Intranasal Anesthesia of the Wounded at the Prehospital Stage Using Ketamine and Dexamethasone
- 作者: Slepushkin V.D.1, Kolesnikov A.N.2, Polyakhova Y.N.3
-
隶属关系:
- North Ossetian State Medical Academy of Health of the Russian Federation
- Donetsk State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Children's Clinical Center
- 期: 编号 1 (2024)
- 页面: 49-52
- 栏目: Clinical Aspects of Disaster Medicine
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2070-1004/article/view/357941
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33266/2070-1004-2024-1-49-52
- ID: 357941
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Summary. The purpose of the study is to compare different types of pain relief for wounded patients with traumatic shock in the prehospital period of medical care.
Materials and methods of research. The study included 168 patients, 101 of them with mine-fragmentation injuries of the lower extremities; 67 – with multiple fractures of the lower extremities received in road traffic accidents (RTA). The majority of those examined (131 patients – 78%) were men. The study included people of working age – from 19 to 59 years. All patients were diagnosed with stage II–III shock. gravity. The study did not include patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) or patients whose level of consciousness was below 12 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale. Primary health care for the subjects was provided by medical and paramedic teams of emergency medical services (EMS) or the Disaster Medicine Service (EMS). Comparative studies were conducted in two groups of patients.
Statistical processing of the obtained data was performed using the standard software package for applied statistical analysis StatPlus 2009 Professional using Student’s t test.
Research results and their analysis. In the prehospital period of medical care as part of intensive care, 98 wounded (group 1) were injected intramuscularly with 1 ml of a 2% solution of promedol for pain relief; 70 wounded (group 2) were administered intranasally 100 mg of ketamine and 4 mg of dexamethasone. The results of the study showed that in patients of the 2nd group the analgesic effect was recorded after 5–7 minutes, in patients of the 1st group – 30–45 minutes after administration. The intensity of pain according to the visual analogue scale in patients of group 2 was two times lower than in patients of group 1.
作者简介
V. Slepushkin
North Ossetian State Medical Academy of Health of the Russian Federation
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: slevit@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Department Vladikavkaz
A. Kolesnikov
Donetsk State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: slevit@mail.ru
Donetsk
Yu. Polyakhova
Children's Clinical Center
Email: slevit@mail.ru
Makeevka
参考
- Ильин Л.А., Иванов А.А., Кочетков О.А. , Семенов В.Г., Соловьев В.Ю. и др Техногенное облучение и безопасность человека / Под ред. Ильина Л.А. М.: ИздАТ, 2006. 303 с.
- Руководство по оценке риска для здоровья населения при воздействии химических веществ, загрязняющих окружающую среду Р 2.1.10.1920-04 / Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека. М., 2004.
- Демин В.Ф. Научно-методические аспекты оценки риска // Атомная энергия. 1999. Т.86. Вып.1. С. 46–63.
- Демин В.Ф., Романов В.В., Соловьев В.Ю. Гармонизированный подход к регулированию безопасности в разных областях деятельности человека // Мед. радиол. и радиац. безопасность. 2012. Т.57. №5. С. 20–30.
- Демин В. Ф., Кураченко И.А., Соловьев В.Ю. Концепция гармонизации норм безопасности в разных областях деятельности человека // Анализ риска здоровью. 2013. №3. С. 18–26.
- Demin V. F., Romanov V.V., Soloviev V.Yu., Zakharchenko I.E. Harmonized Approach to the Health Safety Regulation in Different Areas of Human Activity // Med. Radiol. and Radiat. Safety. 2013. V.58. No.5. P. 26–34.
- Demin V.F. Common approach to comparison and standardization of health risk from different sources of harm. Int. J. Low Radiation. 2006. Vol. 2. No. 3/4. P.172-178.
- Демин В.Ф., Захарченко И.Е. Риск воздействия ионизирующего излучения и других вредных факторов на здоровье человека: методы оценки и практическое применение // Радиационная биология. Радиоэкология. 2012. Т.52. №1. С. 1-13.
- Соловьев В.Ю., Бушманов А.Ю., Семенов В.Г. , и др. Концепция выделения групп повышенного риска среди персонала атомной отрасли // Мед. радиология и радиац. безопасность. 2009. Т.54. №6. С. 16–23.
- Соловьев В.Ю. Концепция выделения групп повышенного риска среди персонала производств с опасными условиями труда // Анализ риска здоровью. 2013. №3. С. 27–33.
补充文件

