Priority Imaging Technique in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer and Dental Hardware: a Literature Review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Purpose: To systematize the data on the possibilities of head and neck cancer visualization in patients with dental metal constructions using radial diagnostic methods and to choose the most informative one.

About the authors

Y. A. Vasilev

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies

Email: KontorovichDS@zdrav.mos.ru
Moscow, Russia

D. S. Kontorovich

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies

Email: KontorovichDS@zdrav.mos.ru
Moscow, Russia

R. V. Reshetnikov

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies

Email: KontorovichDS@zdrav.mos.ru
Moscow, Russia

I. A. Blokhin

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies

Email: KontorovichDS@zdrav.mos.ru
Moscow, Russia

D. S. Semenov

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies

Email: KontorovichDS@zdrav.mos.ru
Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clinicians. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
  2. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2020 godu: (zabolevaemost’ i smertnost’) / pod redakciej A.D. Kaprina, V.V. Starinskogo, A.O. Shahzadavoj – M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gercena – filial FGBU ”NMIC radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, – 2021. – 252 s
  3. Li L, Sun J, Li B, et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis of head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. OTT. June 2015:1291. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S73924
  4. Arya S, Rane P, Deshmukh A. Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Role of pretreatment imaging and its influence on management. Clinical Radiology. 2014;69(9):916-930. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.04.013
  5. Alfouzan AF. Radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. SMJ. 2021;42(3):247-254. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20210660
  6. Hauck KE, Trentin MS, Skiba THI, Shibli JA, De Carli JP. Clinical and satisfaction outcomes of using one or two dental implants for mandibular overdentures: preliminary short-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00286-8
  7. Kubo Y, Ito K, Sone M, et al. Diagnostic value of model-based iterative reconstruction combined with a metal artifact reduction algorithm during ct of the oral cavity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(11):2132-2138. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6767
  8. Artefakty ot metallokonstrukcij v magnitno-rezonansnoj tomografii: metodicheskie rekomendacii / Yu.A. Vasil’ev, D.S. Semenov, O.Yu. Panina [i dr.] // Seriya «Luchshie praktiki luchevoj i instrumental’noj diagnostiki». – Vyp. 83. – M. : GBUZ «NPKC DiT DZM», 2022. –40 s.
  9. Khodarahmi I, Isaac A, Fishman EK, Dalili D, Fritz J. Metal about the hip and artifact reduction techniques: from basic concepts to advanced imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2019;23(03):e68-e81. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687898
  10. Kamila N. K. (ed.). Handbook of research on emerging perspectives in intelligent pattern recognition, analysis, and image processing. – 2015.
  11. Yudin A.L., Shсhetinin R.A., Afanas’eva N.I. Cancer of the tongue and floor of the mouth: Current aspects of diagnosis. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2015;(5):42-48. (In Russ.)https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2015-0-5-84-89
  12. Hiyama T, Kuno H, Sekiya K, Tsushima S, Oda S, Kobayashi T. Subtraction iodine imaging with area detector CT to improve tumor delineation and measurability of tumor size and depth of invasion in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Jpn J Radiol. 2022;40(2):167-176. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01196-4
  13. Hirata K, Utsunomiya D, Oda S, et al. Added value of a single-energy projection-based metal-artifact reduction algorithm for the computed tomography evaluation of oral cavity cancers. Jpn J Radiol. 2015;33(10):650-656. doi: 10.1007/s11604-015-0471-9
  14. Hong HR, Jin S, Koo HJ, et al. Clinical values of18F‐FDG PET/CT in oral cavity cancer with dental artifacts on CT or MRI. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014;110(6):696-701. doi: 10.1002/jso.23691
  15. Mesia R, Iglesias L, Lambea J, et al. SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of head and neck cancer (2020). Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(5):913-921. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02533-1
  16. Castelijns JA, Van Den Brekel MWM, Hermans R. Imaging of the larynx. Seminars in Roentgenology. 2000;35(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/S0037-198X(00)80030-9
  17. Verduijn GM, Bartels LW, Raaijmakers CPJ, Terhaard CHJ, Pameijer FA, Van Den Berg CAT. Magnetic resonance imaging protocol optimization for delineation of gross tumor volume in hypopharyngeal and laryngeal tumors. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2009;74(2):630-636. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.014
  18. Sergunova K.A., Akhmad E.S., Petryaykin A.V., Kivasev S.A., Semenov D.S., Vasil’ev Yu.A., Morozov S.P., Vladzimirskiy A.V., Nizovtsova L.A. Magnetic resonance safety for patients with implanted medical devices. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2019; 20 (4): 313–23 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/ 1810-0694-2019-20-4-313-323
  19. Kaprin A. D. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. Rak nosoglotki. – 2020.
  20. Kaprin A. D. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya polosti rta – 2020.
  21. Kaprin A. D. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. Rak rotoglotki. – 2024.
  22. Petrovichev VS, Neklyudova MV, Sinitsyn VE, Nikitin IG. Dual-energy computed tomography for head and neck cancer. Digital Diagnostics. 2021;2(3):343-355. doi: 10.17816/DD62572
  23. Toepker M, Czerny C, Ringl H, et al. Can dual-energy CT improve the assessment of tumor margins in oral cancer? Oral Oncology. 2014;50(3):221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.12.001
  24. Parakh A, Lennartz S, An C, et al. Dual-energy ct images: pearls and pitfalls. RadioGraphics. 2021;41(1):98-119. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200102
  25. Bayer N, May MS, Wuest W, et al. Iterative metal artifact reduction in head and neck ct facilitates tumor visualization of oral and oropharyngeal cancer obscured by artifacts from dental hardware. Academic Radiology. 2023;30(12):2962-2972. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.04.007
  26. Utility model No. 190308 U1 the Russian Federation, IPC A61B 6/02. Ustrojstvo fantoma dlya ocenki effektivnosti algoritmov i metodov podavleniya artefaktov ot metallokonstrukcij pri provedenii komp’yuternoj tomografii [Phantom design for assessing the effectiveness of algorithms and methods for suppressing metal artifacts in computed tomography] : No. 2019105941 : submitted 04.03.2019 : published 25.06.2019 / K.A. Sergunova, A.V. Petraikin, D.S. Semenov [et al.] ; submitter Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department.
  27. Sergunova K. A. i dr. Osnovy bezopasnosti pri provedenii magnitno-rezonansnoj tomografii //Metodicheskie rekomendacii. – 2019. –№. 63.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).