Intellectual Elites as a Target of the U.S. Public Diplomacy in the South Caucasus
- Authors: Artamonova U.Z.1
-
Affiliations:
- Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)
- Issue: No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 108-121
- Section: ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ЭЛИТЫ В ФОКУСЕ
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/0869-0499/article/view/360027
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S2712910125050091
- ID: 360027
Cite item
Abstract
The study focuses on American international exchange programs aimed at the intellectual elites from the areas of social sciences and humanities, specifically the Fulbright Visiting Scholar Program (FVSP). Such intellectual elites potentially influence the opinions of students and younger generation in general; broadcast their views and values to political elites of their countries; shape dominating domestic approaches to research and education; and even create a wider social consensus over certain topics. Historic experience shows that the intensification of such activities in U.S. politics has always been prompted by the sense of a threat to national security. Thus, the increase of such programs aimed at the former Soviet republics following the collapse of the USSR is a manifestation of the same pattern with a possibility of Russia allying itself with other republics politically, economically and militarily being perceived as such a threat. Therefore, the core political reason behind those programs is to avoid such an undesirable scenario. The analysis of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the participants in the FVSP from Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan is conducted to illustrate how specifics and trends of the program’s implementation vary in different countries depending on the U.S. economic and geopolitical interests.
About the authors
U. Z. Artamonova
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)
Author for correspondence.
Email: artamonova.u@imemo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1825-9291
Candidate of Sciences (Political Sciences), Research Fellow, Center for North American Studies, IMEMO RAS
Moscow, RussiaReferences
- Artamonova U. (2023) International Exchanges as an Instrument of American Public Diplomacy. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura. No. 12, pp. 86–98. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673023120088 (In Russ.)
- Burks R.V. (1967) Social Forces and Cultural Change. In: The United States and Eastern Europe. Ed.: R.F. Byrnes. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Pp. 81–100.
- Byrnes R.F. (1976) Soviet-American academic exchanges, 1958–1975. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 275 p. https://doi.org/10.2979/Soviet-AmericanAcade
- Clark M.C., Wilson A.L. (1991) Context and Rationality in Mezirow's Theory of Transformational Learning Adult Education Quarterly. No. 41. Pp. 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041002002
- Johnson L.R. (2018) The Fulbright Program and the philosophy and geography of US exchange programs since World War II. In: Global Exchanges. Scholarships and Transnational Circulations in the Modern World. Eds.: L. Tournès, G. Scott-Smith. New York – Oxford: Berghahn. Pp. 173–187. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785337024
- Kirkgoz Y. (2017) Exploring the Impact of the Fulbright Foreign Language Teaching Assistant Program on Grantees’ Educational and Cultural Beliefs and Practices. In: International Education Exchanges and Intercultural Understanding. Ed.: J. Mathews-Aydinli. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43829-0_9
- Krys’ko V.G. (1999) Sekrety psikhologicheskoi voiny (tseli, zadachi, metody, formy, opyt) [Secrets of Psychological War (purposes, objectives, methods, forms, experiences)]. Minsk: Harvest. 446 p. (In Russ.)
- Machavariani G. (2016) History of Georgia – United States Relations in the Light of Strategic Interests of the USA in the South Caucasus Region. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 131–134. (In Russ.)
- Malyshev D. (2019) The Commonwealth of Independent States: Spatial and Organizational Dynamics. Analiz i prognoz. Zhurnal IMEMO RAN. No 3, pp. 23–36. https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2019-3-23-36
- Tsvetkova N.A. (2006) Cultural imperialism: mezhdunarodnaja obrazovatel'naja politika SShA v gody holodnoj vojny [Cultural imperialism: the U.S. international education policy during the Cold War]. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg’s State University Publishing. 200 p. (In Russ.)
- Tsvetkova N.A. (2007) Assessment of the effectiveness of the educational policies of the USSR and the U.S. during the Cold War. 200 let rossiisko-amerikanskim otnosheniyam: nauka i obrazovanie. Sbornik statei. Ed (s): Chubar'yan A.O., Rubl B.A. Moscow: OLMA Media Group. Pp. 378–394. (In Russ.)
- Tsvetkova N.A. (2015) Publichnaya diplomatiya kak instrument ideologicheskoi i politicheskoi ekspansii SShA v mire, 1914–2014 gg [Public diplomacy as an instrument of ideological and cultural expansion of the U.S. in the world]. Dr. Diss. (Hist.). Saint-Petersburg. 552 p. (In Russ.)
- Tsvetkova N.A. (2017) Is the Americanization of universities possible? U.S. reforms in Turkey, 1955–1968. Americana. Kholodnaya voina, vneshnyaya politika i amerikanskoe obshchestvo. Sbornik statei. Ed (s): A.I. Kubyshkin, I.I. Kurilla, T.V. Nelin. Volgograd: VolGU Publishing. Vol. 15. Pp. 310–328. (In Russ.)
- Tsvetkova N.А. (2017) Why cultural imperialism is impossible? American and Soviet approaches to German universities during the Cold War. Ab Imperio. no. 2, pp. 144–175. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2017.0034 (In Russ.)
Supplementary files


