Socioeconomic assessment of investments in dental anthropomorphic robots for practical training of dentistry students
- Authors: Tsarevskiy O.A.1, Grachev D.I.2, Yuzhakov A.A.3, Astashina N.B.4, Akhmedov K.G.2, Arutyunov S.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Bauman Moscow State Technical University
- Russian University of Medicine
- Perm National Research Polytechnic University
- Academician Ye.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 28, No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 634-641
- Section: Digital Dentistry
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1728-2802/article/view/313583
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent634166
- ID: 313583
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Robotics is a rapidly evolving area, especially in medical education, where robots improve the results of training and professional qualification of physicians. Dental anthropomorphic robot (DARs) are valuable tools that assist dentistry students in acquiring practical skills, expanding theoretical knowledge, and improving nonverbal communication skills. Given the current practical training issues, the use of such robots becomes increasingly relevant. However, high production and implementation costs require a detailed economic evaluation to assess the practicality of such devices.
AIM: To perform a socioeconomic assessment of investments in DARs for practical training of dentistry students.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A socioeconomic assessment of the use of DARs for practical training of dentistry students at a medical college was performed. The assessment focused on the cost-benefit analysis of implementing DARs for practical training. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the net present value (NPV), profitability index (PI), internal rate of return (IRR), and payoff period. The data were acquired from the Dentistry training program of the Russian University of Medicine. The data included training costs, robot purchase and maintenance costs, and organization of studies.
RESULTS: The use of one robot per 10 students results in a positive NPV of 54,279,963 rubles, with a PI of 5.52, an IRR of 70.79%, and a payoff period of approximately one and two years, respectively. These findings confirm the economic efficiency of the project. When using one robot per one student, the values are negative, indicating the economic inefficiency of this scenario.
CONCLUSION: The study showed that the use of DARs for practical training of dentistry students results in a high economic efficiency. High NPV, PI, and IRR values confirm the profitability of the project. Moreover, the robot improves practical skills by increasing the accuracy and speed of dental procedures.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Oleg A. Tsarevskiy
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: t1sarevskiy@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-8602-6305
SPIN-code: 7244-1376
Russian Federation, 5 2nd Baumanskaya street, 105005 Moscow
Dmitriy I. Grachev
Russian University of Medicine
Email: dr.grachev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5758-7485
SPIN-code: 2307-4380
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowAlexander A. Yuzhakov
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Email: uz@at.pstu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1865-2448
SPIN-code: 4820-8360
Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Professor
Russian Federation, PermNataliya B. Astashina
Academician Ye.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Email: astashina.nb@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1135-7833
SPIN-code: 6119-8171
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, PermKamalutdin G. Akhmedov
Russian University of Medicine
Email: kama05doc@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-5195-3942
SPIN-code: 8229-7763
Russian Federation, Moscow
Sergey A. Arutyunov
Russian University of Medicine
Email: sa.arutyunov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-7605-5715
SPIN-code: 4682-1730
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Bano S, Atif K, Mehdi SA. Systematic review: Potential effectiveness of educational robotics for century skills development in young learners. Education and Information Technologies. 2024;29:11135–11153. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12233-2
- Stasevych M, Zvarych V. Innovative robotic technologies and artificial intelligence in pharmacy and medicine: paving the way for the future of health care — a review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2023;7(3):147. doi: 10.3390/bdcc7030147
- Ahmad P, Alam MK, Aldajani A, et al. Dental robotics: a disruptive technology. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(10):3308. doi: 10.3390/s21103308
- Bernauer SA, Zitzmann NU, Joda T. The use and performance of artificial intelligence in prosthodontics: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(19):6628. doi: 10.3390/s21196628
- Battista A. An activity theory perspective of how scenario-based simulations support learning: a descriptive analysis. Adv Simul (Lond). 2017;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0055-0
- Isaksson J, Krabbe J, Ramklint M. Medical students’ experiences of working with simulated patients in challenging communication training. Adv Simul (Lond). 2022;7(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00230-3
- Koolivand H, Shooreshi MM, Safari-Faramani R, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of virtual reality-based education and conventional teaching methods in dental education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04954-2
- Thurzo A, Strunga M, Urban R, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence on dental education: a review and guide for curriculum update. Educ Sci. 2023;13(2):150. doi: 10.3390/educsci13020150
- Wang K, Sang GY, Huang LZ, et al. The effectiveness of educational robots in improving learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4637. doi: 10.3390/su15054637
- Astashina NB, Baidarov AA, Arutyunov SD, et al. Development of the “Anthropomorphic dental robot” complex with elements of artificial intelligence to simulate medical manipulations and doctor-patient communication. Perm Medical Journal. 2022;39(6):62–70. EDN: CNJATY doi: 10.17816/pmj39662-70
- Arutyunov SD, Yuzhakov AA, Kharakh YaN, et al. Interactive digital platform and cyberphysical systems of medical education. Parodontologiya. 2022;27(4):318–326. EDN: VTOFWY doi: 10.33925/1683-3759-2022-27-4-318-326
- Arutyunov SD, Yuzhakov AA, Kharakh YaN, et al. Dental simulator based on a robotic complex with an integrated smart jaw. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2023;27(1):63–70. EDN: LMGDRW doi: 10.17816/dent115139
- Yuzhakov AA, Arutyunov SD, Astashina NB, et al. Development of an anthropomorphic dental simulator based on the Robo-C robot. Vestnik IZHGTU imeni M.T. Kalashnikova. 2023;26(4):13–22. EDN: TGHLJC doi: 10.22213/2413-1172-2023-4-13-22
- Arduengo M, Sentis L. The robot economy: here it comes. International Journal of Social Robotics. 2021;13(5):937–994. EDN: YNKDDZ doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00686-1
- Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):598–606. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2
- Mahdi QS, Saleh IH, Hashim G, Loganathan GB. Evaluation of robot professor technology in teaching and business. Information Technology in Industry. 2021;9(1):1182–1194. doi: 10.17762/itii.v9i1.255
