Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity of BMP-2 in the Coating of Dental Implants: an In Vitro Study
- Authors: Stepanov A.G.1, Apresyan S.V.1, Nacharyan E.G.1, Kopylov M.V.1, Kazarian G.G.1, Jumaniazova E.D.1, Karyagina V.Е.1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
- Issue: Vol 29, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 210-218
- Section: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1728-2802/article/view/313931
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent654080
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GACLGK
- ID: 313931
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) is increasingly incorporated into bone graft materials due to its positive effects on osseointegration and de novo bone formation. While its efficacy in bone regeneration is well established, concerns have been raised about adverse effects, including inflammation, ectopic bone formation, soft tissue swelling, and even oncogenesis. Understanding the basis of these effects requires investigation of BMP-2 impact on various cell types.
AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the biological effects of BMP-2–containing implant coatings on the human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1.
METHODS: THP-1 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 2 mL/well and a concentration of 250 × 103 cells per well, with PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate) added to a final concentration of 150 nM. The cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 4–6 h until fully adhered to the culture plastic. Experimental implants (one per well) were then added and incubated for 48 h. To detect apoptotic cells after 48-hour incubation with implants, they were stained with propidium iodide (Lumiprobe, Russia). For each sample, 1 × 105 cells were analyzed. Immunophenotyping was performed using anti-CD45 monoclonal antibodies (130-113-681, clone 5B; Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). Samples were analyzed using a NovoCyte Advanteon flow cytometer (Agilent, USA), and data were processed with Flowing Software 2.
RESULTS: No significant differences in cytostatic effects were observed between implants with and without BMP-2 coating. However, culture medium alone differed significantly from the implant-containing groups, suggesting that the mere presence of an implant affects THP-1 cell behavior. After incubation with the test implant samples, the percentage of apoptotic THP-1 cells, detected by flow cytometry following propidium iodide staining (PI test), did not significantly change between groups, despite a slight increase in this parameter among coated samples. Notably, a significantly higher proportion of CD45+ cells was detected after incubation with coated implants.
CONCLUSION: The study showed that implants with and without coating do not differ in their cytostatic properties when incubated with THP-1 cells. When assessing the percentage of apoptotic THP-1 cells, no significant difference was observed between groups of implants with and without coating. However, the group of coated implants exhibited a significantly higher percentage of CD45+ cells.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Alexander G. Stepanov
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Email: stepanovmd@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6543-0998
SPIN-code: 5848-6077
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medidcine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowSamvel V. Apresyan
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Email: dr.apresyan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3281-707X
SPIN-code: 6317-9002
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medidcine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowEduard G. Nacharyan
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Email: ndg033@me.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-0081-915X
Russian Federation, Moscow
Maxim V. Kopylov
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: kopylov.surg@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8567-2225
SPIN-code: 5076-5623
Russian Federation, Moscow
Genrikh G. Kazarian
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Email: genro96@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3532-983X
SPIN-code: 7872-9168
Russian Federation, Moscow
Enar D. Jumaniazova
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Email: enar2017@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8226-0433
SPIN-code: 1780-5326
Russian Federation, Moscow
Victoria Е. Karyagina
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Email: vypryazhkina.viktoriya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-3484-9577
SPIN-code: 3833-6029
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science. 1965;150(3698):893–899. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3698.893 EDN: IDBJFX
- Park SY, Kim KH, Kim S, et al. BMP-2 gene delivery-based bone regeneration in dentistry. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(8):393. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11080393
- Sheikh Z, Javaid MA, Hamdan N, Hashmi R. Bone regeneration using bone morphogenetic proteins and various biomaterial carriers. Materials (Basel). 2015;8(4):1778–1816. doi: 10.3390/ma8041778 EDN: UPVUOJ
- Raza FB, Vijayaragavalu S, Vaidyanathan AK. Bone morphogenetic protein as bone additive around dental implant and its impact on osseointegration: a systematic review. J Dent (Shiraz). 2022;23(2 Suppl.):336–348. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.90931.1536
- Neovius E, Lemberger M, Docherty Skogh AC, et al. Alveolar bone healing accompanied by severe swelling in cleft children treated with bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivered by hydrogel. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(1):37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.08.015
- Wang M, Xu C, Zheng Y, et al. In vivo validation of osteoinductivity and biocompatibility of BMP-2 enriched calcium phosphate cement alongside retrospective description of its clinical adverse events. Int J Implant Dent. 2024;10(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00567-6 EDN: WXEWIK
- Tu B, Liu S, Liu G, et al. Macrophages derived from THP-1 promote the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through the IL-23/IL-23R/β-catenin pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2015;339(1):81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.015
- Ahmed MGT, Limmer A, Sucker C, et al. Differential regulation of CD45 expression on granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes in COVID-19. J Clin Med. 2022;11(14):4219. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144219 EDN: HBHVOF
Supplementary files
