Proposals for improving a non-invasive method for estimating abundance of mouse-like rodents and shrews in urban areas
- Authors: Tolkachev O.V.1, Maklakov K.V.1, Maklakov K.V.1, Kuvaeva E.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of RAS
- Issue: Vol 24, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 51-57
- Section: Biology
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1816-9775/article/view/357153
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9775-2024-24-1-51-57
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CKTYLC
- ID: 357153
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Keywords
About the authors
Oleg V. Tolkachev
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of RAS
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5673-7816
Sverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg, st. 8 March, 202/3 district: Vtorcherme
Kirill V. Maklakov
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of RASSverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg, st. 8 March, 202/3 district: Vtorcherme
Kirill V. Maklakov
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of RAS
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1089-9104
Scopus Author ID: 6506724459
Sverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg, st. 8 March, 202/3 district: Vtorcherme
Ekaterina I. Kuvaeva
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of RASSverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg, st. 8 March, 202/3 district: Vtorcherme
References
- Sikes R. S., Gannon W. L. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research // Journal of Mammalogy. 2011. № 92. P. 235–253.
- Sikes R. S., Bryan II J. A., Gannon L., Odell K., Tracy A. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research // Journal of Mammalogy. 2016. Vol. 97, № 3. P. 663–688. https://doi. org/10.1093/jmammal/ gyw078
- Kalinin A. A. The consequences of small mammal censuses by method of irreversible removal // Russ. J. Ecol. 2019. Vol. 50, № 3. P. 262–267.
- Kalinin A. A., Aleksandrov D. Y., Kupriyanova I. F. Contributions of resident populations and nonresident activities of small mammals to the results of censuses performed using the permanent removal method // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2020. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 184–192.
- DeSa M. A., Zweig C. L., Franklin H. P., Kitchens W. M., Kasbohm J. W. Comparison of small-mammal sampling techniques in tidal salt marshes of the central gulf coast of Florida // Southeastern Naturalist. 2012. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 89–100. https://doi.org/10. 1656/058.011.0109
- Hamm K. A., Diller L. V., Kitchen D. W. Comparison of indices to estimate abundance of dusky-footed woodrats // Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2002. Vol. 30, № 1. P. 64–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3784636
- Aplin K. P., Brown P. R., Jacob J., Krebs C. J., Singleton G. R. Field methods for rodent studies in Asia and the Indo-Pacifi c. Canberra, ACIAR Monograph, 2003. № 100. 223 p.
- Карасева Е. В., Телицына А. Ю., Жигальский О. А. Методы изучения грызунов в полевых условиях. М. : Издательство ЛКИ, 2008. 416 с.
- Bean W. T., Stafford R., Prugh L. R., Butterfi eld H. S., Brashares J. S. An evaluation of monitoring methods for the endangered giant kangaroo rat // Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2012. Vol. 36, № 3. P. 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.171
- Blackwell G. L., Potter M. A., McLennan J. A. Rodent density indices from tracking tunnels, snap-traps and Fenn traps: Do they tell the same story? // New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 2002. Vol. 26, № 1. P. 43–51.
- Nams V. O., Gillis E. A. Changes in tracking tube use by small mammals over time // Journal of Mammalogy. 2003. Vol. 84, № 4. P. 1374–1380. https://doi.org/10. 1644/BEH-001
- De Bondi N., White J. G., Stevens M., Cooke R. A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities // Wildlife Research. 2010. № 37. P. 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1071/ WR10046
- Clarin B. M., Bitzilekis E., Siemers B. M., Goerlitz H. R. Personal messages reduce vandalism and theft of unattended scientifi c equipment // Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014. № 5. P. 125–131. https://doi. org/10.1111/2041-210X.12132
- Tolkachev O. V., Malkova E. A., Maklakov K. V. A Reconnaissance method for small mammal abundance assessment in urban environments // Russ. J. Ecol. 2021. № 52. P. 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106741362104010X
- Ердаков Л. Н., Николаев А. С., Фолитарек С. С. Активность и миграции // Водяная полевка: Образ вида. М. : Наука, 2001. С. 290–305.
- Фолитарек С. С., Максимов А. А. Сезонные кочевки, подвижность и активность водяной крысы // Водяная крыса и борьба с ней в западной Сибири. Новосибирск : Новосибирское кн. изд-во, 1959. 476 с.
- Öberg M. The use of tracking tunnels to monitor the activity of small mammals in habitats associated with the northern wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe). Master Thesis. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2009. 35 р.
- Gillies C. A., Williams D. DOC tracking tunnel guide v2.5.2: Using tracking tunnels to monitor rodents and mustelids. Hamilton, Department of Conservation, Science & Capability Group. 2013. 14 р.
- Ruffell J., Innes J., Didham R. K. Effi cacy of chew-trackcard indices of rat and possum abundance across widely varying pest densities // New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 2015. Vol. 39, № 1. P. 87–92.
- Cooper A., Kelly C. L., King C. M., Miller S. D., Patty B. Do rats mind getting their feet dirty? Observing the behaviour of ship rats (Rattus rattus) towards footprint tracking tunnels // New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 2017. Vol. 45, № 1. P. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03014223.2017.1361455
Supplementary files

