Applying decision tree algorithms to early differential diagnosis between different clinical forms of acute Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis
- Authors: Ilyinskikh E.N.1, Filatova E.N.1, Samoylov K.V.1, Semenova A.V.1, Axyonov S.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Siberian State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 28, No 5 (2023)
- Pages: 275-288
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1560-9529/article/view/148246
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/EID601806
- ID: 148246
Cite item
Abstract
Background: Tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis are the most common natural focal infections in Russia often arising as a mixed infection, which is often clinically difficult to distinguish from a monoinfection at the onset of the disease that is a result of delayed laboratory verification of the diagnosis and it requires further searching for fundamentally new approaches to the issue of early differential diagnosis of tick-borne infections.
Aims: is to develop decision tree algorithms for early differential diagnosis between the mono- and mixed forms of acute Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis with prevailing febrile syndrome in clinical picture based on clinical and laboratory data.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 55 clinical and laboratory parameters obtained from 291 hospitalized tick-borne infections patients with or without erythema migrans at the site of ixodid tick bites in the first week of the disease, who were included in the single-center study from 2010 to 2023. In 211 patients without erythema, the analysis was carried out between three classes depending on the diagnosis: the mixed infection of non-erythematous Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis, the mono-infection of non-erythematous Lyme borreliosis or the monoinfection of tick-borne encephalitis. The other two classes, which included 80 patients with erythema, had the mixed infection of acute erythematous Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis or erythematous Lyme borreliosis monoinfection. Python programming language was applied to develop two decision tree models. Feature importance was assessed for all predictors. Each patient class was randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Accuracy evaluation of the models was based on ROC analysis.
Results: The decision tree algorithm for early differential diagnosis among the tick-borne infection patients without erythema migrans included the following most important predictors: maximal fever rise, chills, neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio, ESR, absolute number of reactive lymphocytes and immature granulocytes, and percentage of eosinophils. The model for differential diagnosis between the patients with erythema migrans included the following predictors: maximal fever rise, the absolute number of reactive lymphocytes and immature granulocytes, and the percentage of basophils. Both decision tree models showed excellent predictive values based on sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and F1 scores, as well as areas under the ROC curve, which were higher than 0.90.
Conclusions: Based on clinical and laboratory parameters, two decision tree models with high sensitivity have been developed, which can be easily applied in clinical practice for early differential diagnosis of the tick-borne infections with prevailing fever syndrome.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ekaterina N. Ilyinskikh
Siberian State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: infconf2009@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7646-6905
SPIN-code: 5245-5958
Scopus Author ID: 6602611268
ResearcherId: P-1653-2016
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 TomskEvgenia N. Filatova
Siberian State Medical University
Email: synamber@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9951-8632
SPIN-code: 8094-3417
ResearcherId: AEQ-2635-2022
MD
Russian Federation, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 TomskKirill V. Samoylov
Siberian State Medical University
Email: samoilov.krl@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8477-8551
SPIN-code: 4710-0894
ResearcherId: HGC-9557-2022
MD
Russian Federation, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 TomskAlina V. Semenova
Siberian State Medical University
Email: wind_of_change95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5195-3897
SPIN-code: 2690-1166
ResearcherId: ACK-7745-2022
MD
Russian Federation, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 TomskSergey V. Axyonov
Siberian State Medical University
Email: axyonov@tpu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1251-7133
SPIN-code: 2229-4552
Scopus Author ID: 55543000900
ResearcherId: F-8210-2017
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 TomskReferences
- Lobzin YuV, Uskov AN, Kozlov SS. Laim-borrelioz: iksodovye kleshchevye borreliozy. Saint Petersburg: Foliant; 2000. 156 p. (In Russ).
- Ierusalimsky AP. Kleshchevoi entsefalit: rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. Novosibirsk: Gosudarstvennaya meditsinskaya akademiya MZ RF; 2001. 360 p. (In Russ).
- Bondarenko AL, Zykova IV, Abbasova SV, Tikhomolova EG, Nekhoroshkina EL. Mixed infection of tick-borne encephalitis and ixodes tick-borne borrelioses. Infektsionnye Bolezni. 2011;9(4):54–63. (In Russ).
- Subbotin AV, Semenov VA, Etenko DA. Problema sovremennykh smeshannykh neiroinfektsii, peredayushchikhsya iksodovymi kleshchami. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2012; (2(4)):35–39. (In Russ).
- Konkova-Reidman АB, Zlobin VI. Clinical polymorphism of ixodes tick-borne borrelioses (mixed infection with tick-borne encephalitis) on the territory of South-Ural region of Russia. Sibirskii meditsinskii zhurnal (Irkutsk). 2011;100(1):17–20. (In Russ).
- Minoranskaya NS, Minoranskaya EI. Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis mixed infection in Krasnoyarsk kray. Kazan Medical Journal. 2013; 94(2):211–215. (In Russ).
- Andronova NV, Minoranskaya NS, Minoranskaya EI. The specific immune response and some remote results in the acute course of tick-borne borreliosis and mixed-infection of tick-borne encephalitis and tick-borne borreliosis. Sibirskii meditsinskii zhurnal (Irkutsk). 2011;100(1):54–57. (In Russ).
- Tanner L, Schreiber M, Low JG, et al. Decision tree algorithms predict the diagnosis and outcome of dengue fever in the early phase of illness. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(3):e196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000196
- Tamibmaniam J, Hussin N, Cheah WK, Ng KS, Muninathan P. Proposal of a clinical decision tree algorithm using factors associated with severe dengue infection. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161696
- Dobrijević D, Andrijević L, Antić J, Rakić G, Pastor K. Hemogram-based decision tree models for discriminating COVID-19 from RSV in infants. J Clin Lab Anal. 2023;37(6):e24862. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24862
- Kumaran M, Pham TM, Wang K, et al. Predicting the risk factors associated with severe outcomes among COVID-19 patients-decision tree modeling approach. Front Public Health. 2022;10:838514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.838514
- Bruce P, Bruce A. Practical Statistics for Data Scientists. Saint Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburg; 2018. 304 p. (In Russ).
- Kowalska-Kępczyńska A, Mleczko M, Domerecka W, Krasowska D, Donica H. Assessment of immune cell activation in pemphigus. Cells. 2022;11(12):1912. doi: 10.3390/cells11121912
- Grebennikova IV, Lidokhova OV, Makeeva AV, et al. Age-depended changes of leukocyte indices in COVID-19. Naučno-medicinskij vestnik Central’nogo Černozem’â. 2022;(87): 9–15. (In Russ).
- Petrie A, Sabin K. Medical statistics at a glance. Leonov VP, editor. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. 216 p. (In Russ).
- Huang Y, Li S, Lin B, et al. Early detection of college students’ psychological problems based on decision tree model. Front Psychol. 2022;13:946998. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946998
- Mukhopadhyay S. Advanced data analytics using Python: with machine learning, deep learning and NLP examples. Kolkata : Apress Berkeley; 2018. 186 p. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4842-3450-1
- Kalafi EY, Nor NAM, Taib NA, et al. Machine learning and deep learning approaches in breast cancer survival prediction using clinical data. Folia Biol (Praha). 2019;65(5-6):212–220.
- Lakshmanan V, Sara Robinson S, Munn M. Machine learning. Design patterns. Saint Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburg; 2022. 448 p. (In Russ).
- Turk SP, Lumbard K, Liepshutz K, et al. Post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms score: Developing a new tool for research. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225012
- Minoranskaya NS, Uskov AN, Sarap PV. Importance of immune status for prognosis chronic borreliosis infections. Jurnal infektologii. 2014;6(1): 35–40. (In Russ).
- Suzdaltcev AA, Karavashkin NV, Kulagina AP. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of ixodic tick-borne borreliosis in the Samara region. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2021;16(3(93)):27–32. (In Russ).
- Bondarenko AL, Sapozhnikova VV. Analysis of clinical-epidemiological, laboratory parameters and cytokine status in patients with erythematous and non-erythematous forms of ixodes tick borreliosis. Infektsionnye Bolezni. 2018;16(2):34–42. (In Russ). doi: 10.20953/1729-9225-2018-2-34-42
- Blom K, Cuapio A, Sandberg JT, et al. Cell-mediated immune responses and immunopathogenesis of human tick-borne encephalitis virus-infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2174. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02174
- Rutkowska E, Kwiecień I, Kulik K, et al. Usefulness of the new hematological parameter: reactive lymphocytes RE-LYMP with flow cytometry markers of inflammation in COVID-19. Cells. 2021;10(1):82. doi: 10.3390/cells10010082
- Georgakopoulou VE, Makrodimitri S, Triantafyllou M, et al. Immature granulocytes: Innovative biomarker for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mol Med Rep. 2022;26(1):217. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12733
- Rizo-Téllez SA, Méndez-García LA, Flores-Rebollo C, et al. The neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio at admission predict in-hospital mortality in Mexican patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19). Microorganisms. 2020;8(10):1560. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101560
- Oehadian A, Michels M, de Mast Q, et al. New parameters available on Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzers contribute to differentiating dengue from leptospirosis and enteric fever. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37(6):861–868. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12422
Supplementary files
