Strategy for Digital Transformation of Judicial Activity: Main Approaches Taking into Account National and Foreign Experience
- Authors: Burdina E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev
- Issue: No 11 (2025)
- Pages: 5-19
- Section: Theoretical and historical legal studies
- Published: 25.11.2025
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2072-909X/article/view/360003
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2025.11.5-19
- ID: 360003
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The imperative of Russia’s development based on taking into account national interests, the needs of citizens and their families predetermines the innovative format of the evolution of national courts as an element of the digital economy, large-scale tasks for their digital transformation, including the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies. Russian courts are proactively testing the capabilities of modern technologies in legal proceedings, court proceedings and court management, forming a certain maturity in the process of developing and using these technologies. At the same time, the decentralized nature of the introduction of innovations actualizes the need for unified management of digitalization processes and their standardization within the judicial system.
Purpose of the work: based on national and foreign experience, theoretically substantiate the main elements of the strategy for the digital transformation of judicial activity, including the distinctive features of its digital model, as well as the goals, directions, principles, and stages of transformation.
The methodological base consists of traditional techniques and methods of scientific knowledge (dialectical, system analysis, comparative legal, modeling method, etc.).
In the context of socially oriented justice, the work argues for the distinctive features of the digital model of judicial activity (or the court of the future), which should be supported using information technologies, including artificial intelligence technologies. It is argued that digital technologies themselves are neither the goal of transformation nor a value requiring funding. The digital model of judicial activity cannot be identified with legal proceedings and court proceedings, where information technologies, including artificial intelligence technologies, are intuitively integrated. The digital model of judicial activity, reflecting a court focused on the needs of citizens, is characterized by new responsibilities of the courts: in the field of social management, preventive, in the field of strategic planning and data analytics, development of ethical principles for the use of artificial intelligence in judicial activity, etc.
The digital transformation of judicial activity is a multi-faceted, complex, modular, stage-by-stage, developing process, where the participation of judges themselves in the development and testing of modern information technologies is fundamentally important.
Full Text
About the authors
Elena V. Burdina
Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev
Author for correspondence.
Email: elenburdina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5431-7634
Doctor of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Organization of Judicial and Law Enforcement Activities Department
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Litvinova, T. N. Russian civilization facing the challenges of modernity: problems of self-identification in socio-political discourse. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2025;(1):81-95. (In Russ.)
- Przhilenskiy, V. I. Artificial intelligence, big data and experimental method. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 2025;(4):48-59. (In Russ.)
- Ebzeev, B. S. The state in the socio-cultural system of Russia: continuity, sovereignty, basic meanings. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 2025;(5):95-113. (In Russ.)
- Burdina, E. V., Zuev, S. V., eds. Electronic justice. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice; 2021. 344 p. (In Russ.)
- Reiling, A. D., Papagianneas, S. Lessons from China’s smart court reform? International Journal of Court Administration. 2025;16(1). URL: https://iacajournal.org/articles/10.36745/ijca.698.
- Dobrovolskaya, T. N. People’s court – the main link of the judicial system of the USSR. Moscow: State Publishing House of Legal Literature; 1956. 120 p. (In Russ.)
- Gezalov, A. A., Dzyuba, E. I., Faizullin, F. S., et al. Transformation of modern Russia into a social state: objective reality or utopia? Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 2025;(1):5-13. (In Russ.)
- Burdina, E. V. New organizational forms of exercising of justice: the experience of courts in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Rossijskij sud’ya = Russian Judge. 2021;(1):49-53. (In Russ.)
- Emshanov, I. S. Front office of Blagoveshchensk city court districts in questions and answers. Effektivnoe pravosudie: novye podkhody = Effective Justice: New Approaches. 2024;(34):9-12. (In Russ.)
- Luis, M. P. Reflecting on innovation and integrity in court administration. International Journal of Court Administration. 2025;16(1). URL: https://iacajournal.org/articles/10.36745/ijca.698.
- Kazova, Z. M., Ivanov, Z. A., Tatarov, T. K., et al. Digital ecosystems. Innovacionnaya ekonomika: informatsiya, analitika, prognozy = Innovative Economy: Information, Analytics, Forecasts. 2024;(2):123-129. (In Russ.)
- Efimov, A. R., Ageeva, A. V., Krainov, A. G., et al. Artificial intelligence in science: on the threshold of a new field of knowledge? Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 2024;(4):30-41. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
