Email this article Personality, personality disorder, dysregulation of behavior and activities
- Authors: Gorinov V.V.1, Korzun D.N.1, Shekhovtsova E.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. Serbsky National Medical ResearchCentre for Psychiatry and Narcology" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol LI, No 3 (2019)
- Pages: 28-31
- Section: Editorial
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1027-4898/article/view/15589
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/nb15589
- ID: 15589
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
At the present stage, the problem of personality is a key aspect of research in all fields of knowledge. In General psychiatry and psychology, models are created that describe the structure of the individual, taking into account the various individual and personal components (characterological features, basic beliefs, I-concept), that is the most promising in modern science is the study of such variables as the integrity of the individual, the ability to take responsibility for their behavior, to make their own decisions, the flexibility of mental processes and behavior, the ability to develop mechanisms to adapt to stressful situations and the ability to social adaptation.
From a practical point of view, in modern forensic psychiatry the most urgent problem is the definition of disorders associated with personality pathology. This problem is of particular importance in the light of the changing approach to the diagnosis of personality disorders in the light of the new International classification of diseases of the 11th revision.
Also, within the framework of forensic psychiatry and psychology, the most urgent issue is the regulatory violations that affect the behavior of the individual in a criminal situation. So the behavior of persons with personality disorders is most influenced by individual psychological and situational features, which requires a more detailed analysis of motivational, prognostic and volitional disorders, preservation of the ability to self-regulation, purposeful behavior, planning and control of their actions. In this regard, the domestic of forensic psychiatry, the most urgent question of determining the possibility of application of the provisions of article 22 of the criminal code to the persons with personality disorders who have committed socially dangerous deysvtiya formulating criteria for forensic psychiatric evaluation of this pathology, the assessment of their danger to themselves and others in cases of need application recommendations.
About the authors
Viktor Vasil'evich Gorinov
Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: viktor-gorinov@yandex.ru
Doctor, Professor, Chief Researcher of the Department of psychogenic and
personality disorders
Dmitrij Nikolaevich Korzun
Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: dnk-k@yandex.ru
Doctor, Leading Researcherof the Department of psychogenic and personality
disorders
Elena Sergeevna Shekhovtsova
Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: shiha.l@mail.ru
Researcher of the Department of psychogenic and personality disorders
Moscow, Kropotkinskiy per., 23References
- Хромов А.Б. Пятифакторный опросник личности: Учебно-методическое пособие. Курган: Изд-во Курганского гос. университета, 2000: 3. [Khromov A.B. Pyatifaktornyy oprosnik lichnosti: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Kurgan: Izd-vo Kurganskogo gos. universiteta, 2000: 23].
- Романова Н.М. Психологическое описание криминальной деятельности // Известия Саратовского университета. Философия. Психология. Педагогика. 2011; Т. 11; 3: 98–101. [Romanova N.M. Psikhologicheskoe opisanie kriminalʹnoy deyatelʹnosti // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. 2011; T. 11; 3: 98–101.].
- Hovard R. PD and violence: what is the link? Borderline PD // J. Person. Disorders. 2015; 2: 2-23.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Arlington. American Psychiatric Association Publ., 2013.
- Bach B., Sellbom M. Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems // Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017; 136 (1): 108–117. doi: 10.1111/acps.12748.
- Crawford M.J. et al. Classifying personality disorder according to severity // J. Person Disorders. 2011; 25 (3): P. 321–330. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.321.
- World Health Organization. The ICD-11 Classification of Mental, Behavioral Disorders and Neurodevelopment Disorders. Geneca, 2018.
- Wilson C.M., Desmarais S.L., Nicholls T.L. et al. Predictive validity of dynamic factors: assessing violence risk in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Law Hum Behav. 2013; 37: 377-388. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000025.
- Корзун Д.Н., Ткаченко А.А. Нарушения уровней регуляции деятельности и юридический критерий ограниченной дееспособности вследствие психических расстройств // Пенитенциарная психиатрия. 2013: 68-73. [Korzun D.N., Tkachenko A.A. Narusheniya urovney regulyatsii deyatelʹnosti i yuridicheskiy kriteriy ogranichennoy deesposobnosti vsledstvie psikhicheskikh rasstroystv // Penitentsiarnaya psikhiatriya. 2013: 68-73.]
- Ильин Е. П. Эмоции и чувства. – СПб: Питер, 2001. – 752 с. [Ilʹin E. P. Ehmotsii i chuvstva. – SPb: Piter, 2001. – 752 p.]
- Белякова М.Ю., Булыгина В.Г. Исследование когнитивных подпроцессов саморегуляции, связанных с социальной апперцепцией, у лиц с психической патологией, совершивших общественно опасные деяния (ООД) // Медицинская (клиническая) психология: традиции и перспективы (К 85-летию Юрия Федоровича Полякова) : сборник тезисов Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, 2013: 28-29. [Belyakova M.YU., Bulygina V.G. Issledovanie kognitivnykh podprotsessov samoregulyatsii, svyazannykh s sotsialʹnoy appertseptsiey, u lits s psikhicheskoy patologiey, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya (OOD) // Meditsinskaya (klinicheskaya) psikhologiya: traditsii i perspektivy (K 85-letiyu Yuriya Fedorovicha Polyakova) : sbornik tezisov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 2013: 28-29.]
- Леонтьев Д.А. Психология смысла: природа, строение и динамика смысловой реальности. – 2-е изд. – М.: Смысл, 2003. –487 с. [Leontʹev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoy realʹnosti. – 2-e izd. – M.: Smysl, 2003. –487 p.].
- Зейгарник Б.В. Психология личности : норма и патология – М.-Воронеж : Институт практической психологии, 1998. – 352 с. [Zeygarnik B.V. Psikhologiya lichnosti : norma i patologiya – M.-Voronezh : Institut prakticheskoy psikhologii, 1998. – 352 p.].
- Зейгарник Б.В., Холмогорова А.Б., Мазур Е.С. Саморегуляция в норме и патологии / Психологический журнал. 1989; Т. 10; 2: 122-132. [Zeygarnik B.V., Kholmogorova A.B., Mazur E.S. Samoregulyatsiya v norme i patologii / Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 1989; T. 10; 2: 122-132.]
- Сафуанов Ф.С. Виды криминальной агрессии (по материалам судебной психолого-психиатрической экспертизы) // Механизмы человеческой агрессии / Под ред. Ю.М. Антоняна. – М.: ВНИИ МВД России, 2000: 131-149. [Safuanov F.S. Vidy kriminalʹnoy agressii (po materialam sudebnoy psikhologo-psikhiatricheskoy ehkspertizy) // Mekhanizmy chelovecheskoy agressii / Pod red. YU.M. Antonyana. – M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2000: 131-149.].
- Савина О.Ф., Макушкин Е.В., Морозова М.В. Алгоритм экспертного исследования дизрегуляции деятельности в криминальной ситуации у лиц с психическими расстройствами // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2018; 1:. 31-42. [Savina O.F., Makushkin E.V., Morozova M.V. Algoritm ehkspertnogo issledovaniya dizregulyatsii deyatelʹnosti v kriminalʹnoy situatsii u lits s psikhicheskimi rasstroystvami // Rossiyskiy psikhiatricheskiy zhurnal. 2018; 1:. 31-42.]. doi: 10.24411/1560-957X-2018-1.
- Quinton T.S., Brunton J.A. Implicit Processes, Self-Regulation, and Interventions for Behavior Change // Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 346-353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00346
Supplementary files
