Thought experiment in the history of political and legal doctrines: Lon Fuller’s “The Case of the Speluncean Explorers”
- Authors: Tikhonova S.V.1, Samokhina E.G.2
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State University
- HSE University in St. Petersburg
- Issue: Vol 25, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 262-268
- Section: Lаw
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1994-2540/article/view/352289
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2025-25-3-262-268
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OSGEKN
- ID: 352289
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. In modern scientific research, the thought experiment remains relevant in both natural and social sciences. Its use in theoretical legal science is particularly significant, as it compensates for the impossibility of practical verification of hypotheses by real experiment. One of the most striking examples of the application of the thought experiment is Lon Fuller’s “The Case of the Speluncean Explorers”, published in 1949. In the experiment the author simulates a judicial process, imitating a conflict of different approaches to understanding and interpreting law. Theoretical analysis. As part of this thought experiment, Fuller examines the case of the forced murder of a man by a group of speleologists in an emergency situation. The arguments of the five fictional judges demonstrate different doctrinal approaches: formalism, legal process, natural law, legal realism, and an emotional-relativistic approach. This experiment not only raises the question of the nature of justice and moral responsibility, but also reflects the real contradictions in the legal concepts of the mid-20th century. By joining Fuller’s experiment, the reader is forced to solve them independently, which is how the heuristic nature of the methodological tool chosen by the thinker manifests itself. Еmpirical analysis. The authors show that the “The Case of the Speluncean Explorers” is actively used to discuss theoretical and ethical aspects of law. The positions of the judges were analyzed, their strengths and weaknesses were identified. Special attention is paid to the emotional factor that prevents the achievement of a unanimous decision. Results. Fuller’s thought experiment effectively reveals the drama of legal decision-making, stimulates deep reflection on the moral aspects of law, and demonstrates the importance of integrating different approaches for an adequate understanding of the essence of law and justice.
About the authors
Sophia Vladimirovna Tikhonova
Saratov State University
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2487-3925
410028, Russia, Saratov, Astrakhanskaya str., 83
Ekaterina G. Samokhina
HSE University in St. Petersburg16 Soyuza Pechatnikov St.
References
- Вархотов Т. А. От воображения к карте: недискурсивные основания мысленного эксперимента // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2021. № 62. С. 250–259. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/62/24
- Godfrey-Smith P. Metaphysics and the philosophical imagination // Philosophical Studies. 2012. Vol. 160. P. 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9913-8
- Fuller L. L. The case of the speluncean explorers // Harvard Law Review. 1949. Vol. 62, № 4. Р. 616–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/1336025
- Архипов В. В. Концепция права Лона Л. Фуллера // Российский ежегодник теории права. 2011. № 2–2009. С. 708–711. EDN: YPKMYJ
- Архипов В. В. Концепция права Лона Л. Фуллера : дис. … канд. юрид. наук. СПб., 2009. 164 с. 6.
- Козлихин И. Ю. Процессуальная концепция права Лона // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 1993. № 2. С. 53–58. EDN: TPOUJR
- Червонюк В. И. Идея структуры (анатомии) права в творчестве Лона Фуллера // Вестник Московского университета МВД России. 2024. № 4. С. 202–209. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2024-4-202-209, EDN: IJDZFR
- Перов В. Ю., Севастьянова А. Д. Проблема морального содержания права в концепциях Л. Фуллера и Г. Харта // Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. 2018. Вып. 3. C. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2018-3.17
- Оглезнев В. В. Переосмысление и новая интерпретация дискуссий между Г. Л. А. Хартом и Л. Л. Фуллером и их значение для аналитической философии права // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2010. № 330. С. 55–59.
- Дидикин А. Б. Современные теории естественного права и классическая традиция // Schole. 2014. Т. 8, № 2. С. 418–424.
- Cordoso B. N. What medicine can do for law // Cordoso B. N. Law and Literature and other essays and addresses. New York : Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1931. P. 70–120.
- Finkelstein C. O. Two men and a plank // Legal Theory. 2001. № 7. Р. 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325201073049
- D'Amato A. The Speluncean Explorers – Further Proceedings // Stanford Law Review. 1980. Vol. 32, № 3. Р. 467–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228393
- Eskridge Jr. W. N. The Case of Speluncean Explorers: The Twentieth Century Interpretation of the Law in a Nutshell // George Washington Law Review. 1993. Vol. 61, № 6. Р. 1731–1753.
- Suber P. The case of the speluncean explorers: Nine new opinions. New York : Routledge, 1998. 128 р.
- Shapiro D. L. The case of the speluncean explorers: A fiftieth anniversary symposium // Harvard Law Review. 1999. Vol. 112, № 8. Р. 1834–1924. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342396
- The Trolley Problem Mysteries / ed. by F. M. Kamm. New York : Oxford University Press, 2015. 270 p. 18. Fuller L. L. Consideration and Form // Columbia Law Review. 1941. Vol. 41, № 5. Р. 799–824. https://doi.org/10.2307/1117840
Supplementary files

