Physicomechanical properties of modern Russian materials used for 3D printing of surgical guides: an uncontrolled laboratory study
- Authors: Androsov A.Y.1, Voronov I.A.1, Apresyan S.V.1, Stepanov A.G.1, Rusanov F.S.1, Zangieva O.T.1, Fedotov R.N.1, Kuprikov O.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
- Issue: Vol 29, No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 445-452
- Section: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1728-2802/article/view/366874
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent691238
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FIMIWC
- ID: 366874
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relevance of this study is supported by the integration of modern technologies into dental practice, including the use of surgical guides. Unfortunately, in recent years, foreign materials have often been either unavailable for purchase or prohibitively expensive. The use of materials produced in Russia ensures consistent availability, faster delivery, and competitive pricing. This study evaluates the physicomechanical properties of Russian-made materials used for fabricating surgical guides and determines how these properties change after sterilization by autoclaving.
AIM: This work aimed to assess the physicomechanical properties of Russian 3D printing materials intended for surgical guide fabrication before and after autoclave sterilization.
METHODS: Three types of domestically produced photopolymer resins were tested. Hardness, flexural modulus, and fracture toughness were evaluated before and after sterilization.
RESULTS: Flexural testing demonstrated that all three groups of Russian materials are suitable for use as finished surgical guides in accordance with the requirements of GOST R 71413-2024 Dentistry. Base Polymers. Part 2: Polymeric Orthodontic Base Materials. General Technical Requirements and Test Methods, which specifies a minimum flexural strength of 50 MPa and a minimum elastic modulus of 1500 MPa for the fabrication of bases intended for prolonged intraoral use. All tested material groups met these requirements, except the group 1 (“wet”) samples. However, because a surgical guide does not stay in the oral cavity for long and does not have sufficient time to absorb moisture, and because the mechanical load on a navigation guide is substantially lower, group 1 materials may also be recommended for guide fabrication.
Autoclaved samples from groups 1 and 2 demonstrated high fracture toughness values. In turn, group 3 samples remained stable, which may indicate a homogeneous internal structure of the material.
CONCLUSION: Material strength increased after autoclave sterilization. All tested material groups are suitable for fabrication of surgical guides, with group 3 demonstrating the most stable physicomechanical properties.
About the authors
Alexey Yu. Androsov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: Alecseyandrosov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-8513-0251
SPIN-code: 1296-0883
Russian Federation, Moscow
Igor A. Voronov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: voronov77@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6873-5869
SPIN-code: 8186-2654
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowSamvel V. Apresyan
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: apresyan@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3281-707X
SPIN-code: 6317-9002
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowAlexandr G. Stepanov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: stepanovmd@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6543-0998
SPIN-code: 5848-6077
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowFedor S. Rusanov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: diadya-fedor@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5280-0294
SPIN-code: 8739-0116
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowOlga T. Zangieva
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: olga.dok.oz@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7294-5247
SPIN-code: 7943-8959
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowRoman N. Fedotov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: abilat@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1802-1080
SPIN-code: 1777-9398
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowOleg S. Kuprikov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: olegkuprikov99@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-2095-3378
SPIN-code: 4062-5839
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Davreshyan GK, Apresyan SV, Stepanov AG, Zabaeva MN. Methodology for assessing the clinical and economic efficiency of digital navigation template technology. Actual Problems in Dentistry. 2025;21(2):212–220. doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-2025-21-2-212-220 EDN: VFXEFG
- Al-Dires AMA, Chikunov SO, Saleev RA, et al. Optimization of prosthetic dental rehabilitation for patients with immediate loading of dental implants: clinical studies. The Dental Institute. 2025;(2):36–41. EDN: SKZNWM
- Roshchin EM. Innovative CAD/CAM technologies in prosthetic dentistry: precision, aesthetics, durability of structures. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki», Seriya «Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2025;(2-1):214–219. doi: 10.37882/2223-2966.2025.02.29 EDN: BRMMZR
- Yepifanov SA, Shtempel MS, Mironyuk YuD. Historical aspects of the development of total temporomandibular joint replacement: from simple to complex. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2025;20(1):166–172. doi: 10.25881/20728255_2025_20_1_166 EDN: OACTVZ
- Abdyshev TK. Ten key innovations in dentistry over the last decade. Euroasian Health Journal. 2025;(2):215–222. doi: 10.54890/1694-8882-2025-2-215 EDN: YZWBQN
- Gnetov OA. Development of 3D printing in dentistry: how additive manufacturing is transforming the production of prostheses, crowns, aligners, and surgical templates. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2025;(6-1):39–51. doi: 10.24412/2500-1000-2025-6-1-39-51 EDN: HDVMAS
Supplementary files
