev. Problems of implementing the principles of civil litigation in law enforcement. Monograph. Moscow: Norma; Infra-M; 2024. Рp. 209–227. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).