Determining the Value of Stolen Property: Problems of Law Enforcement

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

 The article is devoted to the analysis of the correctness and validity of determining the value of stolen property in shops and other retail enterprises in theory and law enforcement practice. The author notes that one of the currently existing theoretical and practical problems is the presence in forensic investigative practice of uncertainty in determining the actual value of stolen goods during thefts committed in stores and other retail enterprises.

The purpose of the study was to analyze the emerging judicial practice, identify problems existing in theory and law enforcement practice, and propose ways to solve the identified problems.

When writing the article, methods such as analysis, synthesis, and generalization were used.

The author analyzed the arguments for and against the inclusion of value added tax in the value of the stolen, the position of the Judicial Board for Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on this issue is given.

Based on the analysis, the author concluded that the existing uncertainty in determining the actual value of stolen goods leads to instability of judicial practice and the cancellation of judicial decisions of lower courts. Currently, it is necessary to unify judicial practice regarding the actual value of stolen goods in stores and other retail enterprises.

The article indicates the need for the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to provide a specific explanation regarding the determination of the actual value of stolen goods in stores and other retail enterprises, in particular, regarding the need to include value added tax in the value of stolen goods.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Elena A. Pisarevskaya

North-West Branch, Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev

Author for correspondence.
Email: liorev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-6731-5507

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Criminal Law Department.

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

References

  1. Chelobitchikov, M. E. The cost of stolen property. Zakonnost’ = Legality. 2016;(3):31-32. (In Russ.)
  2. Arsentyeva, S. S. Is the judicial practice in cases of embezzlements from network stores adequate? Administrator suda = Court’s Administrator. 2023;(3):83-87. (In Russ.)
  3. Ekimov, A. A. Currency values as a subject of crime: issues of determining the value. Electronic Supplement to the Russian Juridical Journal. 2017;(4):165-169. (In Russ.) URL: https://electronic.ruzh.org/?q=ru/system/files/17.%20%D0%95%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2.pdf.
  4. Prokhortsev, I. A. Questions of the application of Article 7.27 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. Yuridicheskij mir = Juridical World. 2009;(9):46-50. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).