Rb–Sr Age of Riphean Glauconites of the Kamo Group (Baikit Anteclise, Siberian Craton)
- Authors: Zaitseva T.S.1, Kuznetsov A.B.1, Ivanova N.A.2, Maslennikov M.A.2, Pustylnikova V.V.2, Turchenko T.L.1, Nagovitsin K.E.3
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics, and Mineral Resources
- Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum-Gas Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 488, No 1 (2019)
- Pages: 1013-1017
- Section: Geology
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1028-334X/article/view/195399
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X19090113
- ID: 195399
Cite item
Abstract
A mineralogical-geochemical study of globular phyllosilicates (GPS) of the glauconite-illite series of the Dolgokta Formation from the stratigraphic well Chunkinskaya Well 282 was conducted, and their Rb–Sr age was determined. The suitability of the mineral for geochronological studies was estimated based on the Mössbauer spectroscopy data and the model of cation distribution in the octahedral sheet of GPS. The mineralogical and crystallochemical characteristics indicate epigenetic defects in the glauconite crystal structure; therefore, its Rb–Sr isochronous age (1300 ± 7 Ma) is “rejuvenated” and reflects a partial recrystallization event. The 87Sr/86Sr ratio in dolomites of the Dolgokta and Kuyumba formations varies from 0.70602 to 0.72230 and thereby confirms the epigenetic recrystallization of rocks. The model Rb–Sr age of glauconite, which was estimated taking the enrichment in radiogenic 87Sr into account, is within 1340–1400 Ma. The age estimate defines the upper limit of the stratigraphic distribution of the Mesoproterozoic fossil Tappania that was found in the Yurubchen and Dolgokta formations of the Baikit Anteclise.
About the authors
T. S. Zaitseva
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: antonbor9@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
A. B. Kuznetsov
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: antonbor9@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
N. A. Ivanova
Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics,and Mineral Resources
Email: antonbor9@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630091
M. A. Maslennikov
Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics,and Mineral Resources
Email: antonbor9@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630091
V. V. Pustylnikova
Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics,and Mineral Resources
Email: antonbor9@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630091
T. L. Turchenko
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: antonbor9@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
K. E. Nagovitsin
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum-Gas Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: antonbor9@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
Supplementary files
