The Concept and Structure of Criminal-Organizational Relations

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In this article, the author attempts, on the basis of theoretical developments of the general theory of law on organizational norms and the discussion of domestic jurists on criminal procedural relations, to identify a special type of norms and relations in the criminal process system, called criminal-organizational. The task of such norms is to create organizational conditions for the effective functioning of criminal procedural institutions. In this regard, the author examines the prerequisites that contribute to the identification of criminal and organizational relations in the system of criminal procedure. Further, the author examines the functional purpose of criminal-organizational norms and relations in the system of current legislation, examines their internal structure and suggests the appropriate conceptual apparatus for the selected elements of relations. In particular, there are such concepts as “organization of criminal proceedings”, “criminal organizational norms of criminal procedural law”, “object of criminal organizational relations”, “subjects of criminal organizational relations”, “criminal organizational relations in criminal proceedings” in both broad and narrow sense. Further, the author formulates a range of issues related to the sphere of criminal and organizational relations, and also highlights the main directions of their theoretical and practical development. In conclusion, the author formulates a number of proposals for improving the Russian criminal process, taking into account the role of criminal and organizational relations. Conclusions are drawn that criminal organizational relations act as a superstructure to the basic institution and criminal justice in general, allowing it to work properly in accordance with the intention of the legislator. In this regard, the author proposes to distinguish criminal-organizational relations as a kind of legal relations with a number of features that require reflection in the presentation of laws and other regulatory legal acts, i.e. to introduce new rules of legislative technique. Proceeding from this, it is proposed to separate the criminal organizational norms into an independent section of the legislative act (Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation), which, according to the author, will significantly simplify law enforcement practice and will contribute to the qualitative improvement of the work of criminal procedural institutions and criminal proceedings as such.

About the authors

Nikita Bushtets

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: nbushtets@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7019-1389
Postgraduate student

References

  1. Bozh'ev V. (2006) RF Supreme Court Plenum on the jury in court. Zakonnost', no 4, pp. 2-7 (in Russ.)
  2. Borisova L.N. (2004) General theory of procedural legal norms. Candidate of Juridical Sciences. Summary. Stavropol', 26 p.
  3. Golovko L.V. (ed.) (2016) The course of legal process. Moscow: Statut, 1278 p. (in Russ.)
  4. Ershov V.V. (ed.). (2016) Juridical activity. Moscow: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvenniy universitet pravosudiya, 390 p. (in Russ.)
  5. Kashepov V.P. (2016) Organisation and activity of the courts of general jurisdiction: novellas and perspectives. Moscow: Kontrakt, 233 p. (in Russ.)
  6. Khaldeev H.M. (ed.) (2015) Historical aspects of the development of jury in Russia. Istoriya gosudarstva I prava=History of State and Law, no 23, pp. 46-49 (in Russ.)
  7. Melekhin A.V. (2009) Theory of state and law. SPS Konsultant plus (in Russ.)
  8. Pashin S.A. (2010) Suggestions on the improvements of Russian jury courts. Moscow: RPA, 84 p. (in Russ.)
  9. Pashin S.A. (1995) Judicial reform and jury. Moscow: RPA, 76 p. (in Russ.)
  10. Pashin S.A. (1995) Jury: the first year of activity. Moscow: RPA, 48 p. (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/mp.48.6.M291
  11. Petrukhin I.L. (ed.) (2003) Judicial power. Moscow: Prospekt, 720 p. (in Russ.)
  12. Ponomarev A.B., Pikuleva E.A. (2014) The methodology of research. Perm: University, 186 p. (in Russ.)
  13. Shakbanova H.M. (2015) Historical aspects in the development of jury in Russia. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava=History of State and Law, no 23, pp. 46-49 (in Russ.)
  14. Stepalin V.P. (1998) Judicial marathon with barriers. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya=Russian justice, no 3, pp. 7-9 (in Russ.)
  15. Strogovich M.S. (1968) The course of criminal process. Moscow: Nauka, 468 p. (in Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Bushtets N.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).