尿道疼痛综合征患者:心理画像

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

本文介绍了一例慢性盆腔疼痛综合征患者的心理特征,特别是其组成部分—尿道疼痛综合征。还强调了这类患者内在的主要具体人格特征,确定了发展为尿道疼痛综合征的危险因素,包括心理因素。为医生提供了管理这类患者的建议,特别是使用心理量表和旨在确定特定特征标记的问卷。

作者简介

Mariya Khalak

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: m-e-h@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1897-8894
SPIN 代码: 9670-8556

Cand. Sci. (Psy.), assistant of the Department of General and Clinical Psychology

俄罗斯联邦, 10/1 sq. Minina & Pojarskogo, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950

Muhammad Molvi

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Email: msmolvi@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7846-4356

Postgraduate student, Department of Urology after named  E.V. Shakhov

俄罗斯联邦, 10/1 sq. Minina & Pojarskogo, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950

Valery Lazukin

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Email: valery-laz@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0916-0468
SPIN 代码: 3400-9905

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Associate Professor of the Department of Medical Physics and Informatics 

俄罗斯联邦, 10/1 sq. Minina & Pojarskogo, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950

Elena Bozhkova

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Email: readytotalk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0105-0360
SPIN 代码: 2887-9548

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Acting Head of the Department of General and Clinical Psychology

俄罗斯联邦, 10/1 sq. Minina & Pojarskogo, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950

Olga Streltsova

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Email: strelzova_uro@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9097-0267
SPIN 代码: 9674-0382

Doc. Sci. (Med.), Department of Urology after named  E.V. Shakhov

俄罗斯联邦, 10/1 sq. Minina & Pojarskogo, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950

参考

  1. Rothberg MB, Wong JD. All Dysuria Is Local A Cost-effectiveness Model for Designing Site-specific Management Algorithms. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(5 Pt 1):433–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.10440.x
  2. Sung TC. Is Urethral Pain Syndrome Really Part of Bladder Pain Syndrome? Urogenit Tract Infect. 2017;12(1):22–27. doi: 10.14777/uti.2017.12.1.22
  3. Phillip H, Okewole I, Chilaka V. Enigma of urethral pain syndrome: Why are there so many ascribed etiologies and therapeutic approaches? International J Urol. 2014;21:544–548. doi: 10.1111/iju.12396
  4. Esin RG, Fedorenko AI, Gorobets EA. Chronic non-specific pelvic pain in the case of women: multidisciplinary issue. Medical Almanac. 2017;5(50):97–101. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21145/2499-9954-2017-5-97-101
  5. Belyakov KM, Streltsova OS, Antipenko EA, et al. Possibilities of the pudendal nerve studying in chronic urethral pain syndrome using magnetic stimulation method. Medical Almanac. 2020;2(63):64–70. (In Russ.)
  6. Piontek K, Ketels G, Albrecht R, et al. Somatic and psychosocial determinants of symptom severity and quality of life in male and female patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2019;120:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.02.010
  7. Passavanti MB, Pota V, Sansone P, et al. Chronic Pelvic Pain: Assessment, Evaluation, and Objectivation. Pain Res. Treat. 2017;2017:9472925. doi: 10.1155/2017/9472925
  8. Smith CP. Male chronic pelvic pain: an update. Indian J Urol. 2016;32(1):34–39. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.173105
  9. Aziz Q, Giamberardino MA, Barke A, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: Chronic visceral pain. Pain. 2019;160(1);69–76. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001362
  10. EAU [Internet]. Engeler D, Baranowski AP, Borovicka J, et al. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain, 2021. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/chronic-pelvic-pain
  11. Stenjaeva NN, Apolihina IA. Hronicheskaja tazovaja bol’: psihosomaticheskie aspekty. Consilium Medicum. 2012;6(14):19–20. (In Russ.)
  12. Naliboff BD, Stephens AJ, Afari N, et al. Widespread Psychosocial Difficulties in Men and Women with Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndromes: Casecontrol Findings From the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain Research Network. J Urol. 2015;85(6):1319–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.047.14
  13. Kirmayer LJ, Groleau D, Looper KJ, et al. Explaining medically unexplained symptoms. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49(10):663–671. doi: 10.1177/070674370404901003
  14. Osipova VV. Pain: psychological aspects. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2010;2(1):4–9. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2010-62
  15. Shoskes DA, Nickel JC, Kattan MW. Phenotypically directed multimodal therapy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective study using UPOINT. Urology. 2010;75(6):1249–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.021
  16. Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983;306(5944):686–688. DOI: 10.1038/ 306686a0
  17. Savidge CJ, Slade P. Psychological aspects of chronic pelvic pain. J Psychosom Res. 1997;42(5):433–444. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107478084.008
  18. Parker J, Buga S, Sarria JE, Spiess PE. Advancements in the Management of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain: What is New and What Do We Know? Curr Urol Rep. 2010;11(4):286–291. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0121-9
  19. Sobchik LN. Standartizirovannyj mnogofaktornyj metod issledovanija lichnosti SMIL. (Praktikum po psihodiagnostike). Saint Petersburg: Rech’, 2002. 217 p. (In Russ.)
  20. Naboka YL, Gudima IA, Mordanov SV, et al Virusuria as a component of the urine microbiota and its significance for assessing the health of the urinary tract: a descriptive clinical study. Urologiia. 2020;(1):12–18. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18565/urology.2020.1.12-18
  21. Naboka YL, Kogan MI, Gudima IA, et al. Is there a relationship between the urine, vagina, and gut microbiota in patients with an infection of the upper urinary tract? Vestnik Urologii. 2019;7(1):38–45. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2019-7-1-38-45
  22. Zmushko EI, Belozerov ES, Minin JA. Klinicheskaja immunologija. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2001. (In Russ.)
  23. Kiseleva EB, Moiseev AA, Kuyarov AS, et al. In vivo assessment of structural changes of the urethra in lower urinary tract disease using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography. J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2020;13(903848). doi: 10.1142/S1793545820500248
  24. Dubatova IV, Voyakina VG, Lepyavka SV, et al. The use of psychometric methods for the diagnosis of anxiety and depressive disorders in patients with a general somatic profile. Kazan medical journal. 2019;100(4):565–570. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/KMJ 2019-565
  25. Osin EN, Leontiev DA. Brief Russian-Language Instruments to Measure Subjective Well-Being: Psychometric Properties and Comparative Analysis. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2020;(1):117–142. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Comparison in VAS results

下载 (194KB)
3. Fig. 2. Comparative analysis of SF-36 results

下载 (243KB)
4. Fig. 3. Average scores on the following validity scales: L, F and K

下载 (115KB)
5. Fig. 4. Psychological status of a patient with chronic pelvic pain syndrome according to the MMPI content scales

下载 (111KB)

版权所有 © Khalak M., Molvi M., Lazukin V., Bozhkova E., Streltsova O., 2021


 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).