Cost-effectiveness analysis of labour protection measures
- Authors: Korol’ E.A.1, Degaev E.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
- Issue: Vol 19, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 67-76
- Section: Safety of Construction and Urban Economy
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1997-0935/article/view/254469
- ID: 254469
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. Construction remains one of the most dangerous economic activities. During construction, workers face various risks that can lead to injuries, including falls from a height, cuts from sharp objects, bruises from falling heavy objects, and others. Fatal injury rates increased by 6.3 % in relation to 2021. In terms of economic component, the construction industry lost 92,373 man-days. The purpose of the work is to analyze the effectiveness and sufficiency of costs aimed at labour protection from 2002 to 2022.Materials and methods. Cost-benefit analysis method is used to estimate the ratio between labour protection costs and the results obtained in reducing occupational injuries in the construction industry. The analysis takes into account the costs associated with implementing labour protection measures and compares them to the outcomes achieved in terms of reducing occupational injuries.Results. In 2022, 33,347,096.1 thousand rubles were spent on labour protection measures. Out of this amount, 59.5 % of all funds, or approximately 33,347,096.1 thousand rubles, were spent for the purchase of protective clothing, special footwear and other personal protective equipment. The remaining funds were directed towards the implementation of other labour protection measures. There has been an annual increase in expenditures on labour protection measures since 2002. However, the real growth of cost is lower, taking into account inflation. The highest inflation was observed in 2002, the lowest in 2017, in 2022 was 11.94 %. In absolute terms, the total inflation over 20 years increased by 185.3 %, while progressive inflation amounted to 407.3 %.Conclusions. The analysis of occupational injury data for the period from 2002 to 2022 did not reveal a trend towards a decrease in industrial accidents from 2020. Some employers do not allocate enough funds for labour protection measures, which leads to a decrease in the level of safety at workplaces. This is confirmed by Rostrud data, which show that in 27.6 % of cases, the cause of injuries is unsatisfactory organization of work. Insufficient financing of labour protection measures is confirmed by the results of inspections. So, technical inspectors in 2022 found more than 4,600 violations. According to these violations, about 1,500 submissions and prescriptions were drawn up. Thus, in 2022, technical inspectors in the whole country recorded more than 4,600 violations of labour protection and 22,500 unfulfilled obligations on the part of the management of enterprises.
About the authors
E. A. Korol’
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Email: KorolEA@mgsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5019-3694
E. N. Degaev
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Email: DegaevEN@mgsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6384-8277
References
- Пушенко С.Л., Гапонов В.Л., Кукареко В.А. Анализ производственного травматизма в строительной индустрии и пути его снижения // Безопасность техногенных и природных систем. 2022. № 2. С. 24–30. doi: 10.23947/2541-9129-2022-2-24-30. EDN IYBRVK.
- Магомедова Н.З. Анализ причин производственного травматизма // Образование и наука в России и за рубежом. 2020. № 6 (70). С. 50–52. EDN VNAURO.
- Saputri H. Legal protection of occupational safety and health for pharmacists of clinics in semarang // Awang Long Law Review. 2022. Vol. 5. Issue 1. Pp. 205–214. doi: 10.56301/awl.v5i1.565
- Чумачева Н.М. Динамика производственного травматизма в строительной отрасли // Труды Новосибирского государственного архитектурно-строительного университета (Сибстрин). 2017. Т. 20. № 1 (64). С. 70–79. EDN ZMIEIH.
- Король Е.А., Дегаев Е.Н. Динамика снижения производственного травматизма // Вестник МГСУ. 2023. Т. 18. № 3. С. 438–446. doi: 10.22227/1997-0935.2023.3.438-446. EDN YZSTAH.
- Дегаев Е.Н., Король Р.А., Плотников А.Д. Особенности снижения производственного травматизма в России и за рубежом // Строительство и архитектура. 2023. Т. 11. № 1. С. 25. doi: 10.29039/2308-0191-2022-11-1-25-25. EDN QOAODS.
- Лукьянченко Н.Д., Васильев А.С. Влияние охраны труда на эффективность использования трудового потенциала предприятия // Экономика строительства и городского хозяйства. 2021. Т. 17. № 3. С. 123–130. EDN ECIWXG.
- Olyanyshen T.V., Storozhuk V.М., Yatsiuk R.A., Korzh H.I., Ratushniak Yu.V., Melnikov A.V. Multicriteria problem of evaluation of the enterprise labor protection management system efficiency // Mathematical Modeling and Computing. 2021. Vol. 8. Issue 2. Pp. 330–337. doi: 10.23939/mmc2021.02.330
- Tawiah T., Opoku A., Frimpong A., Hafiz B. An assessment of knowledge among healthcare professionals on occupational health hazards at New Abirem government hospital, Ghana // Asian Journal of Medicine and Health. 2022. Pp. 153–171. doi: 10.9734/ajmah/2022/v20i1030516
- Yiu N.S.N., Chan D.W.M., Shan M., Sze N.N. Implementation of safety management system in managing construction projects: Benefits and obstacles // Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 117. Pp. 23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.027
- Jbeily A.H. Importance and effectiveness of different safety training methods and their application in iron ore pelletizing plants // European Journal of Business and Management Research. 2023. Vol. 8. Issue 1. Pp. 142–146. doi: 10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.1.1790
- Сенченко В.А., Каверзнева Т.Т., Пушенко С.Л., Стасева Е.В. Совершенствование методики оценки неснижаемого запаса средств индивидуальной защиты для снижения класса (подкласса) условий труда работников // Кадровик. 2023. № 6. С. 77–85. EDN JWMWDJ.
- Кузьмина О.В., Искакова А.К. Снижение уровня производственного травматизма в исследуемой организации // Молодой ученый. 2016. № 26 (130). С. 55–58. EDN XCHYDZ.
- Suparna N.S., Ajeet Jaiswal. The occupational health and safety // Anthropo-Indialogs. 2021. Vol. 1. Issue 3. Pp. 261–269.
- Стасева Е.В., Пушенко С.Л., Сенченко В.А. Новые подходы в организации обучения и проверки знаний требований безопасности и охраны труда // Кадровик. 2020. № 7. С. 107–112. EDN QQOJBO.
- Mohd Isa M.F., Ab. Rahim N.Z., Fathi M.S., Mohd Yusoff R.C. Extending the occupational safety and health management system as a knowledge management system through the mixed-reality remote audit // Knowledge Management in Organisations. 2022. Pp. 270–278. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-07920-7_21
- Сенченко В.А., Каверзнева Т.Т., Фетисов А.Г., Пушенко С.Л., Стасева Е.В. Оптимизация процесса планирования потребности в средствах индивидуальной защиты работающих на основе модели данных размерного ряда сотрудников // Кадровик. 2023. № 2. С. 92–99. EDN GSGAGG.
- Yılmaz S. How to enhance occupational health and safety practices in schools: An analysis through the eyes of school principals // International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies. 2022. Vol. 9. Pp. 922–933. doi: 10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.4.871
- Фомин А.И., Халявина М.Н., Осипова А.А. Исследование проблем производственного травматизма и профессиональной заболеваемости // Вестник Научного центра ВостНИИ по промышленной и экологической безопасности. 2017. № 4. С. 82–90. EDN ZXFNNF.
- Iskandar I., Ryadinency R., Santi S., Zamli Z. Supervisory relationship with the use of personal protective equipment on employees // International Journal Papier Public Review. 2023. Vol. 4. Issue 2. Pp. 52–55. doi: 10.47667/ijppr.v4i2.221
Supplementary files
