Obtaining Methanol from CO2 on Cu–Zn/Al2O3 and Cu–Zn/SiO2 Catalysts: Effect of the Support and Conditions of the Reaction

K. O. Kim; Ким К. О.; A. A. Shesterkina; Шестеркина А. А.; M. A. Tedeeva; Тедеева М. А.; K. E. Kartavova; Картавова К. Е.; P. V. Pribytkov; Прибытков П. В.; S. F. Dunaev; Дунаев С. Ф.; A. L. Kustov; Кустов А. Л.

doi:10.31857/S0044453723040179

Obtaining Methanol from CO2 on Cu–Zn/Al2O3 and Cu–Zn/SiO2 Catalysts: Effect of the Support and Conditions of the Reaction

Authors: Kim K.O.¹, Shesterkina A.A.¹^,2, Tedeeva M.A.¹, Kartavova K.E.¹, Pribytkov P.V.¹, Dunaev S.F.¹, Kustov A.L.¹^,2
Affiliations:
1. Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University
2. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 97, No 4 (2023)
Pages: 495-499
Section: ХИМИЧЕСКАЯ КИНЕТИКА И КАТАЛИЗ
Submitted: 15.10.2023
Published: 01.04.2023
URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/0044-4537/article/view/136553
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453723040179
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TGBKPM
ID: 136553

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

A study is performed of the catalytic properties of Cu–Zn catalysts on Al2O3 and SiO2 supports (Acros) in the reaction of CO2 hydrogenation to obtain methanol. A sample of 30Cu15Zn/Al2O3 displays great selectivity toward methanol. A sample of 30Cu15Zn/SiO2 has the highest methanol performance. The methanol performance of a sample of 10Cu5Zn/Al2O3 is doubled when the pressure is raised from 10 to 30 atm, and a 94% increase in selectivity is observed. A sample of catalyst 10Cu5Zn/SiO2 does not lose its activity after 10 h of a catalytic reaction, and its methanol performance grows with repeated use

Keywords

bimetallic catalysts, copper oxide, zinc oxide, silica gel, aluminum oxide, carbon dioxide hydrogenation, methanol production, utilization of carbon dioxide

References

Evdokimenko N.D., Kustov A.L., Kim K.O. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2018. V. 28. P. 147.
Pokusaeva Y.A., Koklin A.E., Lunin V.V. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2019. V. 29. P. 382.
Evdokimenko N.D., Kustov A.L., Kim K.O. et al. // Funct. Matter. Lett. 2020. V. 2040004. P. 1.
Chernyak S.A., Ivanov A.S., Stolbov D.N. et al. // Carbon. 2020. V. 168. P. 475.
Bogdan V.I., Koklin A.E., Kustov A.L. et al. // Molecules. 2021. V. 26. P. 2883.
Konopatsky A.S., Firestein K.L., Evdokimenko N.D. et al. // J. Catal. 2021. V. 402. P. 130.
Kovalskii A.M., Volkov I.N., Evdokimenko N.D. et al. // Appl. Catal. B. 2022. V. 303. P. 120891.
Evdokimenko N.D., Kapustin G.I., Tkachenko O.P. et al. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. P. 1065.
Zeolites and Zeolite-like Materials / Ed. by B.F. Sels, L.M. Kustov. 2016. P. 1–459.
Tursunov O., Kustov L., Tilyabaev Z. // J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 2019. V. 180. P. 773.
Tursunov O., Kustov L., and Kustov A. // Oil and Gas Sci. Technol. 2017. V. 72 (5). P. 30.
Tursunov O., Kustov L., and Tilyabaev Z. // J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Engineers 2017. V. 78. P. 416.
Kurtz M. // Catal. Lett. 2003. V. 86. P. 77.
Saito M. // Catal. Surv. From Asia. 2004. V. 8. P. 285.
Ma J., Sun N.N., Zhang X.L. et al. // Catal. Today. 2009. V. 148. P. 221.
Wang W., Wang S., Ma X. et al. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011. V. 40. P. 3703.
Jiang Y. // J. CO2 Util. 2018. V. 26. P. 642.
Dasireddy V.D.B.C., Likozar B. // Ren. En. 2019. V. 140. P. 452.
Meunier N., Chauvy R., Mouhoubi S. et al. // Ren. En. 2020. V. 146. P. 1192.
Fang X., Xi Y., Jia H. et al. // J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020. V. 88. P. 268.
Kropp T., Paier J., Sauer J. // J. Catal. 2017. V. 352. P. 382.
Gribovskii A., Ovchinnikova E., Vernikovskaya N. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2017. V. 308. P. 135.
Losch P., Pinar A.B., Willinger M.G. et al. // J. Catal. 2017. V. 345. P. 11.
Wang X., Li R., Bakhtiar S. ul H. et al. // Catal. Commun. 2018. V. 108. P. 64.
Niu X., Gao J., Wang K. et al. // Fuel Process Technol. 2017. V. 157. P. 99.
Yang L., Liu Z., Liu Z. et al. // Chin. J. Catal. 2017. V. 38 (4). P. 683.
Pirola C., Galli F., Bianchi C.L. et al. // En. Fuels. 2014. V. 28 (8). P. 5236.
Boffito D.C., Galli F., Martinez P.R. et al. // Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014. V. 43. P. 427.
Sun Q. // J. Catal. 1997. V. 167. P. 92.
Mierczynski P. // Catal. Today. 2011. V. 176. P. 21.
Bogdan V.I., Kustov L.M. // Mendeleev Commun. 2015. V. 25. P. 446.
Ren H. // J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015. V. 28. P. 261.
Bukhtiyarova M. // Catal. Lett. 2017. V. 147. P. 416.
Zhang C. // J. CO2 Util. 2017. V. 17. P. 263.
Sloczynski J., Grabowski R., Kozlowska A. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2004. V. 278. P. 11.
Evdokimenko N.D., Kim K.O., Kapustin G.I. et al. // Catal. Ind. 2018. V. 10. P. 288.
Kim K.O., Evdokimenko N.D., Pribytkov P.V. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2021. V. 95. P. 2422.