The soundscape of the metropolis: the influence of human adaptation to the sound environment on the assessment of its quality

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The creation of quiet green areas to reduce acoustic stress contributes to improving the quality of life of citizens in noisy cities, reducing stress levels and enhancing the uniqueness of urban spaces. Quantitative indicators for assessing the quality of the sound environment are in demand when designing such zones, ensuring harmony between urban dynamics and the human need for silence. It is believed that human adaptation to the sound environment leads to the fact that residents of megacities stop noticing annoying sounds, although this does not negate their harmful effects on the nervous system, causing its exhaustion. In the interest of studying the properties of perception of the sound environment depending on its properties, as well as the degree of adaptation of residents to the environment, a cross-comparison of assessments of the quality of the sound environment, as well as the values of acoustic characteristics of spaces in the territories adjacent to the building, was carried out. The survey was conducted by two groups of respondents in academic buildings of two leading universities — MSU and MSTU. The first group consisted of 30 third-year students from Moscow State University, the second group consisted of 25 third-year students from Moscow State Technical University. To assess the quality of the sound environment, the hearing examination method introduced by the International Organization for Standardization for the Analysis of Soundscapes (ISO) was used. We assumed that the students of the two universities are well adapted to the sound and landscape environment of Moscow, and over the years they have developed a sustainable attitude towards the environment of their university. A comparison of estimates of the quality of sound media and their acoustic properties indicates that MSU students were less sensitive to loud noises and quiet sounds of nature in the territories of the two universities. The reason for such differences may be the adaptation of MSU students to the environment of their university, which promotes natural audiovisual relaxation and increases psycho-emotional stability.

About the authors

N. G. Kanev

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

Email: nikolay.kanev@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia

L. K. Rimskaya-Korsakova

JSC “N.N. Andreev Acoustics Institute”

Moscow, Russia

I. L. Margolina

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Moscow, Russia

A. I. Komkin

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Паспорт федерального проекта “Формирование комфортной городской среды”. Минстрой РФ, 2024. https://www.minstroyrf.gov.ru/docs/140232/
  2. Руководство по вопросам шума в окружающей среде для Европейского региона. WHO Region Office for Europe, 2018, www.euro.who.int
  3. СанПиН 1.2.3685-21 Гигиенические нормативы и требования к обеспечению безопасности и (или) безвредности для человека факторов среды обитания.
  4. Zhang R., Ma H., Wang C., Zhang Y., Kang J. Soundscape and its context: A framework based on a systematic review // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2022, V. 157(7), P. 4417–4436.
  5. ISO/TS12913-1:2014, “Acoustics–Soundscape–Part1: Definition and conceptual framework” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
  6. ISO/TS12913-2:2018, “Acoustics–Soundscape–Part2: Data collection and reporting requirements” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
  7. ISO/TS12913-3:2019, “Acoustics–Soundscape–Part3: Data analysis” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
  8. Ozturk Z.S., Kang J., Aletta F. Soundscape Research in Streets: A Scoping Review // Sustainability. 2025. V. 17. 3329.
  9. Papadakis N.M., Aletta А., Kang J., Oberman T., Mitchell A., Aroni I., Stavroulakis G.E City, town, village: Potential differences in residents soundscape perception using ISO/TS 12913-2:2018 // Applied Acoustics. 2023. V. 213. 109659.
  10. Bouzir T., Berkouk D., Eisenman T.S., Schwela D., Arab D., Gomma M.M., Boucherti S. Soundscapes in Arab Cities: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda // Sound Vibr. 2024. V. 58(1). 046723.
  11. Римская-Корсакова Л.К., Канев Н.Г., Комкин А.Н., Шуляпов С.А. Звуковые ландшафты в городской среде: субъективное восприятие и объективный контроль // Акуст. журн. 2024. Т. 70. № 6. C. 921–932.
  12. Римская-Корсакова Л.К., Канев Н.Г., Комкин А.Н., Маргалина Н.Л., Калюжная И.Ю. Сравнение звуковых ландшафтов вблизи двух университетов г. Москвы // Сборник трудов XXXVI сессии Российского акустического общества, 21–25 октября 2024, г. Москва. C. 475–480.
  13. Chung A.W.L., To W.M. Mapping Soundscape Research: Authors, Institutions, and Collaboration Networks // Acoustics. 2025. V. 7. P. 38.
  14. Fang X., Aletta F., Mitchell A., Oberman T., Kang J. Determining factors for the appropriateness of soundscapes: A cross-sectional large-sample study in London (UK) // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2024. V. 156(5). P. 3588–3607.
  15. Cal H.K., Aletta F., Kang J. Perception of indoor and outdoor school soundscapes: A large-scale Cross-Sectional survey with UK teachers // Appl. Acoust. 2025. V. 227. 110219.
  16. Deng L., Kang J., Zhao W., Jambrošić K. Cross-National Comparison of Soundscape in Urban Public Open Spaces between China and Croatia // Applied Sciences. 2020. V. 10(3). P. 960.
  17. Aletta F., Oberman T., Mitchell A., Erfanian M., Kang J. Soundscape experience of public spaces in different world regions: A comparison between the European and Chinese contexts via a large-scale on-site survey // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2023. V. 154 (3). P. 1710–1734.
  18. Bruce N.S. Extending Soundwalking Practice: Soundstitting as an Inclusive and Complementary Method to Soundwalking // Acoustics. 2023. V. 5. P. 788–797.
  19. Russell J.A. A circumplex model of affect // J. Personality and Social Psychology. 1980. V. 39(6). P. 1161–1178.
  20. Laszlo H.E., McRobie E.S., Stansfeld S.A., Hansell A.L. Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure – A review // Sci. Tot. Environ. 2012. V. 435–436. P. 551–562.
  21. Samodra F.X.T.B. Soundscape elaboration from anthroponic adaptation of community Noise // IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2018. V. 126. 012034.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).