The U.S. and the EU Reaction on Syria's Change of Power

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the approaches taken by the U.S. and the EU toward the change of power in Syria that occurred in December 2024. It examines each side's stance toward the old and new Syrian governments, changes in sanctions regimes, approaches to geopolitical adversaries such as Russia and Iran, as well as policies regarding Turkey, the Islamic State*, and Israel. The article concludes that for the U.S. – especially during the Trump administration – the primary focus lies in ensuring Israel's security and eliminating Iranian influence in Syria. In contrast, the EU emphasizes creating conditions for the repatriation of Syrian refugees and geopolitical confrontation with Russia. These differences may eventually lead to a strategic divergence between the U.S. and the EU in their respective policies on Syria.

About the authors

A. V Yurk

Georgy Arbatov Institute for U.S. and Canada Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: alexey.yurk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3485-8588
Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Бубнова Н.И. Военно-политический курс США во втором десятилетии XXI века. М.: Политическая энциклопедия, 2021.
  2. Оганнисян Л.Д. Дилеммы сирийской политики ЕС. Современная Европа. 2020. № 1. С. 91–101. doi: 10.15211/soveurope1202091101
  3. Юрк А.В. Сирийский фактор в отношениях Турции и НАТО: досадная помеха или начало конца блоковой солидарности? Азия и Африка сегодня. 2021. № 6. С. 20–26. doi: 10.31857/S032150750015268-6
  4. Zelin A. Trump Meets Sharaa: Writing a New Chapter in U.S.-Syria Relations. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 14.05.2025. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/trump-meets-sharaa-writing-new-chapter-us-syria-relations (accessed 14.09.2025)
  5. Lister C. US has fallen behind the region when it comes to seizing the opportunity in post-Assad Syria. Middle East Institute, 12.05.2025. https://mei.edu/publications/trump-travels-middle-east-transition#lister (accessed 16.09.2025)
  6. Levitt M., Margolin D., Medini S., Schenker D. Seizing the Moment of Opportunity in Syria: Guidelines for U.S. Action. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 22.05.2025. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/seizing-moment-opportunity-syria-guidelines-us-action (accessed 16.09.2025)
  7. Pinfold R.G. 2025. Myth Busting in a Post-Assad Syria. Middle East Policy. Vol. 32. № 1. Pp. 3–21. doi: 10.1111/mepo.12799
  8. Karlin M. Seizing the opening in Syria and Lebanon. Brookings Institution, 07.11.2025. https://brookings.edu/articles/seizing-the-opening-in-syria-and-lebanon/ (accessed 13.11.2025)
  9. Barnes-Dacey J. The point of no return: Why the EU must not send Syrians refugees back. ECFR, 17.10.2024. https://ecfr.eu/article/the-point-of-no-return-why-the-eu-must-not-send-syrians-refugees-back/ (accessed 21.09.2025)
  10. Petillo K. How European leaders can support sustainable refugee returns in a post-Assad Syria. ECFR, 16.12.2024. https://ecfr.eu/article/how-european-leaders-can-support-sustainable-refugee-returns-in-a-post-assad-syria/ (accessed 21.09.2025)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences


 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).