THE SCORE FOR THE ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF THE MANAGEMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the article the authors presented a modified score for the evaluation of the management of adult patients with craniopharyngioma. Its application allows to estimate dynamics of patients before and after surgery, and in following-up observation. The main advantage of the score is the possibility of its application in patients with impaired self-esteem, which is very important in cases of craniopharyngioma. The application of the proposed scale is possible in scientific research on groups of patients, during the medical-social examination and evaluation of the effectiveness of rehabilitation

About the authors

M. A Kutin

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

Email: kutin@nsi.ru
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

A. N Konovalov

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

P. L Kalinin

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

B. A Kadashev

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

N. K Serova

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

O. S Zaytsev

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

Yu. G Sidneva

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

L. I Astaf’eva

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

N. A Mazerkina

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

D. V Fomichev

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

O. I Sharipov

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

I. N Voronina

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

I. S Klochkova

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

I. V Zhadenova

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

A. N Savateev

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

Yu. V Strunina

N.N. Burdenko Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

E. V Sidoruk

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

119991, Russian Federation

References

  1. Jane J.A., Jr., Laws E.R. Craniopharyngioma. Pituitary. 2006; 9 (4): 323-6. doi: 10.1007/s11102-006-0413-8.
  2. Karavitaki N., Cudlip S., Adams C.B., Wass J.A. Craniopharyngiomas. Endocr. Rev. 2006; 27 (4): 371-97. doi: 10.1210/er.2006-0002.
  3. Prabhu V.C., Brown H.G. The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2005; 21 (8-9): 622-7. doi: 10.1007/s00381-005-1190-9.
  4. Brunel H., Raybaud C., Peretti-Viton P. et al. Craniopharyngioma in children: MRI study of 43 cases. Neuro-Chirurgie. 2002; 48 (4): 309-38.
  5. Crotty T.B., Scheithauer B.W., Young W.F., Jr. et al. Papillary craniopharyngioma: a clinicopathological study of 48 cases. J. Neurosurg. 1995; 83 (2): 206-14. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0206.
  6. Iwasaki K., Kondo A., Takahashi J.B., Yamanobe K. Intraventricular craniopharyngioma: report of two cases and review of the literature. Surg. Neurol. 1992; 38 (4): 294-301.
  7. Bunin G.R., Surawicz T.S., Witman P.A., Preston-Martin S., Davis F., Bruner J.M. The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. J. Neurosurg. 1998; 89 (4): 547-51. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0547.
  8. Samii M., Tatagoba M. Craniopharyngioma. In: Kaye A.H., Laws E.R., Jr. (Eds.). Brain Tumors: An Encyclopedic Approach. New York: Churcill Livingstone; 1995: 873-94.
  9. Rickert C.H., Paulus W. Epidemiology of central nervous system tumors in childhood and adolescence based on the new WHO classification. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2001; 17: 503-11.
  10. Caldarelli M., Massimi L., Tamburrini G., Cappa M., Di Rocco C. Long-term results of the surgical treatment of craniopharyngioma: the experience at the Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2005; 21 (8-9): 747-57. doi: 10.1007/s00381-005-1186-5.
  11. Sainte-Rose C., Puget S., Wray A. et al. Craniopharyngioma: the pendulum of surgical management. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2005; 21 (8-9): 691-5. doi: 10.1007/s00381-005-1209-2.
  12. Thompson D., Phipps K., Hayward R. Craniopharyngioma in childhood: our evidence-based approach to management. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2005; 21 (8-9): 660-8. doi: 10.1007/s00381-005-1210-9.
  13. Tomita T., Bowman R.M. Craniopharyngiomas in children: surgical experience at Children’s Memorial Hospital. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2005; 21 (8-9): 729-46. doi: 10.1007/s00381-005-1202-9.
  14. Zuccaro G. Radical resection of craniopharyngioma. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2005; 21 (8-9): 679-90. doi: 10.1007/s00381-005-1201-x.
  15. Mortini P., Losa M., Pozzobon G. et al. Neurosurgical treatment of craniopharyngioma in adults and children: early and long-term results in a large case series. J. Neurosurg. 2011; 114 (5): 1350-9. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.jns10670.
  16. Duo D., Gasverde S., Benech F., Zenga F., Giordana M.T. MIB-1 immunoreactivity in craniopharyngiomas: a clinico-pathological analysis. Clin. Neuropathol. 2003; 22 (5): 229-34.
  17. Dekkers O.M., Biermasz N.R., Smit J.W. et al. Quality of life in treated adult craniopharyngioma patients. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2006; 154 (3): 483-9. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02114.
  18. Kendall-Taylor P., Jonsson P.J., Abs R. et al. The clinical, metabolic and endocrine features and the quality of life in adults with childhood-onset craniopharyngioma compared with adult-onset craniopharyngioma. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2005; 152 (4): 557-67. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.01877.
  19. Spilker B. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: New-York Lippincott-Raven; 1996.
  20. Staquet M.J. Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials. Oxford, New-York, Tokyo: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  21. Новик А.А., Ионова Т.И. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине. М.: ОЛМА Медиагрупп; 2007.
  22. Кутин М.А., Сиднева Ю.Г., Ионова Т.И. Обзор шкал и опросников применяющихся для оценки «качества жизни» у пациентов с краниофарингиомами. Мед.-соц. эксперт. и реабил. 2016; 19 (4): 195-202. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/1560-9537-2016-19-4-195-202.
  23. Brazier J.E., Harper R., Jones N.M. et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.). 1992; 305 (6846): 160-4.
  24. Jenkinson C., Layte R., Jenkinson D. et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J. Publ. Hlth Med. 1997; 19 (2): 179-86.
  25. Varni J.W., Seid M., Rode C.A. The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med. Care. 1999; 37 (2): 126-39.
  26. Greenberg M.S., Arredondo N. Handbook of Neurosurgery (6th Ed.). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2006.
  27. Reisberg B., Ferris S.H., de Leon M.J., Crook T. The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1982; 139 (9): 1136-9.
  28. Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1983; 31 (12): 721-7.
  29. Duff J., Meyer F.B., Ilstrup D.M., Laws E.R., Jr., Schleck C.D., Scheithauer B.W. Long-term outcomes for surgically resected craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery. 2000; 46 (2): 291-302; discussion: 302-5.
  30. Elliott R.E., Sands S.A., Strom R.G., Wisoff J.H. Craniopharyngioma Clinical Status Scale: a standardized metric of preoperative function and posttreatment outcome. Neurosurg. Focus. 2010; 28 (4): E2. doi: 10.3171/2010.2.focus09304.
  31. Wen B.C., Hussey D.H., Staples J. et al. A comparison of the roles of surgery and radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Physics. 1989; 16 (1): 17-24.
  32. De Vile C.J., Grant G.D., Kendall B.E., Neville B.G., Stanhope R., Watkins K.E. Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted? J. Neurosurg. 1996; 85: 73-81.
  33. Кутин М.А., Сиднева Ю.Г., Коновалов А.Н. и др. Оценка качества жизни у пациентов с краниофарингиомами; особенности и затруднения применения стандартных подходов. Обзор литературы. Вестник неврологии, психиатрии и нейрохирургии. 2016; (1): 54-67.
  34. Fearon K., Strasser F., Anker S.D. et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12 (5): 489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7.
  35. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Hlth Org. Tech. Rep. Ser. 2000; 894: i-xii, 1-253.
  36. Кадашев Б.А. Аденомы гипофиза. Клиника, диагностика, лечение. М.: Триада; 2007.
  37. Кутин М.А., Кадашев Б.А., Калинин П.Л., Серова Н.К., Тропинская О.Ф., Андреев Д.Н. и др. Оценка эффективности декомпрессии каналов зрительных нервов интрадуральным субфронтальным доступом при удалении менингиом хиазмально-селлярной области. Журнал Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. 2014; 78 (4): 14-30.
  38. Кутин М.А, Серова Н.К., Калинин П.Л., Жаденова И.В., Фомичев Д.В., Шарипов О.И. Новая шкала оценки выраженности зрительных нарушений у пациентов с краниофарингиомами и другими образованиями хиазмально-селлярной области. Вестник неврологии, психиатрии и нейрохирургии. 2016; (12): 33-7.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2017 Eco-Vector



Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).