Current diagnosis of pelvic venous diseases (literature review)

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

The literature review is devoted to the issues of diagnostics of pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs), including pelvic and vulvar varicose veins, pelvic venous insufficiency, compression stenosis of the left renal and iliac veins. The possibilities of clinical, ultrasound and X-ray methods of research are presented, diagnostic criteria of various types of PeVDs are considered, comparative characteristics of instrumental diagnostic tests in identifying pelvic venous reflux, non-thrombotic stenosis of the left renal and iliac veins are presented. A critical analysis of literature data on the capabilities of duplex ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance and direct contrast venography in determining the hemodynamic significance of compression stenosis of the renal and iliac veins was performed. Based on the available literature data, a conclusion was made on the necessity to continue scientific research on the diagnosis of PeVDs. 

Sobre autores

Sergey Chubchenko

Pirogov First City Hospital

Email: mdchoob@gmail.com

Surgeon, head of Moscow City Phlebology Center

(8 Leninskiy avenue, Moscow, Russia)

Aleksander Alenichev

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: alenichev@yandex.ru

Postgraduate student, Savelyev University Surgical Clinic

(building 6, 1 Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, Russia)

Sergey Gavrilov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: gavriloffsg@mail.ru

Doctor of medical sciences, professor, Savelyev University Surgical Clinic

(building 6, 1 Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, Russia)

Bibliografia

  1. Russian clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic venous diseases. Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2018;12(3):146‒240. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/flebo20187031146
  2. Antignani P.L., Lazarashvili Z., Monedero J.L. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pel-vic congestion syndrome: UIP consensus document. International Angiology. 2019;38(4):265‒283. doi: 10.23736/s0392-9590.19.04237-8
  3. Gavrilov S.G. Combination of May-Thurner syndrome and pelvic congestion syn-drome: terra incognita. Phlebolymphology. 2021;28:90‒102.
  4. De Maeseneer M.G., Kakkos S.K., Aherne T. et al. Editor's Choice ‒ European Socie-ty for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2022;63(2):184‒267. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.024
  5. Herrera-Betancourt A.L., Villegas-Echeverri J.D., López-Jaramillo J.D. et al. Sensi-tivity and specificity of clinical findings for the diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome in women with chronic pelvic pain. Phlebology. 2018;33(5):303‒308. doi: 10.1177/0268355517702057
  6. Chidambaram R., Cryer R., Soares J., Ponosh S. Abdominopelvic venous pathology and chronic venous disease: a guide for general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 2024;74(741):184‒186.
  7. Patel S.E., Chesnut S.R. Relationships Among Pelvic Congestion Syndrome Pain, Daily Activities, and Quality of Life. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2024;53(4):416‒426. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2024.03.002
  8. Gavrilov S.G., Kirienko A.I., Dobrokhotova Yu.E. et al. Differential diagnostics of chronic pelvic pain in the light of pelvic venous congestion syndrome. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa = Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2006;6(4):49‒53. (In Russ.)
  9. Farkas K., Stanek A., Zbinden S. et al. Vascular Diseases in Women: Do Women Suffer from Them Differently? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(4):1108. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041108
  10. Strong S.M., Cross A.C., Sideris M. et al. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patient Risk Factors and Pelvic Venous Reflux Patterns on Treatment Outcomes With Pelvic Vein Embolisation. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2024;58(7):733‒741. doi: 10.1177/15385744241264312
  11. Knuttinen M.G., Machan L., Khilnani N.M. et al. Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Venous Disorders: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023;221(5):565‒574. doi: 10.2214/ajr.22.28796
  12. Sazhin A.V., Gavrilov S.G., Temirbolatov M.D. Endoscopical technologies in diag-nostics and treatment of pelvic venous polyblood cancer. Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2017;11(3):146‒153. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/flebo2017113146-153
  13. Hobbs J.T. The pelvic congestion syndrome. Practitioner. 1976;216:529–540.
  14. Beard R.W., Highman J.H., Pearce S. et al. Diagnosis of pelvic varicosities in women with chronic pelvic pain. Lancet. 1984;2(8409):946‒949. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91165-6
  15. White A.M., Holdstock J.M. Ultrasound assessment of pelvic venous reflux. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;5:234‒243. doi: 10.4103/ijves.ijves_84_18
  16. Marcelin C., Le Bras Y., Molina Andreo I. et al. Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Venous Disorders in Females. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(10):2337. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102337
  17. Jayaraj A., Rossi F.H., Lurie F. et al. Diagnosis of chronic iliac venous obstruction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(4):101744. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101744
  18. Gagne P.J., Tahara R.W., Fastabend C.P. et al. Venography versus intravascular ul-trasound for diagnosing and treating iliofemoral vein obstruction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5(5):678–687. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.04.007
  19. Meissner M.H., Khilnani N.M., Labropoulos N. et al. The Symptoms-Varices-Pathophysiology classification of pelvic venous disorders: A report of the American Vein & Lymphatic Society International Working Group on Pelvic Venous Disorders. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(3):568‒584. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.084
  20. Khilnani N.M. , Meissner M.H., Learman L.A. et al. Research Priorities in Pelvic Ve-nous Disorders in Women: Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Research Con-sensus Panel. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2019;30(6):781‒789. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.10.008
  21. Basile A., Castiglione D. The Symptoms-Varices-Pathophysiology (SVP) Classification of Pelvic Venous Disorders: A New Tool to Assess the Complex Scenario of Chronic Venous Diseases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;44(8):1298‒1299. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02868-4
  22. Clark M.R., Taylor A.C. Pelvic Venous Disorders: An Update in Terminology, Diag-nosis, and Treatment. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2023;40(4):362‒371. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771041
  23. Kirienko A.I., Gavrilov S.G., Karalkin A.V. et al. Diagnosis of varicose veins of the pelvis. Annaly khirurgii = Annals of surgery. 2003;(4):51‒57. (In Russ.)
  24. Gavrilov S.G. Varicose veins of the pelvis: when and how to treat? Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2007;1(1):48‒54. (In Russ.)
  25. Dieleman F., Hamming J.F., Erben Y. et al. Nutcracker Syndrome: Challenges in Di-agnosis and Surgical Treatment. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2023;94:178‒185. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.03.030
  26. Erben Y., Gloviczki P., Kalra M. et al. Treatment of nutcracker syndrome with open and endovascular interventions. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015;3(4):389‒396. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.04.003
  27. Neymark A.I., Shelkovnikova N.V. Endovascular treatment of persistent dysuria and chronic pelvic pain in varicose veins of the pelvis in women. Urologiya = Urology. 2012;(4):20–24. (In Russ.)
  28. Said S.M., Gloviczki P., Kalra M. et al. Renal nutcracker syndrome: surgical options. Semin Vasc Surg. 2013;26(1):35‒42. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2013.04.006
  29. Velasquez C.A., Saeyeldin A., Zafar M.A. et al. A systematic review on management of nutcracker syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(2):271‒278. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.11.005
  30. Gavrilov S.G., Karalkin A.V., Mishakina N.Y. et al. Effect of left renal vein com-pression stenosis on functional status of left kidney in patients with pelvic venous dis-orders. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(1):101668. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.009
  31. Gavrilov S.G., Chepurov A.K., Yanina A.M. Aorto-mesenteric compression of the left renal vein as a factor in the development of pelvic varicose veins. Annaly khirurgii = Annals of surgery. 2011;(5):18‒23. (In Russ.)
  32. Ananthan K., Onida S., Davies A.H. Nutcracker Syndrome: An Update on Current Diagnostic Criteria and Management Guidelines. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(6):886‒894. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.015
  33. Debucquois A., Salomon du Mont L., Bertho W. et al. Current results of left gonadal vein transposition to treat nutcracker syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(6):1504‒1509. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.03.003
  34. Sukovatykh B.S., Sukovatykh M.B. Pathogenetic rationale for mini-invasive treatment of varicose veins of the pelvis. Novosti khirurgii = News of surgery. 2012;20(1):54‒61. (In Russ.)
  35. Gavrilov S.G., Zolotukhin I.A., Moskalenko E.P. et al. Sclerotherapy of vulvar veins – an alternative to phlebectomy in the perineum? Annaly khirurgii = Annals of surgery. 2015;(5):35‒40. (In Russ.)
  36. Gavrilov S.G., Zolotukhin I.A., Moskalenko E.P. et al. Phlebosclerosing treatment of vulvar varicose veins. Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2016;10(1):50‒53. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/flebo201610150-53
  37. Gavrilov S.G. Vulvar varicosities: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:463‒475. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s126165
  38. Gavrilov S.G., Temirbolatov M.D. Varicose veins of the pelvis as a cause of vulvar varicose veins and varicose veins of the lower extremities. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. akademika A.V. Pokrovskogo = Angiology and vascular sur-gery. Journal named after academician A.V. Pokrovskiy. 2017;23(4):171‒180. (In Russ.)
  39. Gavrilov S.G., Mozharovskiy K.V., Savinkova K.Yu. Pelvio-perineal reflux: causes, diagnostic and treatment methods. Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2018;12(2):82‒90. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/flebo201812282-88
  40. Tsouknidas I., Charisis N., Eklof B. et al. Venous Claudication: a Scoping Review of the Pathophysiology and Clinical Importance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;64(5):535‒543. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.08.006
  41. Smith S.J., Smith B.H., Sichlau M.J. et al. Nonpelvic comorbid symptoms of 45 pa-tients with pain of pelvic venous origin, before and after treatment. Phlebology. 2024;39(10):581‒590. doi: 10.1177/02683555241273109
  42. Scholbach T. From the nutcracker-phenomenon of the left renal vein to the midline congestion syndrome as a cause of migraine, headache, back and abdominal pain and functional disorders of pelvic organs. Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(6):1318‒1327. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.10.040
  43. Stones R.W., Thomas D.C., Beard R.W. Suprasensitivity to calcitonin gene-related peptide but not vasoactive intestinal peptide in women with chronic pelvic pain. Clin Auton Res. 1992;2(5):343‒348. doi: 10.1007/BF01824305
  44. Gavrilov S.G., Karalkin A.V., Mishakina N.Y. et al. Hemodynamic and neurobiolog-ical factors for the development of chronic pelvic pain in patients with pelvic venous disorder. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023;11(3):610‒618. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.01.006
  45. Mistry H., Naghdi S., Brown A. et al. Preventive drug treatments for adults with chronic migraine: a systematic review with economic modelling. Health Technol As-sess. 2024;28(63):1‒329. doi: 10.3310/aywa5297
  46. Calcagno T., Sulakvelidze L., Kennedy R. et al. Transabdominal ultrasound accu-rately identifies a significant iliac vein area-reducing lesion in patients with pelvic ve-nous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023;11(6):1213‒1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.06.011
  47. Whiteley M.S., Dos Santos S.J., Harrison C.C. et al. Transvaginal duplex ultrasonog-raphy appears to be the gold standard investigation for the haemodynamic evaluation of pelvic venous reflux in the ovarian and internal iliac veins in women. Phlebology. 2015;30(10):706‒713.
  48. Gavrilov S., Moskalenko Y.P., Mishakina N.Y. et al. Stratification of pelvic venous reflux in patients with pelvic varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(6):1417‒1424.
  49. Volkov A.E., Rymashevskiy N.V., Mikhel'son A.F. et al. The place of ultrasound in the diagnosis of the causes of pelvic pain syndrome. Ul'trazvukovaya diagnostika v akusherstve, ginekologii i pediatrii = Ultrasound diagnostics in obstetrics, gynecology and pediatrics. 2000;8(1):62‒66. (In Russ.)
  50. Szary C., Wilczko J., Zawadzki M., Grzela T. Hemodynamic and Radiological Classi-fication of Ovarian Veins System Insufficiency. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):646. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040646
  51. Fomina E.E., Nasrullaev M.N., Nasrullaeva A.A. Ultrasound diagnostics of varicose veins of the pelvis in women with primary valve insufficiency. Acta medica Eurasica. 2022;(3):54‒62. (In Russ.). Available at: https://acta-medica-eurasica.ru/en/single/2022/3/7/ doi: 10.47026/2413-4864-2022-3-54-62
  52. Gavrilov S.G., Moskalenko E.P., Kulikov V.M. et al. Protocol of ultrasound examina-tion of pelvic veins in women. Angiology and vascular surgery. Zhurnal imeni akad-emika A.V. Pokrovskogo = Journal named after academician A.V. Pokrovskiy. 2024;30(3):34‒46. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33029/1027-6661-2024-30-3-34-46
  53. Dos Santos S.J., Holdstock J.M., Harrison C.C. et al. Ovarian Vein Diameter Cannot Be Used as an Indicator of Ovarian Venous Reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(1):90‒94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.10.013
  54. Whiteley M.S. Objective measurements of pelvic venous reflux and stratification of severity of venous reflux in pelvic congestion syndrome due to pelvic venous reflux. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(11):2089‒2091. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1332987
  55. Gavrilov S.G., Moskalenko E.P., Karalkin A.V. et al. Is pelvic vein diameter a predictor of pelvic venous congestion? Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2017;11(1):28‒31. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/flebo201711128-31
  56. Grishenkova A.S., Moskalenko E.P., Mishakina N.Yu. et al. Relationship between pelvic pain and pelvic variceal reflux in patients with pelvic venous congestion syn-drome. Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2021;15(4):251‒258. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/flebo202115041251
  57. Labropoulos N., Borge M., Pierce K. et al. Criteria for defining significant central vein stenosis with duplex ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(1):101‒107. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.062
  58. Kolber M.K., Cui Z., Chen C.K. et al. Nutcracker syndrome: diagnosis and therapy. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021;11(5):1140‒1149. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-160
  59. Granata A., Distefano G., Sturiale A. et al. From Nutcracker Phenomenon to Nut-cracker Syndrome: A Pictorial Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(1):101. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010101
  60. Farina R., Foti P.V., Conti A. et al. The role of ultrasound imaging in vascular com-pression syndromes. J Ultrasound. 2021;13(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00202-6
  61. Farina R., Foti P.V., Iannace F.A. et al. May Thurner syndrome: description of a case with unusual clinical onset. J Ultrasound. 2022;25(2):309‒313. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00497-0
  62. Assi I.Z., Lynch S.R., Samulak K. et al. An ultrasound imaging and computational fluid dynamics protocol to assess hemodynamics in iliac vein compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023;11(5):1023‒1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.05.017
  63. Metzger P.B., Rossi F.H., Kambara A.M. et al. Criteria for detecting significant chronic iliac venous obstructions with duplex ultrasound. J Vasc Surg Venous Lym-phat Disord. 2016;4(1):18‒27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.07.002
  64. Daugherty S.F., Gillespie D.L. Venous angioplasty and stenting improve pelvic conges-tion syndrome caused by venous outflow obstruction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015;3(3):283‒289. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.01.003
  65. Gavrilov S.G., Lebedev I.S., Vasilyev A.V. et al. Prospective Cohort Study of a Treatment Strategy for a Combination of the Left Common Iliac Vein Compression Stenosis and Pelvic Venous Insufficiency. J Endovasc Ther. 2024;31(6):127‒135. doi: 10.1177/15266028241271736
  66. Arnoldussen C.W., de Wolf M.A., Wittens C.H. Diagnostic imaging of pelvic conges-tive syndrome. Phlebology. 2015;30(suppl.1.):67‒72. doi: 10.1177/0268355514568063
  67. Umeoka S., Koyama T., Togashi K. et al. Vascular dilatation in the pelvis: identifica-tion with CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2004;24:193–208. doi: 10.1148/rg.241035061
  68. Kim C.Y., Miller M.J.Jr., Merkle E.M. Time-resolved MR angiography as a useful sequence for assessment of ovarian vein reflux. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:458–463. doi: 10.2214/ajr.09.2557
  69. Dick E.A., Burnett C., Anstee A. et al. Time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance venography in patients with pelvic congestion syndrome. Br J Radiol. 2010;83(994):882–887. doi: 10.1259/bjr/82417499
  70. Huang Y.K., Hsu Y.C., Tseng Y.H. et al. Quantitative two-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging characterization of lower extremity venous disease: venous reflux versus venous obstruction. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13(8):5153‒5167. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1194
  71. Silickas J., Black S.A., Phinikaridou A. et al. Use of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Central Venous Disease. Methodist Debakey Cardi-ovasc. J. 2018;14(3):188–195. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-14-3-188
  72. Liu P., Peng J., Zheng L. et al. Application of computed tomography venography in the diagnosis and severity assessment of iliac vein compression syndrome: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e12002. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000012002
  73. Hamabe A., Harino T., Ogino T. et al. Analysis of anatomical variations of intrapel-vic vessels for advanced pelvic surgery. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00711-0
  74. Shahat M., Abdelbaqy O.M.A., AbdelHakam A.M. et al. Can cross-sectional imaging replace diagnostic venography in pelvic venous disorder (PeVD)? J Vasc Surg Ve-nous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(2):101724. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101724
  75. Aurshina A., Huber S., Deng Y. et al. Correlation of venous symptoms with iliac vein stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(5):1291‒1296. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.077
  76. Raju S., Walker W., Noel C. et al. The two-segment caliber method of diagnosing iliac vein stenosis on routine computed tomography with contrast enhancement. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020;8(6):970‒977. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.02.021
  77. Saleem T., Raju S. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and multidimensional con-trast imaging modalities for characterization of chronic occlusive iliofemoral venous disease: A systematic review. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(6):1545‒1556. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.03.022
  78. How G.Y., Quek L.H.H., Huang I.K.H. et al. Intravascular ultrasound correlation of unenhanced magnetic resonance venography in the context of pelvic deep venous dis-ease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022;10(5):1087‒1094. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.04.008
  79. Movchan E.A., Manakova Ya.L., Galkina E.A. et al. Nutcracker syndrome in nephro-logical practice. Klinicheskaya nefrologiya = Clinical nephrology. 2019;(2):44‒48. (In Russ.)
  80. Sukhova M.B., Trofimova T.N., Abolenskaya M.V. et al. Multispiral computed to-mography of arteriovenous obstructions of the upper level (abdominal cavity and ret-roperitoneal space). Luchevaya diagnostika i terapiya = Radiation diagnostics and therapy. 2022;13(1):51–57. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2022-13-1-51-57
  81. Gulleroglu K., Gulleroglu B., Baskin E. Nutcracker syndrome. World J Nephrol. 2014;3:277‒281. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.277
  82. Hangge P.T., Gupta N., Khurana A. et al. Degree of Left Renal Vein Compression Predicts Nutcracker Syndrome. J Clin Med. 2018;7(5):107. doi: 10.3390/jcm7050107
  83. Góes A.M.O., Araújo R.S., Furlaneto I.P. et al. Compression of left renal vein and left common iliac vein on CT scans: how often are they detected? J Vasc Bras. 2020;19:e20190121. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.190121
  84. Nastasi D.R., Fraser A.R., Williams A.B. et al. A systematic review on nutcracker syndrome and proposed diagnostic algorithm. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022;10(6):1410‒1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.08.003
  85. Meram E., Swietlik J., Philip J. et al. Correlation of Imaging and Hemodynamic Find-ings with Clinical Outcomes for Diagnosis of Left Renal Vein Compression Syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024;47(9):1190‒1199. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03822-w
  86. Gavrilov S.G., Vasilyev A.V., Moskalenko Y.P. et al. Diagnostic value of pelvic ve-nography in female patients with pelvic varicose veins and vulvar varicosities. Int An-giol. 2020;39(6):452‒460. doi: 10.23736/s0392-9590.20.04402-8
  87. Hartung O., Grisoli D., Boufi M. et al. Endovascular stenting in the treatment of pelvic vein congestion caused by nutcracker syndrome: lessons learned from the first five cases. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(2):275‒280. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.03.052
  88. Reed N.R., Kalra M., Bower T.C. et al. Left renal vein transposition for nutcracker syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(2):386‒393. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.051
  89. Dewald C.L.A., Becker L.S., Meyer B.C. Interventional Therapy of Pelvic Venous Disorders (PeVD). Rofo. 2024;196(9):921‒927. doi: 10.1055/a-2229-4100
  90. Robertson B., Shapiro J., Muck A. et al. Venous stent patency is independent of total stented length in nonthrombotic iliac vein and post-thrombotic venous stenosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023;11(2):339‒345. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.07.006
  91. Gagne P.J., Gasparis A., Black S. et al. Analysis of threshold stenosis by multiplanar venogram and intravascular ultrasound examination for predicting clinical improve-ment after iliofemoral vein stenting in the VIDIO trial. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(1):48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.07.009
  92. Brinegar K.N., Sheth R.A., Khademhosseini A. et al. Iliac vein compression syn-drome: Clinical, imaging and pathologic findings. World J Radiol. 2015;7:375–81. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i11.375
  93. Wittens C.H.A. Invited Commentary. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5(5):687‒688. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.04.008
  94. Jayaraj A., Buck W., Knight A. et al. Impact of degree of stenosis in May-Thurner syndrome on iliac vein stenting. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(2):195‒2024.
  95. Jayaraj A., Powell T., Raju S. Utility of the 50% stenosis criterion for patients undergo-ing stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(6):1408‒1415. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.05.008
  96. Butts H., Jayaraj A. Impact of native iliac vein aspect ratio on initial clinical presenta-tion and outcomes following stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous ob-struction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(5):101900. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101900
  97. Oguzkurt L., Ozkan U., Ulusan S. et al. Compression of the left common iliac vein in asymptomatic subjects and patients with left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(3):366‒370. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.09.007
  98. Carr S., Chan K., Rosenberg J. et al. Correlation of the diameter of the left common iliac vein with the risk of lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Ra-diol. 2012;23(11):1467‒1472. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.07.030
  99. Kibbe M.R., Ujiki M., Goodwin A.L. et al. Iliac vein compression in an asymptomat-ic patient population. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:937–943. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.032
  100. Cheng L., Zhao H., Zhang F.X. Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome in an Asympto-matic Patient Population: A Prospective Study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(11):1269‒1275. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.206341
  101. Vuuren T.M.A.J. van, Kurstjens R.L.M., Wittens C.H.A. et al. Illusory Angio-graphic Signs of Significant Iliac Vein Compression in Healthy Volunteers. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(6):874‒879. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.022
  102. Santoshi R.K.N., Lakhanpal S., Satwah V. et al. Iliac vein stenosis is an underdiag-nosed cause of pelvic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6:202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.007
  103. Gavrilov S.G., Vasilyev A.V., Krasavin G.V. et al. Endovascular interventions in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome caused by May-Thurner syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020;8:1049–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.02.012
  104. Lakhanpal G., Kennedy R., Lakhanpal S. et al. Pelvic venous insufficiency second-ary to iliac vein stenosis and ovarian vein reflux treated with iliac vein stenting alone. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9:1193–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.03.006
  105. Butros S.R., Liu R., Oliveira G.R. et al. Venous compression syndromes: clinical features, imaging findings and management. Br J Radiol. 2013;86(1030):20130284. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130284
  106. Ahmed H.K., Hagspiel K.D. Intravascular ultrasonographic findings in May-Thurner syndrome (iliac vein compression syndrome). J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20(3):251–256. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.3.251
  107. Gloviczki P., Lawrence P.F. Iliac vein stenting and contralateral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5:5‒6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.11.002

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».