Negative Effects of Knee Replacement


Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

Introduction Total knee arthroplasty is the treatment of choice in orthopedic practice for patients with late –stage knee osteoarthritis. However, arthroplasty has not only benefit results and the service life of the endoprothesis is limited. The use of modern conservative therapy and joint-preserving surgions allowed to delay or to avoid knee arthroplasty.

Purpose. The study purpose is the analysis of publications with negative results of knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Materials and methods.  The electronic Pub-Med/MEDLINE and eLibrary databases were searched for reviews published between 2002 and 2022.  A keyword search was also done using the terms: knee joint osteoarthritis, total knee replacement/arthroplasty, complications, patient satisfaction, indications/contraindications for surgery; related definitions and descriptions were extracted.

Results. The negative consequences of total knee arthroplasty are heterogeneous. Complications can be local and systemic such as surgical site infection, periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening (aseptic instability) of the endoprosthesis and its wear and the implant failure. The researcher’s data indicate increasing the number of patients who are not satisfied with the results of arthroplasty both in the short term and in the long-term after the operation, due to the natural wear of the prosthesis. Patients are not satisfied with the results of the operation 8% -30%. In recent years, there have been more publications devoted to the limitation of indication for arthroplasty in pftients with knee osteoarthritis. The replacement of the knee joint with an implant was done unreasonably in great number of cases.A number of patients after total knee arthroplasty require revision surgery within the first 5 years. Currently, the risk of failure of knee arthroplasty with the revision surgery in 10 years after primary arthroplasty is 5-6.8%. The main reasons for revision surgery after primary knee arthroplasty are periprosthetic infection and instability of the implant components, while the results of revision surgery are worse than   the primary arthroplasty.

Sobre autores

Jalolidin Mansurov

Samarkand State Medical University

Email: jalolmedic511@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1799-641X

Professor, Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and MFS

Uzbequistão, Uzbekistan, Samarkand, st. Amira Timura, 18

Aleksandr Tkachenko

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: altkachenko@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4585-5160

MD, PhD, D.Sc., Professor of the Department of Traumotology and Orthopedic, Military Field Surgery

Rússia, 195067, Piskarevsky pr., 47, St. Petersburg

Sergey Saiganov

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: rectorat@szgmu.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8325-1937
Código SPIN: 2174-6400

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Rússia, 195067, Piskarevsky pr., 47, St. Petersburg

Valerii Khaidarov

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: drxaydarov@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0754-4348

MD, PhD, Assistant of the De-partment of Traumotology and Orthopedic, Military Field Surgery.

Rússia, 195067, Piskarevsky pr., 47, St. Petersburg

Irina Urazovskaya

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: langelova@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4165-4599

Phd., teacher of the department of hospital surgery and cardiology

Rússia, 195067, Piskarevsky pr., 47, St. Petersburg

Yaroslav Tsololo

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: yaroslav.tsololo@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7744-0002

Graduate student

Rússia, Piskarevsky pr., 47, St. Petersburg, 195067

Aleksei Baranovskii

City policlinic №51

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: dr.baranovsky@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1985-5343

Orthopedic traumatologist

Rússia, 191023, St. Petersburg, Malaya Sadovaya st., 1

Bibliografia

  1. Sebbag E, Felten R, Sagez F, Sibilia J, Devilliers H, Arnaud L. The world-wide burden of musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic analysis of the World Health Organization Burden of Diseases Database. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2019; 78(6): 844–848. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215142.
  2. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014; 73 (7): 1323-1330. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763.
  3. Palazzo C, Ravaud J-F, Papelard A, Ravaud P, Poiraudeau S. The Burden of Musculoskeletal Conditions. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3): 90633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090633.
  4. Mazurov VI, Saiganov SA, Tkachenko AN, Inamova OV, Urazovskaya IL, Mansurov DSh, et al. Prevalence of osteoarthritis and problems of its statistical accounting. Zdorov'ye – osnova chelovecheskogo potentsiala: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. 2021; 16(2): 764-770. (in Russ.)
  5. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2010; 468(1): 57. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.
  6. Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2010; 92(9): 1253-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394.
  7. Canovas F, Dagneaux L. Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2018; 104(1S): 41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.017.
  8. Fedonnikov AS, Andriyanova EA, Yerugina MV, Norkin IA. Rehabilitation of patients after hip and knee arthroplasty: individual results of medical and sociological monitoring. Saratovskiy nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2017; 13(4): 796-799. (in Russ.)
  9. Parratte S, Kornilov NN, Tienpont E, Baldini A, Tikhilov RM, Argenson J-N, Kulyaba TA. Unexplained pain after total knee replacement. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2013; 4: 92-96. (in Russ.). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2013--4-92-96.
  10. Ali A, Sundberg M, Robertsson O, Dahlberg LE, Kristiansson CA, Redlund-Johnell I, et al. Dissatisfied patients after total knee arthroplasty: a registry study involving 114 patients with 8-13 years of followup. Acta arthopaedica. 2014; 85(3): 229-33. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.916487.
  11. Parvizi J, Nunley RM, Berend KR, Lombardi Jr AV, Ruh EL, Clohisy JC, et al. High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2014; 472(1): 133-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3229-7.
  12. Altukhova AV. Functional symptoms in the long term after total knee arthroplasty. Klinicheskaya praktika. 2021; 12(1): 16-24. (in Russ.). doi: 10.17816/clinpract60043.
  13. Dowsey MM, Spelman T, Choong RFM. Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of Nonresponse to Total Knee Arthroplasty 1 Year After Surgery. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(8): 1654-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.003.
  14. Healy WL, Della Valle CJ, Iorio R, Berend KR, Cushner FD, Dalury DF, et al. Complications of total knee arthroplasty: standardized list and definitions of the Knee Society. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2013; 471(1): 215-220. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2489-y.
  15. Gromov K. Complications and readmissions following outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective 2-center study with matched controls. Acta orthopaedica. 2019; 90(3): 281-285. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1577049.
  16. Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Böhler N, Labek G. Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013; 28: 1329-1332. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.012.
  17. Sereda AP, Kochish AA, Cherny AA, Antipov AP, Aliev AG, Weber EV, et al. Epidemiology of hip and knee arthroplasty and periprosthetic infection in the Russian Federation. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2021; 27(3): 84-93. (in Russ.). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-3-84-93.
  18. Blanco JF, Díaz A, Melchor FR, da Casa C, Pescador D. Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020; 140(2): 239-245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03304-6.
  19. Kopenkin SS. Prevention of venous thromboembolic complications in orthopedic surgery: new opportunities. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im. N.N. Priorova. 2010; 1: 35-39. (in Russ.) (in Russ.) doi: 10.17816/vto201017135-38.
  20. Moiseev SV. Adherence to anticoagulant therapy: problems and solutions. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya. 2014; 23(4): 23-28. (in Russ.)
  21. Palshin GA, Pavlov SS, Markovchina MYu, Komissarov AN, Markov PV, Vinokurov MM, et al. The frequency of thromboembolic complications depending on compliance and type of prophylaxis in arthroplasty of large joints. Tikhookeanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2020; 1: 46-48. (in Russ.) doi: 10.34215/1609-1175-2020-1-46-48.
  22. Lombardo, DJ, Siljander MP, Sobh A, Moore DD, Karadsheh MS. Periprosthetic fractures about total knee arthroplasty. Musculoskeletal Surgery. 2020; 104(2): 135-143. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00628-9.
  23. Bordoni V, Poggi A, Zaffagnini S, Previtali D, Filardo G, Candrian C. Outpatient total knee arthroplasty leads to a higher number of complications: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1): 408. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01925-x.
  24. Maheshwari AV, Tsailas PG, Ranawat AS, Ranawa CS. How to address the patella in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2009; 16(2): 92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.08.003.
  25. Fu Y, Wang G, Fu Q. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2011; 19(9): 1460-1466. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1365-0.
  26. Jujo Y, Yasui T, Nagase Y, Kadono Y, Oka H, Tanaka S. Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(1): 40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.022.
  27. Bourke MG, Sclavos EK, Jull GA, Buttrum PJ, Dalton PA, Russell TG. A comparison of patellar vascularity between the medial parapatellar and subvastus approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6): 1123-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.013.
  28. Cheuy VA, Foran JRH, Paxton RJ, Bade MJ, Zeni JA, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Arthrofibrosis Associated With Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017; 32(8): 2604-2611. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.005.
  29. Encinas-Ullán CA, Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Arthroscopic treatment of total knee arthroplasty complications. EFORT Open Reviews. 2019; 4(2): 33-43. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180035.
  30. Khan M, Osman K, Green G, Haddad FS. The epidemiology of failure in total knee arthroplasty: avoiding your next revision. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(1 Suppl A): 105-112. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36293.
  31. Ivantsov VA, Lashkovsky VV, Bogdanovich IP, Anosov VS, Todrik AT, Balabanovich MYu. Clinical monitoring of revision arthroplasty of the hip and knee joints. Meditsinskiye novosti. 2020; 10(313): 23-26. (in Russ.)
  32. Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years? Journal of Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 1774-1778.
  33. Preobrazhensky PM, Kazemirsky AV, Goncharov MYu. Modern views on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with periprosthetic infection after knee arthroplasty. Geniy ortopedii. 2016; 3: 94-104. (in Russ.) doi: 10.17513/spno.27865.
  34. Haughton DN, Wheelton AN, McLauchlan GJ. Revision knee arthroplasty: Can good outcomes be achieved at lower volumes? Knee. 2021; 30: 63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.03.012.
  35. Rutherford RW, Jennings JM, Levy DL, Parisi TJ, Martin JR, Dennis DA. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Arthrofibrosis. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(7S): 177-181. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.037.
  36. Kulyaba TA. Revision arthroplasty of the knee joint. Dis. dr. med. nauk. SPb. 2012; 318. (in Russ.)
  37. Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury Jr TL. Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(6S): 79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030.
  38. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002; 404: 7-13. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003.
  39. Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S, Callaghan JJ, Saleh KJ. Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006; 446: 45-50. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214421.21712.62.
  40. Sheng P, Lehto M, Kataja M, Halonen P, Moilanen T, Pajamäki J. Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics. 2004; 28: 78-81. doi: 10.1007/s00264-003-0526-x.
  41. Murray DW, Parkinson RW. Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone and Joint Journal. 2018; 100-B(4): 432-435. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0716.R1.
  42. Jennings JM, Kleeman-Forsthuber LT, Bolognes MP. Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty of the Knee. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2019; 27(5): 166-176. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00690.
  43. Walter N, Weber J, Kerschbaum M, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Alt V, et al. Revision arthroplasty after unicompartimental knee arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2021; 16(1): 666. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02767-x.
  44. Burger JA, Zuiderbaan HA, Sierevelt IN, van Steenbergen L, Nolte PA, Pearle AD, et al. Risk of revision for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty according to fixation and bearing type: short- to mid-term results from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Bone and Joint Journal. 2021; 103-B (7): 1261-1269. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-1224.R3.
  45. Logvinov AN, Khoroshkov SN, Yarygin NV. Analysis of the results of partial knee arthroplasty according to 18-year data from the Australian registry AOANJRR. Kafedra travmatologii i ortopedii. 2021; 3 (45): 42-50. (in Russ.) doi: 10.17238/issn2226-2016.2021.2.43-51.
  46. Horne G, Devane P, Adams K, Stanley J. Does cruciate sacrifice increase revision rates in total knee arthroplasty? Orthopaedic Proceedings. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2011; 93(SUPP_III): 374-374.
  47. Delanois RE, Mistry JB, Gwam CU, Mohamed NS, Choksi US, Mont MA. Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017; 32(9): 2663-2668. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.066.
  48. Cherian JJ, Bhave A, Harwin SF, Mont MA. Outcomes and Aseptic Survivorship of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.). 2016; 45(2): 79-85.
  49. Leonova SN, Kameka AL, Grischuk AN. The results of revision arthroplasty of large joints with periprosthetic infection. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2019; 4(6): 108-111. (in Russ.) doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019-4.6.16.
  50. Cooney WP 4th, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW. Revision total knees done for extensor problems frequently require reoperation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2005; 440: 117-121. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000187527.28686.2d.
  51. Vecchini E, Berti M, Micheloni GM, Maluta T, Magnan B, Ricci M. Clinical and radiological results of a stemmed medial pivot revision implant in aseptic total knee revision arthroplasty. Knee. 2020; 27(4): 1190-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.05.018.
  52. Oliver G, Jaldin L, Camprubí E, Corté G. Observational Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Aseptic Revision Surgery: Clinical Results. Orthopaedic Surgery. 2020; 12(1): 177-183. doi: 10.1111/os.12593.
  53. Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Divano S, Felli L, Formica M. Metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty revision: complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2018; 138(7): 993-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2967-0.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição–NãoComercial–SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».